• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

师生关系量表学生版(S-TSRI):编制、验证与恒常性

Student Version of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory (S-TSRI): Development, Validation and Invariance.

作者信息

Ang Rebecca P, Ong Soo Lin, Li Xiang

机构信息

National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Ministry of Education, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01724. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01724
PMID:32849031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7399382/
Abstract

There is limited knowledge concerning children's relationships with their teachers, and specifically, we lack a suitable, culturally appropriate measurement instrument for assessing the teacher-student relationship from the student's perspective in Asia. This study used attachment theory as a theoretical framework to understand teacher-student relationships. Using a dataset from the Ministry of Education (MOE) of Singapore, the authors developed and validated a student version of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory (S-TSRI), with good psychometric properties for Singaporean children. The three-factor S-TSRI model comprising the factors satisfaction, instrumental help, and conflict was first established by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Through subsequent multigroup CFAs, we found that the factorial invariance was supported across gender, grade levels, and students of different academic levels, represented by the pass and fail groups. The structural model was tested in the total, pass, and fail groups. For the total and pass groups, the factors satisfaction and instrumental help showed significant positive relationships with a sense of school belonging, and negative or non-significant relationships with aggression. The conflict factor showed a weaker negative or non-significant relationship with a sense of school belonging, and a positive relationship with aggression. For the fail group, identical results were obtained with one exception; this was discussed in light of the fail group having a different needs profile. Findings from this study show that the 14-item S-TSRI measure has robust psychometric properties and yields scores that are reliable and valid in this large sample of primary school students from Singapore.

摘要

关于儿童与教师关系的知识有限,具体而言,我们缺乏一种适合亚洲文化背景、从学生视角评估师生关系的测量工具。本研究以依恋理论为理论框架来理解师生关系。作者利用新加坡教育部(MOE)的数据集,开发并验证了学生版的师生关系量表(S-TSRI),该量表对新加坡儿童具有良好的心理测量学特性。由满意度、工具性帮助和冲突这三个因素构成的S-TSRI模型首先通过探索性因素分析(EFA)建立,并经验证性因素分析(CFA)得到确认。通过后续的多组验证性因素分析,我们发现该模型在性别、年级水平以及以及格和不及格组为代表的不同学业水平的学生中都具有因素不变性。在总样本、及格组和不及格组中对结构模型进行了检验。对于总样本组和及格组,满意度和工具性帮助这两个因素与学校归属感呈显著正相关,与攻击性行为呈负相关或不显著相关。冲突因素与学校归属感呈较弱的负相关或不显著相关,与攻击性行为呈正相关。对于不及格组,除一个例外情况外得到了相同的结果;针对不及格组具有不同需求概况这一点进行了讨论。本研究结果表明,14项的S-TSRI测量工具具有稳健的心理测量学特性,并且在来自新加坡的这个小学生大样本中得出的分数是可靠且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6083/7399382/513e2e8f5328/fpsyg-11-01724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6083/7399382/513e2e8f5328/fpsyg-11-01724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6083/7399382/513e2e8f5328/fpsyg-11-01724-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Student Version of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory (S-TSRI): Development, Validation and Invariance.师生关系量表学生版(S-TSRI):编制、验证与恒常性
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01724. eCollection 2020.
2
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
3
Applying Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale in a Representative Greek Sample.应用探索性结构方程模型检验希腊代表性样本中的师生关系量表。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 15;9:733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00733. eCollection 2018.
4
Can closeness, conflict, and dependency be used to characterize students' perceptions of the affective relationship with their teacher? Testing a new child measure in middle childhood.亲密、冲突和依赖能否用于描述学生对与教师情感关系的认知?对童年中期一种新的儿童测量方法进行测试。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Dec;85(4):479-97. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12094. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
5
Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences.师生关系质量与小学学业成绩:对性别差异的纵向考察。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:119-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
6
The Psychometric Properties of the Student-Teacher Relationship Measure for Omani Grade 7-11 Students.阿曼7至11年级学生师生关系量表的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 11;10:2283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02283. eCollection 2019.
7
Student-Teacher Relationships As a Protective Factor for School Adjustment during the Transition from Middle to High School.师生关系作为初中向高中过渡期间学校适应的保护因素。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 23;7:1988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01988. eCollection 2016.
8
The Quality of Early Caregiving and Teacher-Student Relationships in Grade School Independently Predict Adolescent Academic Achievement.小学早期照料质量和师生关系可独立预测青少年学业成绩。
Int J Behav Dev. 2023 Mar;47(2):158-168. doi: 10.1177/01650254221137511. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
The Cultural Humility Scale for Students: Development and initial validation among adolescents.学生文化谦逊量表:青少年群体中的编制与初步验证。
J Sch Psychol. 2023 Aug;99:101224. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101224. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
10
Elementary Students' Effortful Control and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Teacher-Student Relationship Quality.小学生的努力控制与学业成绩:师生关系质量的中介作用。
Early Child Res Q. 2017;40:98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.10.004. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Interrupting the Link Between Temperamental risk, Adverse Parenting Practices, and Externalizing Problems in School-Aged Children: The Role of Teacher-Child Relationships.切断气质性风险、不良养育方式与学龄儿童外化问题之间的联系:师生关系的作用。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01891-7.
2
A Meta-Analytic Review of Personality and Teacher-Student Relationships.人格与师生关系的元分析综述
J Pers. 2024 Oct 29. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12986.
3
How Children Feel Matters: Teacher-Student Relationship as an Indirect Role Between Interpersonal Trust and Social Adjustment.

本文引用的文献

1
Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences.师生关系质量与小学学业成绩:对性别差异的纵向考察。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:119-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
2
Can closeness, conflict, and dependency be used to characterize students' perceptions of the affective relationship with their teacher? Testing a new child measure in middle childhood.亲密、冲突和依赖能否用于描述学生对与教师情感关系的认知?对童年中期一种新的儿童测量方法进行测试。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Dec;85(4):479-97. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12094. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
儿童的感受至关重要:师生关系在人际信任与社会适应之间的间接作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 18;11:581235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581235. eCollection 2020.
Development and psychometric analysis of the student-teacher relationship scale - short form.
师生关系量表简版的编制与心理测量学分析
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 26;6:898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00898. eCollection 2015.
4
Teacher Network of Relationships Inventory: measurement invariance of academically at-risk students across ages 6 to 15.教师关系网络量表:6至15岁学业风险学生的测量不变性
Sch Psychol Q. 2015 Mar;30(1):23-36. doi: 10.1037/spq0000063. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Teacher-child relationships from an attachment perspective.从依恋视角看师幼关系。
Attach Hum Dev. 2012;14(3):205-11. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.672260.
6
Validating the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: testing factor structure and measurement invariance across child gender and age in a Dutch sample.验证师生关系量表:在荷兰样本中检验儿童性别和年龄的因子结构和测量不变性。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Apr;50(2):215-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
7
Teacher-student relationship quality type in elementary grades: Effects on trajectories for achievement and engagement.小学阶段师生关系质量类型:对成就和参与轨迹的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2010 Oct;48(5):357-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
8
Teacher-Student Support, Effortful Engagement, and Achievement: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study.师生支持、努力投入与学业成就:一项为期三年的纵向研究。
J Educ Psychol. 2008 Feb 1;100(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1.
9
Influence of Student-Teacher and Parent-Teacher Relationships on Lower Achieving Readers' Engagement and Achievement in the Primary Grades.师生关系和亲子关系对小学低年级阅读成绩较低学生的参与度和学业成就的影响。
J Educ Psychol. 2007 Feb;99(1):39-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.39.
10
Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade.早期师生关系与八年级前儿童学业成果的发展轨迹。
Child Dev. 2001 Mar-Apr;72(2):625-38. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00301.