Suppr超能文献

术后非小细胞肺癌患者第二原发性肺癌治疗后生存结局的预后研究。

Prognostic study for survival outcome following the treatment of second primary lung cancer in patients with previously resected non-small cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Peking Union Medical College, Eight-year MD program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Thorac Cancer. 2020 Oct;11(10):2840-2851. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13610. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who have previously undergone surgical resection of initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) are at high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). There are still no standard treatments for SPLC. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors and compare survival between the different SPLC treatment groups.

METHODS

SPLC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Prognostic factors for SPLC were identified, using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and univariate Cox analysis to select variables for multivariate Cox analysis. Kaplan-Meier method plus log-rank test and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were used to compare survival outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 665 SPLC patients were finally enrolled into the study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male vs. female (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.29-2.59, P = 0.001), tumor size of SPLC ≥1 cm vs. <1 cm (HR = 1.80, 96% CI: 1.07-3.02, P = 1.028), IPLC characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma (HR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17-3.04, P = 0.009), clinical stage II vs. stage I (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.08-6.27, P = 0.033), and T2 stage vs. T1 stage (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.04-2.72, P = 0.034) indicated worse survival. SPLC patients demonstrated a five-year survival rate of 68.6% and a five-year RMST of 49.4 months. The choice of surgical procedure (wedge resection, segmentectomy and lobectomy) for both IPLC and SPLC had no significant effect on prognosis (P > 0.05). Patients that received radiotherapy for SPLC also demonstrated similar survival when compared with those that underwent surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy and sublobar resection can be considered reasonable alternative treatments for SPLC, especially when patients are unable to tolerate lobectomy.

摘要

背景

曾接受初始原发性肺癌(IPLC)手术切除的患者发生第二原发性肺癌(SPLC)的风险很高。目前还没有针对 SPLC 的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在确定 SPLC 的预后因素,并比较不同 SPLC 治疗组的生存情况。

方法

回顾性分析 2007 年至 2016 年间 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results(SEER)数据库中的 SPLC 患者。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和单因素 Cox 分析来选择变量进行多因素 Cox 分析,确定 SPLC 的预后因素。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法加对数秩检验和限制平均生存时间(RMST)比较生存结果。

结果

最终纳入 665 例 SPLC 患者进行研究。多因素 Cox 回归分析显示,男性与女性相比(HR=1.82,95%CI:1.29-2.59,P=0.001),SPLC 肿瘤大小≥1cm 与<1cm 相比(HR=1.80,96%CI:1.07-3.02,P=1.028),IPLC 特征为鳞癌与腺癌相比(HR=1.89,95%CI:1.17-3.04,P=0.009),临床分期为 II 期与 I 期相比(HR=2.60,95%CI:1.08-6.27,P=0.033),T2 期与 T1 期相比(HR=1.68,95%CI:1.04-2.72,P=0.034),提示生存情况较差。SPLC 患者的五年生存率为 68.6%,五年 RMST 为 49.4 个月。IPLC 和 SPLC 楔形切除术、肺段切除术和肺叶切除术的手术方式选择对预后无显著影响(P>0.05)。接受 SPLC 放疗的患者与接受手术的患者的生存情况相似(P>0.05)。

结论

放疗和亚肺叶切除术可作为 SPLC 的合理替代治疗方法,特别是当患者无法耐受肺叶切除术时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bace/7529572/3a916560622c/TCA-11-2840-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验