Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Apr 11;114(4):618-625. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab224.
Lung cancer survivors have a high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC), but little is known about the survival impact of SPLC diagnosis.
We analyzed data from 138 969 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), who were surgically treated for initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) in 1988-2013. Each patient was followed from the date of IPLC diagnosis to SPLC diagnosis (for those with SPLC) and last vital status through 2016. We performed multivariable Cox regression to evaluate the association between overall survival and SPLC diagnosis as a time-varying predictor. To investigate potential effect modification, we tested interaction between SPLC and IPLC stage. Using data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC) (n = 1540 IPLC patients with surgery), we evaluated the survival impact of SPLC by smoking status. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
A total of 12 115 (8.7%) patients developed SPLC in SEER over 700 421 person-years of follow-up. Compared with patients with single primary lung cancer, those with SPLC had statistically significantly reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06 to 2.17; P < .001). The effect of SPLC on reduced survival was more pronounced among patients with early stage IPLC vs advanced-stage IPLC (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 2.08 to 2.20, vs HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.70, respectively; Pinteraction < .001). Analysis using MEC data showed that the effect of SPLC on reduced survival was statistically significantly larger among persons who actively smoked at initial diagnosis vs those who formerly or never smoked (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.48 to 3.61, vs HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.98 to 2.03, respectively; Pinteraction = .04).
SPLC diagnosis is statistically significantly associated with decreased survival in SEER and MEC. Intensive surveillance targeting patients with early stage IPLC and active smoking at IPLC diagnosis may lead to a larger survival benefit.
肺癌幸存者发生第二原发肺癌(SPLC)的风险较高,但对 SPLC 诊断对生存的影响知之甚少。
我们分析了 1988 年至 2013 年间,在美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中接受初始原发性肺癌(IPLC)手术治疗的 138969 例患者的数据。每位患者从 IPLC 诊断日期开始随访,直至 SPLC 诊断(对于有 SPLC 的患者)和截至 2016 年的最后一次生存状态。我们采用多变量 Cox 回归评估 SPLC 诊断作为时变预测因子与总生存之间的关联。为了研究潜在的效应修饰,我们检验了 SPLC 与 IPLC 分期之间的交互作用。使用来自多民族队列研究(MEC)(n=1540 例接受手术的 IPLC 患者)的数据,我们根据 SPLC 患者的吸烟状况评估了 SPLC 对生存的影响。所有统计检验均为双侧。
在 SEER 中,共有 12115 例(8.7%)患者在 700421 人年的随访中发生了 SPLC。与仅有单发性肺癌的患者相比,发生 SPLC 的患者总生存明显降低(风险比[HR] = 2.12,95%置信区间[CI] = 2.06 至 2.17;P < .001)。在 IPLC 早期患者与晚期患者中,SPLC 对降低生存率的影响更为明显(HR = 2.14,95% CI = 2.08 至 2.20,vs HR = 1.43,95% CI = 1.21 至 1.70,分别;P 交互 < .001)。使用 MEC 数据进行的分析表明,与初始诊断时积极吸烟的患者相比,初始诊断时曾吸烟或从不吸烟的患者的 SPLC 对降低生存率的影响具有统计学意义(HR = 2.31,95% CI = 1.48 至 3.61,vs HR = 1.41,95% CI = 0.98 至 2.03,分别;P 交互 = .04)。
SEER 和 MEC 中的 SPLC 诊断与生存率降低具有统计学意义相关。针对 IPLC 早期患者和 IPLC 诊断时积极吸烟的患者进行强化监测可能会带来更大的生存获益。