Institut Chirurgical de la Main et du Membre Supérieur, Clinique du Medipole, Villeurbanne, France.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 18;102(22):2001-2007. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00414.
When revision elbow arthroplasty is required in the presence of structural proximal ulnar bone loss and triceps insufficiency, structural ulnar bone-grafting and triceps reconstruction are both required to reconstruct the skeleton and to restore active extension. We have developed a technique utilizing a structural proximal ulnar allograft with its attached triceps as an allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) to provide reconstruction of the proximal ulnar bone and deficient extensor mechanism with the same allograft.
Between 2010 and 2017, the senior author performed 10 revision elbow arthroplasties using a proximal ulnar allograft with its intact triceps tendon allograft. The allograft ulna was combined with an ulnar component in an APC fashion, whereas the remaining triceps was repaired to the triceps allograft. Indications for a revision surgical procedure included aseptic loosening in 4 elbows, periprosthetic ulnar fracture with component loosening in 2 elbows, and the second stage of a 2-stage reimplantation in 4 elbows. Two elbows also required humeral APCs due to associated structural humeral bone loss. Postoperatively, all elbows were immobilized in extension for 6 weeks. The mean follow-up time was 45 months (range, 24 to 76 months).
Revision elbow arthroplasty resulted in pain improvement in all elbows in a 10-point visual analog scale. The mean flexion-extension arc was 95°, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 76 points (range, 45 to 95 points), and the mean triceps strength score was 4. There were 6 reoperations: 3 for humeral loosening, 1 for deep infection, 1 for fracture of the ulnar allograft, and 1 for wound debridement and closure. For the 8 elbows with an intact ulnar reconstruction, no ulnar components were radiographically loose, and the ulnar graft was considered radiographically intact and healed in 8 elbows.
Reconstruction of the proximal part of the ulna and triceps in failed elbow arthroplasties with structural ulnar bone loss can be effectively accomplished using a structural proximal ulnar allograft as an APC with the preserved triceps tendon for the extensor mechanism reconstruction, but the procedure is associated with an expected high reoperation rate, as is the case in complex revision elbow arthroplasty.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
当revision elbow arthroplasty 存在结构性近侧尺骨骨丢失和三头肌不足时,需要进行结构性尺骨植骨和三头肌重建,以重建骨骼并恢复主动伸展。我们开发了一种利用结构完整的尺骨近端同种异体骨和附着的三头肌作为同种异体-假体复合物(APC)的技术,用同一同种异体骨提供近侧尺骨骨重建和伸肌机制的缺失。
2010 年至 2017 年,高级作者使用 10 例带有完整三头肌肌腱同种异体骨的尺骨近端同种异体骨进行了 10 例 revision elbow arthroplasty。同种异体尺骨与 APC 方式的尺骨组件相结合,而剩余的三头肌则修复到三头肌同种异体骨上。revision 手术的指征包括 4 例无菌性松动、2 例尺骨假体周围骨折伴假体松动、4 例二期再植入的第二期、2 例还需要肱骨 APC 由于伴发结构性肱骨骨丢失。术后所有肘部均在 6 周内保持伸直位固定。平均随访时间为 45 个月(范围 24 至 76 个月)。
所有肘部的 revision elbow arthroplasty 在 10 分制视觉模拟量表中均改善了疼痛。平均屈伸弧为 95°,平均 Mayo 肘功能评分 76 分(45 至 95 分),三头肌力量评分 4 分。有 6 例再次手术:3 例肱骨松动,1 例深部感染,1 例尺骨同种异体骨骨折,1 例清创缝合。对于 8 例尺骨重建完整的肘部,没有尺骨组件影像学松动,8 例尺骨移植物影像学完整,愈合良好。
在存在结构性尺骨骨丢失的失败肘关节炎中,使用结构完整的尺骨近端同种异体骨作为 APC,并保留三头肌肌腱重建伸肌机制,可以有效地重建近侧尺骨和三头肌,但与复杂 revision elbow arthroplasty 一样,该手术的再手术率预计较高。
治疗 IV 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。