Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Aug 3;93(15):1399-407. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00102.
Limited information exists related to the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the ulna after semiconstrained elbow arthroplasty. Our goals were to characterize the clinical and radiographic features of periprosthetic fractures around the stem of a loose ulnar component and to determine the outcomes after surgical treatment.
Between 1980 and 2008, thirty consecutive periprosthetic fractures around the ulnar stem were treated surgically at our institution. Eighteen fractures occurred after primary arthroplasty, and twelve occurred after revision arthroplasty. The mean time between the index arthroplasty and the fracture was eight years. All ulnar components were loose. Ulnar bone loss was moderate in fourteen elbows and severe in sixteen. Surgical reconstruction included revision of the ulnar component in all cases. Fracture fixation was achieved with a longer stemmed implant only in two elbows. Strut allografts were used in twenty elbows, with additional impaction graft augmentation in eight of them. Three additional elbows were revised with impaction grafting alone, and five were reconstructed with an allograft ulnar prosthetic composite. Seven patients were lost to follow-up, one died, and one was managed with conversion to a resection arthroplasty following a deep infection. The remaining twenty-one patients were followed for a mean of 4.9 ± 2.6 years.
At the time of the most recent follow-up, eighteen patients reported no pain or mild pain and three patients reported moderate pain. The mean arc of elbow flexion and extension was 112°. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 82 points (with fifteen good or excellent results and six fair or poor results). Fracture-healing was achieved in the twenty-one followed patients. Complications included three deep infections, one superficial infection, one case of ulnar component loosening, and one case of transient dysfunction of both the median and radial nerves.
Periprosthetic ulnar fractures around the stem of a loose ulnar component after total elbow arthroplasty usually combine implant loosening and severe bone loss. Revision of the ulnar component may require additional strut allografts, allograft-prosthetic composites, or impaction grafting. Satisfactory outcomes were seen after the majority of revisions; however, deep infections and component loosening continue to be serious complications.
半限制型肘关节置换术后发生尺骨假体周围骨折的治疗方法相关信息有限。我们的目标是分析尺骨干假体周围骨折的临床和影像学特征,并确定手术治疗后的结果。
1980 年至 2008 年,我们机构共治疗了 30 例尺骨干假体周围骨折患者。18 例发生在初次关节置换术后,12 例发生在翻修术后。初次关节置换术后至骨折的平均时间为 8 年。所有尺骨组件均松动。14 例尺骨有中度骨丢失,16 例有重度骨丢失。所有病例均行尺骨组件翻修。只有 2 例采用长柄假体固定骨折,其余病例均采用支撑异体骨移植。20 例采用支撑异体骨移植,其中 8 例联合打压植骨。另外 3 例仅采用打压植骨翻修,5 例采用异体尺骨假体复合骨移植重建。7 例失访,1 例死亡,1 例因深部感染改行关节切除成形术。其余 21 例患者的平均随访时间为 4.9±2.6 年。
末次随访时,18 例患者报告无疼痛或轻度疼痛,3 例报告中度疼痛。平均肘关节屈伸弧为 112°。Mayo 肘关节功能评分 82 分(15 例为优或良,6 例为可或差)。21 例获得骨折愈合。并发症包括 3 例深部感染、1 例浅表感染、1 例尺骨组件松动和 1 例正中神经和桡神经一过性功能障碍。
全肘关节置换术后发生于松动尺骨组件周围的尺骨干假体周围骨折通常与假体松动和严重骨丢失有关。尺骨组件翻修可能需要额外的支撑异体骨移植、异体骨-假体复合材料或打压植骨。大多数翻修后效果满意,但深部感染和组件松动仍是严重的并发症。