Suppr超能文献

两种芬戈莫德剂量与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验

Efficacy and Safety of 2 Fingolimod Doses vs Glatiramer Acetate for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Cree Bruce A C, Goldman Myla D, Corboy John R, Singer Barry A, Fox Edward J, Arnold Douglas L, Ford Corey, Weinstock-Guttman Bianca, Bar-Or Amit, Mientus Susanne, Sienkiewicz Daniel, Zhang Ying, Karan Rajesh, Tenenbaum Nadia

机构信息

UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.

Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 24;78(1):1-13. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2950.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Doses of fingolimod lower than 0.5 mg per day were not investigated during the fingolimod clinical development program. Whether lower doses of fingolimod might retain efficacy with fewer safety risks remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod, 0.5 mg, and fingolimod, 0.25 mg, compared with glatiramer acetate and to assess whether these doses of fingolimod show superior efficacy to glatiramer acetate in adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, or fingolimod, 0.25 mg, orally once per day or glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, subcutaneously once per day.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Multiple Sclerosis Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Fingolimod Versus Copaxone (ASSESS) was a phase 3b multicenter randomized rater-blinded and dose-blinded 12-month clinical trial conducted between August 9, 2012, and April 30, 2018 (including the time required to recruit participants). A total of 1461 patients aged 18 to 65 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were screened, and 1064 participants were randomized. These participants had at least 1 documented relapse during the previous year or 2 documented relapses during the previous 2 years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0 to 6 at screening. Data were analyzed between September and November 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The superiority of the fingolimod doses was tested hierarchically, with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, tested first, followed by fingolimod, 0.25 mg, vs glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. The primary end point was the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR). Magnetic resonance imaging parameters, safety, and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 1461 adult patients screened, 1064 participants (72.8%) were randomized (mean [SD] age, 39.6 [11.0] years; 792 women [74.4%]) to 3 treatment groups: 352 participants received fingolimod, 0.5 mg, 370 participants received fingolimod, 0.25 mg, and 342 participants received glatiramer acetate, 20 mg. In total, 859 participants (80.7%) completed the study. Treatment with fingolimod, 0.5 mg, was superior to treatment with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, in reducing ARR (40.7% relative reduction); the relative reduction with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, was 14.6%, which was not statistically significant (for fingolimod, 0.5 mg, ARR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.11-0.21; for fingolimod, 0.25 mg, ARR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.17-0.29; for glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, ARR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34). Treatment with both fingolimod doses (0.5 mg and 0.25 mg) significantly reduced new or newly enlarging T2 and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions compared with treatment with glatiramer acetate. Adverse events were reported in similar proportions across treatment groups (312 participants [90.4%] in the fingolimod, 0.5 mg, group, 323 participants [88.3%] in the fingolimod, 0.25 mg, group, and 283 participants [87.3%] in the glatiramer acetate group).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Fingolimod, 0.5 mg, demonstrated superior clinical efficacy compared with glatiramer acetate, 20 mg, and had a superior benefit-risk profile compared with fingolimod, 0.25 mg, in adult participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01633112.

摘要

重要性

在芬戈莫德的临床研发项目中,未对每日剂量低于0.5毫克的情况进行研究。较低剂量的芬戈莫德是否能在降低安全风险的同时保持疗效仍不明确。

目的

评估0.5毫克芬戈莫德和0.25毫克芬戈莫德与醋酸格拉替雷相比的疗效和安全性,并评估这些剂量的芬戈莫德在复发缓解型多发性硬化症成年患者中是否显示出优于醋酸格拉替雷的疗效。

干预措施

0.5毫克芬戈莫德或0.25毫克芬戈莫德,每日口服一次;或20毫克醋酸格拉替雷,每日皮下注射一次。

设计、地点和参与者:评估两种剂量芬戈莫德与考帕松安全性和疗效的多发性硬化症研究(ASSESS)是一项3b期多中心随机、评估者盲法和剂量盲法的12个月临床试验,于2012年8月9日至2018年4月30日进行(包括招募参与者所需的时间)。共筛选了1461例年龄在18至65岁之间的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者,1064名参与者被随机分组。这些参与者在过去一年中至少有1次记录在案的复发,或在过去两年中有2次记录在案的复发,且筛查时扩展残疾状态量表评分为0至6分。于2018年9月至11月进行数据分析。

主要结局和指标

对芬戈莫德各剂量的优越性进行分层检验,首先检验0.5毫克芬戈莫德与20毫克醋酸格拉替雷,然后检验0.25毫克芬戈莫德与20毫克醋酸格拉替雷。主要终点是年化复发率(ARR)的降低。还评估了磁共振成像参数、安全性和耐受性。

结果

在1461例筛查的成年患者中,1064名参与者(72.8%)被随机分组(平均[标准差]年龄,39.6[11.0]岁;792名女性[74.4%]),分为3个治疗组:352名参与者接受0.5毫克芬戈莫德,370名参与者接受0.25毫克芬戈莫德,342名参与者接受20毫克醋酸格拉替雷。共有859名参与者(80.7%)完成了研究。0.5毫克芬戈莫德治疗在降低ARR方面优于20毫克醋酸格拉替雷治疗(相对降低40.7%);0.25毫克芬戈莫德的相对降低率为14.6%,无统计学意义(0.5毫克芬戈莫德组的ARR为0.15;95%CI,0.11 - 0.21;0.25毫克芬戈莫德组的ARR为0.22;95%CI,0.17 - 0.29;20毫克醋酸格拉替雷组的ARR为0.26;95%CI,0.20 - 0.34)。与醋酸格拉替雷治疗相比,两种剂量(0.5毫克和0.25毫克)的芬戈莫德治疗均显著减少了新的或新增大的T2和钆增强T1病变。各治疗组报告的不良事件比例相似(0.5毫克芬戈莫德组312名参与者[90.4%],0.25毫克芬戈莫德组323名参与者[88.3%],醋酸格拉替雷组283名参与者[87.3%])。

结论与相关性

在复发缓解型多发性硬化症成年参与者中,0.5毫克芬戈莫德与20毫克醋酸格拉替雷相比显示出更优的临床疗效,且与0.25毫克芬戈莫德相比具有更优的效益风险比。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01633112。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验