Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Neurology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine (ÇAPA), İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;53(1):323-332. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5588. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
During multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment different modes of action such as lateral (interferon beta to glatiramer acetate or glatiramer acetate to interferon beta) or vertical (interferon beta/glatiramer acetate to fingolimod) drug switch can be performed. This study aims to investigate the clinical effectiveness of switching from the first-line injectable disease modifying treatments (iDMTs) to fingolimod (FNG) compared to switching between first-line iDMTs.
This is a multicenter, observational and retrospective study of patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had lateral and vertical switch. The observation period included three key assessment time points (before the switch, at switch, and after the switch). Data were collected from the MS patients' database by neurologists between January 2018 and June 2019. The longest follow-up period of the patients was determined as 24 months after the switch.
In 462 MS patients that were included in the study, both treatments significantly decreased the number of relapses during the postswitch 12 months versus preswitch one year while patients in the FNG group experienced significantly fewer relapses compared to iDMT cohort in the postswitch 12 months period. FNG cohort experienced fewer relapses than in the iDMT cohort within the postswitch 2 year. The mean time to first relapse after the switch was significantly longer in the FNG group.
The present study revealed superior effectiveness of vertical switch over lateral switch regarding the improvement in relapse outcomes. Patients in the FNG cohort experienced sustainably fewer relapses during the follow-up period after the switch compared the iDMT cohort. Importantly, switching to FNG was more effective in delaying time to first relapse when compared with iDMTs.
在多发性硬化症(MS)治疗中,可以进行不同作用模式的转换,如横向(干扰素β至格拉替雷或格拉替雷至干扰素β)或纵向(干扰素β/格拉替雷至芬戈莫德)药物转换。本研究旨在比较从一线注射用疾病修正治疗(iDMT)转换为芬戈莫德(FNG)与一线 iDMT 之间转换的临床效果。
这是一项多中心、观察性和回顾性研究,纳入了进行横向和纵向转换的复发缓解型 MS 患者。观察期包括三个关键评估时间点(转换前、转换时和转换后)。研究人员从 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月间从 MS 患者的数据库中收集数据。患者的最长随访期确定为转换后 24 个月。
在纳入研究的 462 名 MS 患者中,两种治疗方案在转换后 12 个月内均显著降低了复发次数,与转换前一年相比,而 FNG 组患者在转换后 12 个月内的复发次数明显少于 iDMT 组。在转换后 2 年内,FNG 组的复发次数少于 iDMT 组。转换后首次复发的平均时间在 FNG 组明显延长。
本研究显示,在改善复发结局方面,纵向转换优于横向转换。与 iDMT 组相比,转换后 FNG 组在随访期间持续较少发生复发。重要的是,与 iDMTs 相比,转换为 FNG 更能有效延迟首次复发的时间。