• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜下剥离术切除早期结直肠肿瘤的学习曲线:应用累积和法。

Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasms with a monopolar scissor-type knife: use of the cumulative sum method.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;55(10):1234-1242. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1807597. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1080/00365521.2020.1807597
PMID:32853052
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although scissor-type knives such as the Stag-Beetle (SB) Knife Jr are expected to result in a safe and easy colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (CR-ESD), information regarding the learning curve is lacking. Therefore, this study evaluated the learning curve with using SB Knife Jr.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 507 CR-ESD procedures performed in 464 patients using SB Knife Jr. The primary endpoint was a learning curve to achieve a satisfactory complete resection rate. The secondary endpoints were learning curves to achieve a satisfactory resection rate, curative resection rate, and resection speed.

RESULTS

The complete, , and curative resection rates were 91.9%, 95.9%, and 84.0%, respectively. Moving average analysis showed that 39 cases were required for a complete resection rate of >80%, 41 for an resection rate of >90%, and 50 for a curative resection rate of >75%. We divided the procedure into three phases using the cumulative sum method: I, II, and III (cases 1-36, 37-119, and 120-507, respectively). Although we found no significant between-phase differences, the complete resection rate showed an increasing trend in Phase III (83.3 vs. 89.2 vs. 93.3%; = .099). The resection rate (91.7 vs. 91.6 vs. 97.2%; = .047) and resection speed (20.5 vs. 7.2 vs. 6.8 min/cm; < .001) were greater in Phase III. Despite the larger specimen size (27.3 vs. 38.2 vs. 40.4 mm; < .001) and more severe fibrosis ( < .001) in Phase III, the procedure time was shorter (73.8 vs. 57.8 vs. 54.2 min; = .041). The curative resection rate was not significantly different between phases.

CONCLUSIONS

SB Knife Jr enables safe and easy CR-ESD during the introductory period compared to the conventional tip-type knife and has an acceptable learning curve. Therefore, using this knife will encourage the widespread adoption of CR-ESD in Asian general hospitals and non-Asian countries.

摘要

目的

尽管诸如 Stag-Beetle(SB)Knife Jr 等剪刀式刀被认为可以安全且轻松地进行结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(CR-ESD),但有关学习曲线的信息仍有所欠缺。因此,本研究旨在评估使用 SB Knife Jr 的学习曲线。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了使用 SB Knife Jr 为 464 例患者实施的 507 例 CR-ESD 手术。主要终点是达到满意的完全切除率的学习曲线。次要终点是达到满意的切除率、治愈性切除率和切除速度的学习曲线。

结果

完全切除率、 切除率和治愈性切除率分别为 91.9%、95.9%和 84.0%。移动平均分析显示,需要 39 例才能使完全切除率>80%,41 例才能使 切除率>90%,50 例才能使治愈性切除率>75%。我们使用累积和法将手术分为三个阶段:I 期、II 期和 III 期(病例数分别为 1-36、37-119 和 120-507)。尽管我们没有发现各阶段之间有显著差异,但 III 期的完全切除率呈上升趋势(83.3%比 89.2%比 93.3%; =.099)。 切除率(91.7%比 91.6%比 97.2%; =.047)和切除速度(20.5 比 7.2 比 6.8 min/cm; <.001)在 III 期更大。尽管 III 期的标本尺寸较大(27.3 比 38.2 比 40.4 mm; <.001)和纤维化更严重( <.001),但手术时间更短(73.8 比 57.8 比 54.2 min; =.041)。各阶段的治愈性切除率无显著差异。

结论

与传统尖端型刀相比,SB Knife Jr 在介绍期内可安全且轻松地进行 CR-ESD,且具有可接受的学习曲线。因此,使用这种刀将鼓励亚洲普通医院和非亚洲国家广泛采用 CR-ESD。

相似文献

1
Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasms with a monopolar scissor-type knife: use of the cumulative sum method.内镜黏膜下剥离术切除早期结直肠肿瘤的学习曲线:应用累积和法。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;55(10):1234-1242. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1807597. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasms with a monopolar scissor-type knife: short- to long-term outcomes.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期结直肠肿瘤的单极剪刀型刀:短期至长期结果。
Endoscopy. 2017 Sep;49(9):913-918. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113631. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
Learning curve analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for laterally spreading tumors by endoscopists experienced in gastric ESD.由有胃内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)经验的内镜医师进行的结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗侧向扩散肿瘤的学习曲线分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2422-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4493-2. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
4
Scissor-type knife significantly improves self-completion rate of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Single-center prospective randomized trial.剪刀式刀具显著提高结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的自我完成率:单中心前瞻性随机试验。
Dig Endosc. 2017 May;29(3):322-329. doi: 10.1111/den.12784. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
5
The effect of scissor-type versus non-scissor-type knives on the technical outcomes in endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.剪刀型与非剪刀型刀在内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌技术效果中的作用:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz077.
6
Efficacy of Two Kinds of Scissor-Type Knives for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Comparative Study.两种剪刀式刀在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:一项回顾性对比研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4214-4223. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08525-3. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
7
Usefulness and safety of SB knife Jr in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.SB 刀 Jr 在结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中的有效性和安全性。
Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:90-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01255.x.
8
Two electrosurgical endo-knives for endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal superficial neoplasms: a prospective randomized study.两种用于大肠浅表肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的电外科内镜刀:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Aug;5(8):E729-E735. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111792. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal neoplasms using the stag beetle knife.使用鹿角刀行内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管肿瘤。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 21;24(15):1632-1640. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1632.
10
Efficacy and safety comparison of scissor-type knives with needle-type knives for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a post-hoc propensity score-matched analysis (with videos).剪刀型刀与针型刀在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效和安全性比较:基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.042. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of scissor-type knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剪刀式刀具在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov-Dec;36(6):615-623. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0838. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single arm analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结直肠息肉:一项荟萃分析和单臂分析的荟萃回归
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 7;27(25):3925-3939. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925.