• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球所有权网络中的公司控制权的力量。

The power of corporate control in the global ownership network.

机构信息

Information and Society Research Division, National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan.

School of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0237862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237862. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237862
PMID:32853210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7451575/
Abstract

As passive investment through index funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) has become pervasive, the structure of corporate control in the global capital market is more complex than before. We propose a new model and calculation algorithm to measure a shareholder's power to control corporations in the global economy. Our method takes into account how fragmented voting rights attached to dispersed ownership may be consolidated to generate corporate control. Analyzing the ownership holdings in 49 million companies worldwide by 69 million shareholders in 2016, we find that the landscape of global corporate control appears differently if we adequately evaluate indirect influence via dispersed ownership. In particular, a larger portion of corporate control appears to be concentrated in the hands of sovereign governments than has been recognized before. Yet, such governmental capacities are "hidden" if we use the conventional method. Moreover, financial institutions appear to not be as powerful as emphasized before. These results point to important financial and political risks both for scholars and policymakers.

摘要

随着被动投资通过指数基金和交易所交易基金(ETF)变得普遍,全球资本市场的公司控制权结构比以往更加复杂。我们提出了一种新的模型和计算算法,以衡量股东在全球经济中控制公司的权力。我们的方法考虑了如何整合分散所有权所附带的零碎投票权,以产生公司控制权。通过分析 2016 年全球 4900 万家公司的所有权和 6900 万股东的所有权,我们发现,如果我们充分评估通过分散所有权产生的间接影响,全球公司控制权的格局就会有所不同。特别是,如果我们使用传统方法,那么更多的公司控制权似乎集中在主权政府手中。然而,如果使用传统方法,这些能力就“隐藏”了。此外,金融机构的影响力似乎不如以前强调的那么大。这些结果对学者和政策制定者都指出了重要的金融和政治风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/bf6a6352a4ef/pone.0237862.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/9abe1ff922ca/pone.0237862.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/5031a2390275/pone.0237862.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/df78e69c9880/pone.0237862.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/bf6a6352a4ef/pone.0237862.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/9abe1ff922ca/pone.0237862.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/5031a2390275/pone.0237862.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/df78e69c9880/pone.0237862.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0799/7451575/bf6a6352a4ef/pone.0237862.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The power of corporate control in the global ownership network.全球所有权网络中的公司控制权的力量。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0237862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237862. eCollection 2020.
2
Socially responsible investing through the equity funds in the global ownership network.通过全球所有权网络中的股权基金进行社会责任投资。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256160. eCollection 2021.
3
The flow of corporate control in the global ownership network.全球所有权网络中的公司控制权流动。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0290229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290229. eCollection 2023.
4
Financial influence on global risks of zoonotic emerging and re-emerging diseases: an integrative analysis.金融对人畜共患新出现和再出现疾病全球风险的影响:一项综合分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Dec;7(12):e951-e962. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00232-2.
5
Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic.企业对新冠疫情的豁免权。
J financ econ. 2021 Aug;141(2):802-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
6
Ownership, financing, and management strategies of the ten largest for-profit nursing home chains in the United States.美国十大营利性养老院连锁集团的所有权、融资和管理策略。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(4):725-46. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.4.g.
7
Beyond takeovers: politics comes to corporate control.超越收购:政治介入企业控制权。
Harv Bus Rev. 1992 Mar-Apr;70(2):83-93.
8
Do Largest Shareholders Incentively Affect Financial Sustainability Under Holdings Heterogeneity? Regulation/Intermediary of Financial Constraints Through Managerial Behavior Games.在股权异质性下,大股东激励是否会对财务可持续性产生影响?通过管理层行为博弈对财务约束进行规制/调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;13:754608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754608. eCollection 2022.
9
How mixed ownership affects investment efficiency? evidence from state-owned enterprises in China.混合所有制如何影响投资效率?来自中国国有企业的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0306190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306190. eCollection 2024.
10
The interdependence of corporate reputation and ownership: a network approach to quantify reputation.企业声誉与所有权的相互依存关系:一种量化声誉的网络方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Oct 30;6(10):190570. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190570. eCollection 2019 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
The flow of corporate control in the global ownership network.全球所有权网络中的公司控制权流动。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0290229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290229. eCollection 2023.
2
Socially responsible investing through the equity funds in the global ownership network.通过全球所有权网络中的股权基金进行社会责任投资。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256160. eCollection 2021.
3
Institutional investors and cost of capital: The moderating effect of ownership structure.机构投资者与资本成本:股权结构的调节效应。

本文引用的文献

1
The network of global corporate control.全球企业控制网络。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025995. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249963. eCollection 2021.