Suppr超能文献

FLASH 照射与常规剂量率照射相比,可减少严重皮肤毒性。

FLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.

Cancer Biology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.

出版信息

Radiat Res. 2020 Dec 1;194(6):618-624. doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00090.

Abstract

Radiation therapy, along with surgery and chemotherapy, is one of the main treatments for cancer. While radiotherapy is highly effective in the treatment of localized tumors, its main limitation is its toxicity to normal tissue. Previous preclinical studies have reported that ultra-high dose-rate (FLASH) irradiation results in reduced toxicity to normal tissues while controlling tumor growth to a similar extent relative to conventional-dose-rate (CONV) irradiation. To our knowledge this is the first report of a dose-response study in mice comparing the effect of FLASH irradiation vs. CONV irradiation on skin toxicity. We found that FLASH irradiation results in both a lower incidence and lower severity of skin ulceration than CONV irradiation 8 weeks after single-fraction hemithoracic irradiation at high doses (30 and 40 Gy). Survival was also higher after FLASH hemithoracic irradiation (median survival >180 days at doses of 30 and 40 Gy) compared to CONV irradiation (median survival 100 and 52 days at 30 and 40 Gy, respectively). No ulceration was observed at doses 20 Gy or below in either FLASH or CONV. These results suggest a shifting of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced skin ulceration to the right for FLASH, compared to CONV irradiation, suggesting the potential for an enhanced therapeutic index for radiation therapy of cancer.

摘要

放射治疗与手术和化疗一起,是癌症的主要治疗方法之一。虽然放射治疗在治疗局部肿瘤方面非常有效,但它的主要局限性是对正常组织的毒性。以前的临床前研究报告称,超高速率(FLASH)照射在控制肿瘤生长方面与常规剂量率(CONV)照射相当的情况下,对正常组织的毒性降低。据我们所知,这是第一个在小鼠中进行剂量反应研究的报告,比较了 FLASH 照射与 CONV 照射对皮肤毒性的影响。我们发现,与 CONV 照射相比,单次分割半胸照射高剂量(30 和 40 Gy)后,FLASH 照射导致皮肤溃疡的发生率和严重程度均较低。FLASH 半胸照射后的存活率也高于 CONV 照射(30 和 40 Gy 时的中位存活期分别为>180 天和 100 和 52 天)。FLASH 和 CONV 照射时,20 Gy 或以下的剂量均未观察到溃疡。这些结果表明,与 CONV 照射相比,FLASH 照射使放射诱导皮肤溃疡的剂量反应曲线向右移动,这表明癌症放射治疗的治疗指数可能提高。

相似文献

6
FLASH Effects Induced by Orthovoltage X-Rays.高能 X 射线产生的闪烁效应。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Nov 15;117(4):1018-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

6
The evolution of FLASH radiotherapy: a bibliometric analysis.FLASH放疗的发展:一项文献计量学分析
Front Oncol. 2025 May 15;15:1580848. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1580848. eCollection 2025.
8
The influence of beam parameters on FLASH effect.束流参数对FLASH效应的影响。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 22;15:1431700. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1431700. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy.氧分压在FLASH放射治疗中作用的定量分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jul 1;107(3):539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.634. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Treatment of a first patient with FLASH-radiotherapy.首例 FLASH 放疗患者的治疗。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?FLASH 放疗的临床转化:为何以及如何?
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
7
PHASER: A platform for clinical translation of FLASH cancer radiotherapy.PHASER:FLASH 癌症放疗临床转化的平台。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct;139:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验