• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨文化视角下,网络欺凌行为的理论预测因素的异同:来自七个国家的研究结果。

Cross-cultural similarities and differences in the theoretical predictors of cyberbullying perpetration: Results from a seven-country study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

Aggress Behav. 2021 Jan;47(1):111-119. doi: 10.1002/ab.21923. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1002/ab.21923
PMID:32853436
Abstract

The Barlett Gentile cyberbullying model (BGCM) posits that correlated anonymity perceptions and the belief in the irrelevance of muscularity for online bullying (BIMOB) predict positive cyberbullying attitudes to predict subsequent cyberbullying perpetration. Much research has shown the BGCM to be the only published theory that differentiates traditional and cyberbullying while validly predicting cyberbullying. So far, however, the cross-cultural ubiquity has gone understudied. Thus, 1,592 adult participants across seven countries (USA, Australia, Brazil, China, Germany, Japan, and Singapore) completed measures germane to the BGCM. Supporting the BGCM, the variables were significantly correlated for the entire sample, participants from independent cultures, and participants from interdependent cultures. However, the relationship between BIMOB and positive cyberbullying attitudes as well as the relationship between positive cyberbullying attitudes and cyberbullying perpetration were stronger for independent cultures. These results suggest that the BGCM postulates are mostly universal, but several relations appear to be culturally different. Theoretical implications are discussed.

摘要

巴利特-金蒂尔网络欺凌模型(BGCM)提出,相关的匿名感知和对肌肉力量在网络欺凌中无关紧要的信念(BIMOB)预测积极的网络欺凌态度,从而预测随后的网络欺凌行为。大量研究表明,BGCM 是唯一一种能够区分传统欺凌和网络欺凌并有效预测网络欺凌行为的已发表理论。然而,迄今为止,跨文化普遍性还没有得到充分研究。因此,来自 7 个国家(美国、澳大利亚、巴西、中国、德国、日本和新加坡)的 1592 名成年参与者完成了与 BGCM 相关的测量。支持 BGCM 的是,对于整个样本、来自独立文化的参与者和来自相互依存文化的参与者,这些变量之间存在显著的相关性。然而,对于独立文化的参与者来说,BIMOB 与积极的网络欺凌态度之间的关系以及积极的网络欺凌态度与网络欺凌行为之间的关系更为密切。这些结果表明,BGCM 的假设在很大程度上是普遍的,但有几个关系似乎在文化上有所不同。理论意义进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural similarities and differences in the theoretical predictors of cyberbullying perpetration: Results from a seven-country study.跨文化视角下,网络欺凌行为的理论预测因素的异同:来自七个国家的研究结果。
Aggress Behav. 2021 Jan;47(1):111-119. doi: 10.1002/ab.21923. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Predicting cyberbullying perpetration in emerging adults: A theoretical test of the Barlett Gentile Cyberbullying Model.预测新兴成年人中的网络欺凌行为:对巴利特·詹蒂莱网络欺凌模型的理论检验。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Apr;43(2):147-154. doi: 10.1002/ab.21670. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
3
Cyberbullying process in US adolescents and their parents: Testing and extending the Barlett Gentile cyberbullying model.美国青少年及其父母中的网络欺凌过程:检验和扩展巴特利特·詹蒂莱网络欺凌模型。
Aggress Behav. 2024 Jan;50(1):e22117. doi: 10.1002/ab.22117. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Muscles, popularity, social capital, and computer skills: Examining "power" in cyberbullying.肌肉、人气、社会资本和计算机技能:审视网络欺凌中的“权力”。
Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):608-615. doi: 10.1002/ab.22047. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
5
Theoretically Predicting Cyberbullying Perpetration in Youth With the BGCM: Unique Challenges and Promising Research Opportunities.运用BGCM理论预测青少年网络欺凌行为:独特挑战与前景广阔的研究机遇
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:708277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708277. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparing cyberbullying prevalence and process before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.比较新冠疫情前后网络欺凌的流行程度和发生过程。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 4;161(4):408-418. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1918619. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
Learning to cyberbully: Longitudinal relations between cyberbullying attitudes and perpetration and the moderating influence of participant sex: A brief report.学习网络欺凌:网络欺凌态度和行为与参与者性别之间的纵向关系及其调节作用:简要报告。
Aggress Behav. 2023 Sep;49(5):547-553. doi: 10.1002/ab.22089. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
Differences in Friendship Networks and Experiences of Cyberbullying Among Korean and Australian Adolescents.韩国和澳大利亚青少年的友谊网络差异与网络欺凌经历
J Genet Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;178(1):44-57. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2016.1242475. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
Longitudinal cross-lagged analyses between cyberbullying perpetration, mindfulness and depression among Chinese high school students.中国高中生网络欺凌行为、正念与抑郁的纵向交叉滞后分析。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Sep;26(11):1872-1881. doi: 10.1177/1359105319890395. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.澳大利亚儿童和青少年中传统欺凌和网络欺凌的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;53(9):878-888. doi: 10.1177/0004867419846393. Epub 2019 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of adolescents' emotions and emotion regulation strategies when witnessing different cyberbullying scenarios.目睹不同网络欺凌场景时青少年情绪及情绪调节策略的比较分析
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 17;10(9):e29705. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29705. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
A neurocomputational variable on welfare tradeoffs explains the function and form of cyberaggression.一个关于福利权衡的神经计算变量解释了网络攻击的功能和形式。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jul 27;17:1034564. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1034564. eCollection 2023.
3
Understanding Cyber-Racism Perpetration within the Broader Context of Cyberbullying Theory: A Theoretical Integration.
在网络欺凌理论的更广泛背景下理解网络种族主义行为:一种理论整合
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 1;10(7):1156. doi: 10.3390/children10071156.
4
Cyberbullying as a Learned Behavior: Theoretical and Applied Implications.网络欺凌作为一种习得行为:理论与应用启示
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;10(2):325. doi: 10.3390/children10020325.
5
Onset risk factors for youth involvement in cyberbullying and cybervictimization: A longitudinal study.青少年卷入网络欺凌和网络受害的发病风险因素:一项纵向研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1090047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1090047. eCollection 2022.
6
Aggressive humor style and cyberbullying perpetration: Normative tolerance and moral disengagement perspective.攻击性幽默风格与网络欺凌行为:规范容忍度与道德推脱视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1095318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095318. eCollection 2022.
7
Childhood emotional abuse and cyberbullying perpetration among Chinese university students: The chain mediating effects of self-esteem and problematic social media use.中国大学生童年期情感虐待与网络欺凌行为:自尊和社交媒体使用问题的链式中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1036128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036128. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing Cyberbullying in Adolescence: New Evidence for the Spanish Version of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (ECIP-Q).评估青少年网络欺凌:西班牙版欧洲网络欺凌干预项目问卷(ECIP-Q)的新证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 30;19(21):14196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114196.
9
Testing a first online intervention to reduce conformity to cyber aggression in messaging apps.测试一种减少即时通讯应用程序中网络欺凌行为从众的首个在线干预措施。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 9;17(8):e0272615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272615. eCollection 2022.
10
Understanding Motivation, Career Planning, and Socio-Cultural Adaptation Difficulties as Determinants of Higher Education Institution Choice Decision by International Students in the Post-pandemic Era.理解动机、职业规划和社会文化适应困难作为后疫情时代国际学生选择高等教育机构决策的决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 14;13:955234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955234. eCollection 2022.