Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病成人中不基于骨密度的骨折风险评估(FRAX)与主要骨质疏松性骨折风险。

Fracture risk assessment (FRAX) without BMD and risk of major osteoporotic fractures in adults with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States of America.

Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States of America.

出版信息

Bone. 2021 Feb;143:115614. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115614. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) and risk for major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) in type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Subjects with type 1 diabetes and without diabetes from the 'Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes' study were included. Risk for MOF was calculated using FRAX-based clinical risk factors and without BMD at visit 3 (2006-2008). Incident fractures were defined as fractures that occurred between visit 3 and visit 4 (2013-2017). Survival models were used to study the predictability of new MOF by diabetes status.

RESULTS

346 type 1 diabetes (mean age 43.3 ± 9, BMI 26.4 ± 5, diabetes duration 29.4 ± 8.6 years, A1c 7.8 ± 1.1) and 411 controls (mean age 46.9 ± 9 years, BMI 26.3 ± 5 kg/m, A1c 5.5 ± 0.4) were analyzed in this study. In unadjusted survival analysis, the FRAX score without BMD was significantly associated with MOF (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13, p < 0.0001), and remained significantly associated after adjustment for age and sex (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.15, p = 0.0007) and type 1 diabetes (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12, p = 0.0002). In the fully adjusted model (adjusted for age, sex and type 1 diabetes), the FRAX score without BMD was the only variable significantly associated with risk of MOF (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Clinical use of FRAX without BMD is useful tool in identifying adults with type 1 diabetes at higher risk for MOF risk and may help clinicians to guide therapeutic decision-making in this high fracture risk population.

摘要

目的

评估不基于骨密度(BMD)的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)与 1 型糖尿病患者发生主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的风险之间的关联。

方法

纳入“1 型糖尿病冠状动脉钙化研究”中的 1 型糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者。在第三次就诊(2006-2008 年)时,使用基于 FRAX 的临床危险因素和无 BMD 计算 MOF 风险。在第四次就诊(2013-2017 年)之间发生的骨折定义为新发骨折。生存模型用于研究糖尿病状态对新发 MOF 的预测能力。

结果

本研究共分析了 346 例 1 型糖尿病患者(平均年龄 43.3±9 岁,BMI 26.4±5kg/m2,糖尿病病程 29.4±8.6 年,A1c 7.8±1.1%)和 411 例对照者(平均年龄 46.9±9 岁,BMI 26.3±5kg/m2,A1c 5.5±0.4%)。在未调整的生存分析中,不基于 BMD 的 FRAX 评分与 MOF 显著相关(HR 1.08,95%CI:1.04-1.13,p<0.0001),并且在调整年龄和性别(HR 1.09,95%CI:1.04-1.15,p=0.0007)以及 1 型糖尿病(HR 1.08,95%CI:1.04-1.12,p=0.0002)后仍然显著相关。在完全调整模型(调整年龄、性别和 1 型糖尿病)中,不基于 BMD 的 FRAX 评分是唯一与 MOF 风险显著相关的变量(HR 1.08,95%CI:1.02-1.14,p=0.006)。

结论

不基于 BMD 的 FRAX 的临床应用是识别 1 型糖尿病患者 MOF 风险较高的有用工具,可能有助于临床医生在这一高骨折风险人群中指导治疗决策。

相似文献

6
Administrative healthcare data applied to fracture risk assessment.行政医疗保健数据应用于骨折风险评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):565-571. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4780-6. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验