Suppr超能文献

在多民族糖尿病患者群体中,不使用骨密度的FRAX在预测骨折风险时的偏差:糖尿病与衰老研究

Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study.

作者信息

Jain Rajesh K, Liu Jennifer Y, Grant Richard W, Haider Shanzay, Huang Elbert S, Laiteerapong Neda, Lipska Kasia J, Lo Joan C, Moffet Howard H, Parker Melissa M, Karter Andrew J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 2025 Apr 21;40(4):478-491. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf012.

Abstract

Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), calculate the risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture but do not account for the excess risk of fracture in people with diabetes. We examined the predictive performance of FRAX without BMD in ethnically diverse, older patients with diabetes. Patients included were between ages 65 and 89 from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry and not already taking osteoporosis medications. Race and ethnicity were self-identified. We calculated FRAX without BMD based on baseline characteristics and assessed how well FRAX predicted MOF and hip fracture over follow-up. Predictive performance was based on measures of discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve, AUC) and calibration (observed-to-predicted ratio, O/P). We identified 96 914 patients (47.0% female), of whom 5383 (5.6%) and 1767 (1.8%) had MOF and hip fracture, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr. The AUC for MOF and hip fracture were 0.72 and 0.77, respectively. FRAX mildly underestimated MOF and hip fracture rates (O/P 1.2 for both) overall. Discrimination was similar by race and ethnicity and diabetes duration but was worse in those over age 75 (AUC < 0.7). In some groups, there were substantial calibration errors, such as Hispanic women (O/P: 1.8 and 1.5), Black men (O/P: 1.5 and 1.8), those with duration of diabetes ≥20 yr (O/P: 1.6 and 1.5), and those over the age of 80 (O/P: 1.4 and 1.2) for MOF and hip fracture, respectively. While the discriminatory performance of FRAX without BMD was good overall in patients with diabetes, it underestimated risk in Hispanic women, Black men, those with long duration of diabetes, and in the oldest patients with diabetes. These algorithmic biases suggest that diabetes-specific tools may be needed to stratify fracture risk in patients with diabetes.

摘要

骨折风险计算器,如骨折风险评估工具(FRAX),可计算主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)和髋部骨折的风险,但未考虑糖尿病患者额外的骨折风险。我们在种族多样的老年糖尿病患者中研究了不使用骨密度(BMD)的FRAX的预测性能。纳入的患者年龄在65至89岁之间,来自北加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗集团糖尿病登记处,且尚未服用骨质疏松药物。种族和族裔由患者自我认定。我们根据基线特征计算不使用BMD的FRAX,并评估FRAX在随访期间对MOF和髋部骨折的预测效果。预测性能基于区分度(受试者工作特征曲线下面积,AUC)和校准度(观察值与预测值之比,O/P)进行衡量。我们确定了96914名患者(47.0%为女性),在平均4.3年的随访期间,分别有5383名(5.6%)和1767名(1.8%)发生了MOF和髋部骨折。MOF和髋部骨折的AUC分别为0.72和0.77。总体而言,FRAX轻度低估了MOF和髋部骨折发生率(两者的O/P均为1.2)。按种族、族裔和糖尿病病程划分,区分度相似,但在75岁以上患者中区分度较差(AUC<0.7)。在一些群体中,存在显著的校准误差,如西班牙裔女性(MOF和髋部骨折的O/P分别为1.8和1.5)、黑人男性(MOF和髋部骨折的O/P分别为1.5和1.8)、糖尿病病程≥20年的患者(MOF和髋部骨折的O/P分别为1.6和1.5)以及80岁以上患者(MOF和髋部骨折的O/P分别为1.4和1.2)。虽然不使用BMD的FRAX在糖尿病患者中的区分性能总体良好,但它低估了西班牙裔女性、黑人男性、糖尿病病程长的患者以及年龄最大的糖尿病患者的风险。这些算法偏差表明,可能需要针对糖尿病的工具来对糖尿病患者的骨折风险进行分层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验