Suppr超能文献

对脑损伤后患者行走时异常上肢运动的量化评估。

Quantification of abnormal upper limb movement during walking in people with acquired brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Epworth Rehabilitation, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia; School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia.

Department of Physiotherapy, Epworth Rehabilitation, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia; School of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.08.110. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abnormal upper limb movements frequently affect people with acquired brain injury (ABI) during walking. Three-dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) can quantify upper limb abnormality kinematically, with composite scores condensing multiple joint axes data into a single score.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are 3DMA-derived composite scores valid (known-groups and convergent validity), reliable and able to quantify speed-related changes in abnormal upper limb movement during walking?

METHODS

This observational study compared 42 adults with ABI and abnormal upper limb movements during walking with 36 healthy controls (HC) at a matched walking speed intention. Participants underwent 3DMA assessment of self-selected and fast walking speeds. Composite scores quantified the affected upper limb's kinematic abnormality. The Arm Posture Score arithmetic mean version (APSam) and 1.96 standard deviation reference-range scaled versions; the Kinematic Deviation Score mean (KDSm) and worst score (KDSw) were evaluated for association with each other and subjective abnormality rating (Pearson's 'r' correlation), test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)), and ability to quantify speed-related changes in abnormal upper limb movement (Cohen's d effect size (ES), % change scores).

RESULTS

Very strong correlations existed between composite scores. The KDSm under-classified upper limb abnormality, whereas the KDSw captured the majority of ABI participants. All scores had moderate-strong correlations with subjective rating of abnormal upper limb movements (r = 0.54 - 0.79) and very strong test-retest reliability (ICCs > 0.81). The APSam demonstrated a 16% (ES = 0.76) walking speed-related increase in upper limb abnormality, whilst decreases were demonstrated in the KDSm 26% (ES 0.90) and KDSw 35% (ES 0.96).

SIGNIFICANCE

The APSam, KDSw, and number of abnormal joint axes comprehensively assess the whole upper limb abnormal movements, accurately classifies abnormality, and quantifies severity. This study illustrated notable presence of abnormal upper limb movements at self-selected walking speed and small increase at fast speeds. However, when scaled to HC variability, the fast walk kinematics became less abnormal due to increased HC movement variability.

摘要

背景

异常的上肢运动在人行走时经常影响获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者。三维运动分析(3DMA)可以对上肢异常运动进行运动学定量,综合评分将多个关节轴数据综合为一个单一的评分。

研究问题

3DMA 衍生的综合评分是否具有有效性(已知组和收敛效度)、可靠性,以及能否量化行走时异常上肢运动的与速度相关的变化?

方法

本观察性研究将 42 名 ABI 患者与 36 名健康对照(HC)在匹配的行走速度意向下进行比较。参与者进行了自我选择和快速行走速度的 3DMA 评估。综合评分量化了受影响上肢的运动学异常。评估了上肢姿势评分算术平均值版本(APSam)和 1.96 标准差参考范围的缩放版本;运动偏差评分平均值(KDSm)和最差评分(KDSw),评估彼此之间以及与主观异常评级的关联(皮尔逊 'r' 相关系数)、测试-重测可靠性(组内相关系数(ICC)),以及量化异常上肢运动与速度相关的变化的能力(Cohen's d 效应量(ES),%变化评分)。

结果

综合评分之间存在很强的相关性。KDSm 低估了上肢异常,而 KDSw 则捕捉到了大多数 ABI 参与者。所有评分与主观异常上肢运动评级(r = 0.54 - 0.79)具有中度到高度相关性,并且测试-重测可靠性很强(ICC > 0.81)。APSam 显示上肢异常的行走速度相关增加 16%(ES = 0.76),而 KDSm 下降 26%(ES = 0.90),KDSw 下降 35%(ES = 0.96)。

意义

APSam、KDSw 和异常关节轴的数量全面评估整个上肢异常运动,准确分类异常,并量化严重程度。本研究表明,在自我选择的行走速度下,上肢异常运动明显存在,而在快速行走速度下,上肢异常运动的增加幅度较小。然而,当与 HC 的变异性进行比较时,由于 HC 运动变异性增加,快速行走的运动学变得不那么异常。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验