Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitative Sciences, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences , San Marcos, California, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Gachon University , Incheon, Korea.
Women Health. 2020 Nov-Dec;60(10):1185-1195. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1807449. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
Females and males differ significantly in gross anatomy and physiology of the pelvic floor muscle, and these differences are commonly discussed in the scientific literature. However, less attention is dedicated to investigating the normative values of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function between females and males. Our study aims to describe the normal reference values of PFM function in females and males of a healthy adult population using transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS). A total of 200 healthy adults, including 71 males and 129 females consented to participate in this study. Bladder base displacement was measured using a sagittal curved linear array 2-5 MHz transducer over the suprapubic region. The amount of bladder base movement on ultrasound was measured in all subjects from freeze frame ultrasound images and considered as an indicator of PFM function. The average age of subjects was (26.1 ± 2.6 years), (24.4 ± 3.7 BMI). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in transabdominal ultrasound measurement for PFM function ( = .00000). The bladder base displacement was significantly greater in males compared to females (0.65 ± 0.42 vs. 0.38 ± 0.35, <.001, 95% CI:0.16-0.38). The present study provides evidence of a gender-related PFM functional differences creating a baseline for the clinic to establish the normal percentile values of PFM function.
女性和男性在盆底肌肉的大体解剖和生理学上存在显著差异,这些差异在科学文献中经常被讨论。然而,对于女性和男性盆底肌肉(PFM)功能的正常参考值的研究关注较少。我们的研究旨在使用经腹超声(TAUS)描述健康成年人群中女性和男性 PFM 功能的正常参考值。共有 200 名健康成年人,包括 71 名男性和 129 名女性同意参与这项研究。使用耻骨上方区域的矢状弯曲线性阵列 2-5 MHz 换能器测量膀胱基底位移。从冻结帧超声图像测量所有受试者的膀胱基底运动量,并将其视为 PFM 功能的指标。受试者的平均年龄为(26.1 ± 2.6 岁),(24.4 ± 3.7 BMI)。统计分析显示,PFM 功能的经腹超声测量存在显著差异( = 0.00000)。男性的膀胱基底位移明显大于女性(0.65 ± 0.42 比 0.38 ± 0.35,<0.001,95%CI:0.16-0.38)。本研究提供了与性别相关的 PFM 功能差异的证据,为临床建立 PFM 功能的正常百分位数值奠定了基础。