Ketcheson Leah, Felzer-Kim Isabella Theresa, Hauck Janet L
Wayne State University.
Michigan State University.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2021 Dec;92(4):813-823. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1788205. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
: There is a relationship between motor and language skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), but little work addresses the ramifications of this relationship for professionals who teach motor skills to this population. Within a motor skills intervention, this study probed the importance of language skills for motor intervention. We examined the relationship between motor and language skills at baseline, and then the relationship between baseline language skills and motor improvements resulting from the intervention. : Twenty children aged 4-6 years with ASD participated. Eleven children received 20 hr per week of motor intervention for 8 weeks. Nine children did not receive motor intervention. Language skills (Mullen Scales of Early Learning) and motor skills (Test of Gross Motor Development - 2) were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Spearman correlations tested the associations between baseline language and baseline motor skills. This analysis was repeated in the intervention sample to test the association between baseline language level and response to intervention (motor skill changes from baseline to post-intervention). : Prior to intervention, locomotor skills are positively correlated (p < .001) with both receptive (rs = 0.827) and expressive (rs = 0.722) language skills. Similarly, object-control skills are positively correlated (rs < .001) with receptive (rs = 0.779) and expressive (rs = 0.729) language skills. However, those baseline language skills do not relate to motor change in the experimental group. : These results suggest that motor programs may improve motor skills in children with ASD when language is supported, regardless of pre-program language ability.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的运动技能和语言技能之间存在关联,但很少有研究探讨这种关联对为该群体教授运动技能的专业人员的影响。在一项运动技能干预中,本研究探讨了语言技能对运动干预的重要性。我们在基线时检查了运动技能和语言技能之间的关系,然后检查了基线语言技能与干预后运动技能改善之间的关系。
20名4至6岁的ASD儿童参与了研究。11名儿童每周接受20小时的运动干预,为期8周。9名儿童未接受运动干预。在基线和干预后评估语言技能(早期学习穆伦量表)和运动技能(大肌肉发展测试-2)。使用斯皮尔曼相关性检验来测试基线语言和基线运动技能之间的关联。在干预样本中重复此分析,以测试基线语言水平与干预反应(从基线到干预后运动技能的变化)之间的关联。
干预前,运动技能与接受性(rs = 0.827)和表达性(rs = 0.722)语言技能均呈正相关(p <.001)。同样,物体控制技能与接受性(rs = 0.779)和表达性(rs = 0.729)语言技能呈正相关(rs <.001)。然而,这些基线语言技能与实验组的运动变化无关。
这些结果表明,当语言得到支持时,运动程序可能会提高ASD儿童的运动技能,而与程序前的语言能力无关。