持续给予胃饥饿素可减轻食管癌患者术后的炎症反应。
Continuous ghrelin infusion attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response in patients with esophageal cancer.
机构信息
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
出版信息
Esophagus. 2021 Apr;18(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00776-z. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to clarify whether ghrelin infusion is useful for suppressing inflammatory responses after esophagectomy.
METHODS
A phase I study of ghrelin administration after esophagectomy was performed in 20 patients with esophageal cancer. The anti-inflammatory effect of ghrelin was compared with 20 consecutive patients who did not receive ghrelin infusion. Additionally, 10 patients with intermittent infusion for 10 days were compared with 10 patients with continuous infusion for 5 days. The primary endpoint was the duration of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Secondary endpoints included postoperative complications, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and growth hormone (GH) levels.
RESULTS
No adverse events of ghrelin administration occurred. Patients with ghrelin infusion had higher plasma ghrelin levels on postoperative day (POD) 3 (p = 0.003) and shorter SIRS duration (p = 0.007) than patients without ghrelin infusion. Although SIRS duration was similar (p = 0.19), patients with continuous ghrelin infusion had significantly higher plasma ghrelin (p < 0.001) and GH levels (p = 0.002) on POD 3 than patients with intermittent ghrelin infusion. Serum CRP and IL-6 levels on POD 3 tended to be lower in the continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion group.
CONCLUSIONS
Ghrelin was safely administered after esophagectomy and may reduce excess postoperative inflammatory responses. Continuous infusion is better for this purpose than intermittent infusion.
目的
本研究旨在阐明生长激素释放肽(ghrelin)输注是否有助于抑制食管癌手术后的炎症反应。
方法
对 20 例食管癌患者进行了手术后给予生长激素释放肽的 I 期研究。将生长激素释放肽的抗炎作用与未接受生长激素释放肽输注的 20 例连续患者进行比较。此外,将 10 例接受 10 天间歇性输注的患者与 10 例接受 5 天连续输注的患者进行比较。主要终点是全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的持续时间。次要终点包括术后并发症、血清 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和生长激素(GH)水平。
结果
生长激素释放肽给药无不良反应。与未接受生长激素释放肽输注的患者相比,接受生长激素释放肽输注的患者术后第 3 天(POD3)的血浆生长激素释放肽水平更高(p=0.003),SIRS 持续时间更短(p=0.007)。尽管 SIRS 持续时间相似(p=0.19),但连续生长激素释放肽输注的患者在 POD3 时的血浆生长激素释放肽(p<0.001)和 GH 水平(p=0.002)明显更高。与间歇性生长激素释放肽输注相比,POD3 时的血清 CRP 和 IL-6 水平在连续输注组中趋于较低。
结论
生长激素释放肽在食管癌手术后安全给药,可能减少术后过度的炎症反应。与间歇性输注相比,连续输注效果更好。