Suppr超能文献

晚期胃腺癌患者采用 FOLFOX 和改良 DCF 化疗方案的疗效。

Outcome of FOLFOX and Modified DCF Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Aug 1;21(8):2337-2341. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2337.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Chemotherapy is used as an indispensable therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Different chemotherapy regimens have been used for this purpose. Toxicity due to the Chemotherapy drugs is one limiting factor. In this study we aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens FOLFOX (leucoverin, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) and modified DCF (mDCF) (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

In this analytical cross-sectional study, 47 patients treated with FOLFOX regimen and 57 patients treated with mDCF regimen were recruited, Patients in both groups were compared for demographic findings, response rate, mortality rate, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In FOLFOX and mDCF group, complete response (CR) occurred in 4.3% and 5.3%, partial response (PR) in 42.6% and 29.8%, stable disease in 34% and 52.6% and disease progression in 19.1% and 12.3%, respectively (p=0.25). Overall response rate was 48.9% and 56.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference between two regimens in OS and PFS (p=0.22). mDCF compared to FOLFOX had significantly higher hematologic, gastrointestinal complications, as well as creatinine rise, stomatitis and hair loss, but peripheral neuropathy was significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

The results of current study showed that in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, FOLFOX regimen compared to mDCF regimen have similar ORR, OS and PFS. Toxicity rate are also lower in FOLFOX group, thus it seems a better regimen for chemotherapy.
.

摘要

目的

化疗被用作晚期胃癌不可或缺的治疗方法。为此目的已经使用了不同的化疗方案。化疗药物的毒性是一个限制因素。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较 FOLFOX(亚叶酸钙、5-氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂)和改良 DCF(mDCF)(多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶)两种方案在晚期胃腺癌患者中的疗效和毒性。

方法

在这项分析性横断面研究中,招募了接受 FOLFOX 方案治疗的 47 例患者和接受 mDCF 方案治疗的 57 例患者,比较了两组患者的人口统计学发现、缓解率、死亡率、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

在 FOLFOX 和 mDCF 组中,完全缓解(CR)分别为 4.3%和 5.3%,部分缓解(PR)分别为 42.6%和 29.8%,稳定疾病分别为 34%和 52.6%,疾病进展分别为 19.1%和 12.3%(p=0.25)。总体缓解率分别为 48.9%和 56.1%。两种方案在 OS 和 PFS 方面无显著差异(p=0.22)。与 FOLFOX 相比,mDCF 方案具有更高的血液学、胃肠道并发症以及肌酐升高、口腔炎和脱发,但周围神经病变发生率较低。

结论

本研究结果表明,在晚期胃腺癌患者中,FOLFOX 方案与 mDCF 方案相比,ORR、OS 和 PFS 相似。FOLFOX 组的毒性发生率也较低,因此它似乎是一种更好的化疗方案。

相似文献

1
Outcome of FOLFOX and Modified DCF Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Aug 1;21(8):2337-2341. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2337.
8
Dose-finding study of modified FLOT (mFLOT) regimen as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;85(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03982-4. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of mFOLFOX-6 and mDCF regimens in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 30;17:17588359251368069. doi: 10.1177/17588359251368069. eCollection 2025.
7
First-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022 Sep 16;22(5):818-825. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.7069.
8

本文引用的文献

1
[Clinical Efficacy of mFOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2020 Jan;47(1):49-53.
2
A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies.
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2853-2864. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01358-2. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Comparison the Incidence and Severity of Side Effects Profile Of FOLFOX and DCF Regimens in Gastric Cancer Patients.
Iran J Pharm Res. 2019 Spring;18(2):1032-1039. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100663.
5
Comparison of FOLFOX and DOF regimens as first-line treatment in East Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Jan 17;11:375-381. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S149624. eCollection 2018.
10
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验