• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison the Incidence and Severity of Side Effects Profile Of FOLFOX and DCF Regimens in Gastric Cancer Patients.比较FOLFOX和DCF方案在胃癌患者中副作用情况的发生率和严重程度。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2019 Spring;18(2):1032-1039. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100663.
2
Outcome evaluation of ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, and FLOT chemotherapy regimens as perioperative treatment in elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer; A retrospective comparative study.ECF、DCF、FOLFOX和FLOT化疗方案作为可切除老年胃癌患者围手术期治疗的疗效评估:一项回顾性比较研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2023 Nov 30;28:79. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_417_22. eCollection 2023.
3
Efficacy and safety of FLOT regimen DCF, FOLFOX, and ECF regimens as perioperative chemotherapy treatments for resectable gastric cancer patients; a report from the middle east.FLOT方案、DCF方案、FOLFOX方案和ECF方案作为可切除胃癌患者围手术期化疗治疗的疗效和安全性:来自中东的报告。
Res Pharm Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(6):621-634. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.359430. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
[Comparison of the toxicities and efficacies of the combination chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer patients who achieved complete response after chemotherapy].[晚期胃癌患者化疗后达到完全缓解的联合化疗方案的毒性和疗效比较]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec;58(6):311-7. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2011.58.6.311.
5
Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX-6 and DCF regimens as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer.改良FOLFOX-6方案与DCF方案作为晚期胃癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性比较分析
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;3(5):1160-1164. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.592. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
Evaluation of Pathological Response Rate and Complications of FOLFOX versus FLOT Regimen in Perioperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Study.FOLFOX 方案与 FLOT 方案用于可切除胃癌围手术期化疗的病理缓解率和并发症评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):2791-2797. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.8.2791.
7
Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma (Epitopes-HPV02): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study.多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶化疗治疗转移性或不可切除的局部复发性肛门鳞状细胞癌(Epitopes-HPV02):一项多中心、单臂、Ⅱ期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1094-1106. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30321-8. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
8
Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil compared with Modified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of single institution.多西他赛和顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶与改良多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶作为一线治疗晚期胃癌的比较:单中心回顾性分析。
Neoplasma. 2012;59(2):233-6. doi: 10.4149/neo_2012_030.
9
A comparative analysis on clinical efficacy of FOLFOX6 regimen and DCF regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical gastrectomy in treating advanced gastric cancer.FOLFOX6方案与DCF方案作为新辅助化疗联合根治性胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的临床疗效比较分析
J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):2006-2012.
10
Evaluation of the toxicity of anticancer chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer.结肠癌患者抗癌化疗毒性评估
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;24(1):103-11. doi: 10.17219/acem/38154.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing care for gastric cancer with overt bleeding: Is systemic therapy a valid option?优化对伴有明显出血的胃癌的治疗:全身治疗是一种有效的选择吗?
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 24;16(1):100943. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i1.100943.
2
Systematic treatment in gastric cancer patients with overt bleeding: A propensity score matching analysis.胃癌显性出血患者的系统治疗:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep 24;15(9):1177-1187. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1177.
3
Duodenal adenocarcinoma at stage IV: A critical look at diagnostic pathways and treatment modalities.IV期十二指肠腺癌:对诊断途径和治疗方式的批判性审视。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Aug 7;19(10):4662-4669. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.07.090. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Prognostic impact of shift to low visceral fat mass after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.新辅助化疗后内脏脂肪质量降低对食管癌患者预后的影响。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Aug;7(8):e2084. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2084.
5
Ameliorative Potential of L-Alanyl L-Glutamine Dipeptide in Colon Cancer Patients Receiving Modified FOLFOX-6 Regarding the Incidence of Diarrhea, the Treatment Response, and Patients' Survival: A Randomized Controlled Trial.L-丙氨酰-L-谷氨酰胺二肽对接受改良 FOLFOX-6 方案治疗的结肠癌患者腹泻发生率、治疗反应和患者生存的改善作用:一项随机对照试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 7;58(3):394. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030394.
6
Diosmetin Exerts Synergistic Effects in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in Colorectal Cancer Cells.香叶木素与5-氟尿嘧啶联合对结肠癌细胞发挥协同作用。
Biomedicines. 2022 Feb 24;10(3):531. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030531.
7
Outcome of FOLFOX and Modified DCF Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma.晚期胃腺癌患者采用 FOLFOX 和改良 DCF 化疗方案的疗效。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Aug 1;21(8):2337-2341. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2337.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX-6 and DCF regimens as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer.改良FOLFOX-6方案与DCF方案作为晚期胃癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性比较分析
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;3(5):1160-1164. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.592. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
2
Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line palliative chemotherapy with EOX and mDCF regimens in patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase 3 trial.EOX与mDCF方案一线姑息化疗用于局部晚期不可切除或转移性HER2阴性胃或胃食管交界腺癌患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机3期试验
Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):242. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0687-7. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
3
Efficacy and safety of docetaxel or epirubicin, combined with cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF and ECF), regimens as first line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis from Turkey.多西他赛或表柔比星联合顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(DCF和ECF)方案作为晚期胃癌一线化疗的疗效和安全性:来自土耳其的一项回顾性分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(16):6727-32. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.16.6727.
4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 regimen to treat advanced gastric cancer improves survival without increasing adverse events: a retrospective cohort study from a Chinese center.采用FOLFOX4方案新辅助化疗治疗晚期胃癌可提高生存率且不增加不良事件:一项来自中国中心的回顾性队列研究
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:418694. doi: 10.1155/2014/418694. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
5
Comparison of short-term efficacy and safety of TIROX and DCF regimens for advanced gastric cancer.替吉奥(TIROX)与DCF方案治疗晚期胃癌的短期疗效及安全性比较
J Int Med Res. 2014 Jun;42(3):737-43. doi: 10.1177/0300060513510657. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
6
Worldwide trends in gastric cancer mortality (1980-2011), with predictions to 2015, and incidence by subtype.全球胃癌死亡率趋势(1980-2011 年),预测至 2015 年,以及各亚型的发病率。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 May;50(7):1330-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
FOLFOX versus EOX as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer.FOLFOX与EOX作为晚期胃癌患者新辅助化疗方案的比较。
Exp Ther Med. 2014 Feb;7(2):461-467. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1449. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
8
No improvement in median survival for patients with metastatic gastric cancer despite increased use of chemotherapy.尽管化疗的应用有所增加,但转移性胃癌患者的中位生存期并无改善。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24(12):3056-60. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt401. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines.胃癌临床实践指南(2013 年版):NCCN 指南的重点更新内容。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 May 1;11(5):531-46. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0070.
10
Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) regimen compared with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多西紫杉醇、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(DCF)方案与非紫杉烷类姑息化疗治疗胃癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 4;8(4):e60320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060320. Print 2013.

比较FOLFOX和DCF方案在胃癌患者中副作用情况的发生率和严重程度。

Comparison the Incidence and Severity of Side Effects Profile Of FOLFOX and DCF Regimens in Gastric Cancer Patients.

作者信息

Salehifar Ebrahim, Avan Razieh, Janbabaei Ghasem, Mousavi Seyed Khalil, Faramarzi Fatemeh

机构信息

Board certified Clinical Pharmacist, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Board Certified Pharmacotherapy Specialist, Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, Medical Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research Center (MTDRC), Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Pharm Res. 2019 Spring;18(2):1032-1039. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100663.

DOI:10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100663
PMID:31531083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6706736/
Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fourth common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Due to lack of adequate information on the side effects of chemotherapy regimens in treatment of gastric cancer, this study was aimed to determine the side effects of two common chemotherapy regimens of gastric cancer. This prospective study was conducted in Emam Khomeini Educational Hospital and Touba Polyclinic; both are affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. The frequency and severity of side effects of chemotherapy were recorded based on the National Cancer Institution (NCI) Toxicity Criteria (version 2). DCF (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5FU) and FOLFOX (Folinic acid, 5FU, Oxaliplatin) adverse reactions were compared using SPSS 16 software. One hundred twenty five chemotherapy cycles administered to seventy four patients were assessed. The most common used regimens were DCF (70%) and FOLFOX (16%). The incidence of vomiting was higher with DCF compared to FOLFOX (P = 0.049). In more than 50% of cycles, DCF regimen caused diarrhea, while in FOLFOX regimen it was less than 9% (P = 0.002). Stomatitis, visual changes, nausea, skin reactions, and constipation were not significantly different between the two regimens. It seems that the adverse drug reactions of FOLFOX regimen were more favorable than DCF regimen. The results of this study may help clinicians choosing a more favorable chemotherapy regimen especially in patients with a low performance status who have difficulties in tolerating a chemotherapy regimen with a more severe adverse effect profile.

摘要

胃癌是全球第四大常见癌症,也是癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。由于缺乏关于化疗方案治疗胃癌副作用的充分信息,本研究旨在确定两种常见胃癌化疗方案的副作用。这项前瞻性研究在伊玛目霍梅尼教育医院和图巴综合诊所进行;这两家机构均隶属于马赞德兰医科大学。化疗副作用的频率和严重程度根据美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)毒性标准(第2版)进行记录。使用SPSS 16软件比较DCF(多西他赛、顺铂、5-氟尿嘧啶)和FOLFOX(亚叶酸、5-氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂)的不良反应。对74例患者进行的125个化疗周期进行了评估。最常用的方案是DCF(70%)和FOLFOX(16%)。与FOLFOX相比,DCF引起呕吐的发生率更高(P = 0.049)。在超过50%的周期中,DCF方案导致腹泻,而在FOLFOX方案中这一比例低于9%(P = 0.002)。两种方案在口腔炎、视觉变化、恶心、皮肤反应和便秘方面无显著差异。似乎FOLFOX方案的药物不良反应比DCF方案更有利。本研究结果可能有助于临床医生选择更有利的化疗方案,尤其是对于那些身体状况较差、难以耐受副作用更严重的化疗方案的患者。