• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察大麻合法化与致命机动车和行人卷入的撞车事故之间的关系。

An examination of relationships between cannabis legalization and fatal motor vehicle and pedestrian-involved crashes.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(8):521-526. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1810246. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2020.1810246
PMID:32856949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7709737/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While attention has been given to how legalization of recreational cannabis affects traffic crash rates, there was been limited research on how cannabis affects pedestrians involved in traffic crashes. This study examined the association between cannabis legalization (medical, recreational use, and recreational sales) and fatal motor vehicle crash rates (both pedestrian-involved and total fatal crashes).

METHODS

We used crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) to calculate monthly rates of fatal motor vehicle crashes and fatal pedestrian-involved crashes per 100,000 people from 1991 to 2018. Changes in monthly crash rates in three states that had legalized cannabis (Colorado, Washington, and Oregon) were compared to matched control states using segmented regression with autoregressive terms.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in pedestrian-involved fatal motor vehicle crashes between legalized cannabis states and control states following medical or recreational cannabis legalization. Washington and Oregon saw immediate decreases in all fatal crashes (-4.15 and -6.60) following medical cannabis legalization. Colorado showed an increase in trend for all fatal crashes after recreational cannabis legalization and the beginning of sales (0.15 and 0.18 monthly fatal crashes per 100,000 people).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall findings do not suggest an elevated risk of total or pedestrian-involved fatal motor vehicle crashes associated with cannabis legalization.

摘要

目的

虽然人们已经关注到娱乐用大麻合法化如何影响交通事故率,但对于大麻如何影响涉及交通事故的行人,研究仍十分有限。本研究调查了大麻合法化(医用、娱乐用和娱乐用销售)与致命机动车碰撞率(行人参与的和总致命碰撞)之间的关联。

方法

我们使用来自致命事故分析报告系统(FARS)的碰撞数据,计算了 1991 年至 2018 年期间每 10 万人中致命机动车碰撞和致命行人参与碰撞的每月发生率。使用具有自回归项的分段回归比较了三个大麻合法化的州(科罗拉多州、华盛顿州和俄勒冈州)与匹配的对照州的每月碰撞率变化。

结果

在医用或娱乐用大麻合法化后,我们在合法化大麻的州和对照州之间没有发现行人参与的致命机动车碰撞的显著差异。在医用大麻合法化后,华盛顿州和俄勒冈州的所有致命碰撞立即减少(-4.15 和-6.60)。科罗拉多州在娱乐用大麻合法化和销售开始后,所有致命碰撞的趋势呈上升趋势(每 10 万人每月增加 0.15 和 0.18 起致命碰撞)。

结论

总体结果表明,大麻合法化与总致命或行人参与的致命机动车碰撞风险升高无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/7709737/f40c97ce20cc/nihms-1648312-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/7709737/f40c97ce20cc/nihms-1648312-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/7709737/f40c97ce20cc/nihms-1648312-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
An examination of relationships between cannabis legalization and fatal motor vehicle and pedestrian-involved crashes.考察大麻合法化与致命机动车和行人卷入的撞车事故之间的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(8):521-526. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1810246. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Crash Fatality Rates After Recreational Marijuana Legalization in Washington and Colorado.华盛顿州和科罗拉多州娱乐用大麻合法化后的车祸死亡率。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1329-1331. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303848. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
3
Fatal crashes in the 5 years after recreational marijuana legalization in Colorado and Washington.科罗拉多州和华盛顿州娱乐用大麻合法化后的 5 年内发生致命车祸。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105284. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105284. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Collisions and cannabis: Measuring the effect of recreational marijuana legalization on traffic crashes in Washington State.碰撞与大麻:评估华盛顿州娱乐大麻合法化对交通事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):527-535. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2220853. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Association between legalization of recreational cannabis and fatal motor vehicle collisions in the United States: an ecologic study.美国娱乐用大麻合法化与致命机动车碰撞事件之间的关联:一项生态学研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 17;9(1):E233-E241. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200155. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
6
The association between legalization of cannabis use and traffic deaths in Uruguay.乌拉圭大麻使用合法化与交通事故死亡之间的关联。
Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1697-1706. doi: 10.1111/add.14994. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
An examination of the increases in pedestrian motor-vehicle crash fatalities during 2009-2016.分析 2009-2016 年行人与机动车碰撞致死事故的增加情况。
J Safety Res. 2018 Dec;67:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Association of Recreational Cannabis Laws in Colorado and Washington State With Changes in Traffic Fatalities, 2005-2017.科罗拉多州和华盛顿州休闲大麻法律与 2005-2017 年交通死亡人数变化的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1061-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1757.
9
Motor vehicle crash fatalaties and undercompensated care associated with legalization of marijuana.机动车碰撞死亡人数与大麻合法化相关的补偿不足的医疗护理。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):566-571. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001983.
10
Fatal pedestrian crashes on interstates and other freeways in the United States.美国州际和其他高速公路上的致命行人碰撞事故。
J Safety Res. 2020 Sep;74:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug use among individuals injured in non-fatal motor vehicle crashes and related policies in 2023.2023年非致命机动车碰撞事故受伤者的药物使用情况及相关政策
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025 Feb 25:1-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2025.2456952.
2
Road hazard: a systematic review of traffic injuries following recreational cannabis legalization.道路危险:休闲大麻合法化后交通伤害的系统回顾。
CJEM. 2024 Aug;26(8):554-563. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00736-x. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
3
Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map.

本文引用的文献

1
Fatal crashes in the 5 years after recreational marijuana legalization in Colorado and Washington.科罗拉多州和华盛顿州娱乐用大麻合法化后的 5 年内发生致命车祸。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105284. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105284. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
Traffic fatalities within US states that have legalized recreational cannabis sales and their neighbours.美国已将娱乐用大麻合法化的州及其邻州的交通致死案例。
Addiction. 2019 May;114(5):847-856. doi: 10.1111/add.14536. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
The Major Causes of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States.
大麻合法化法律对健康、安全及社会经济的影响:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 30;19(4):e1362. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1362. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Cannabis, Impaired Driving, and Road Safety: An Overview of Key Questions and Issues.大麻、酒驾与道路安全:关键问题概述
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 19;12:641549. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641549. eCollection 2021.
美国儿童和青少年的主要死因
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2468-2475. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1804754.
4
Recent Increases in Injury Mortality Among Children and Adolescents Aged 10-19 Years in the United States: 1999-2016.1999 - 2016年美国10 - 19岁儿童及青少年伤害死亡率近期上升情况
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Jun;67(4):1-16.
5
Motor vehicle crash fatalaties and undercompensated care associated with legalization of marijuana.机动车碰撞死亡人数与大麻合法化相关的补偿不足的医疗护理。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):566-571. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001983.
6
Crash Fatality Rates After Recreational Marijuana Legalization in Washington and Colorado.华盛顿州和科罗拉多州娱乐用大麻合法化后的车祸死亡率。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1329-1331. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303848. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Marijuana and the Risk of Fatal Car Crashes: What Can We Learn from FARS and NRS Data?大麻与致命车祸风险:我们能从美国国家公路交通安全管理局事故分析报告系统(FARS)和国家公路交通安全管理局国家统计报告系统(NRS)数据中学到什么?
J Prim Prev. 2017 Jun;38(3):315-328. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0478-3.
8
US Traffic Fatalities, 1985-2014, and Their Relationship to Medical Marijuana Laws.1985 - 2014年美国交通事故死亡人数及其与医用大麻法律的关系。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Feb;107(2):336-342. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303577. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
9
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
10
Differences in state drug testing and reporting by driver type in U.S. fatal traffic crashes.美国致命交通事故中按驾驶员类型划分的各州药物检测与报告差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Apr 6.