• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

羟羧氧酰胺菌素与妥布霉素-克林霉素对比:继发性腹膜炎的一项随机试验

Moxalactam vs tobramycin-clindamycin. A randomized trial in secondary peritonitis.

作者信息

Stellato T A, Danziger L H, Hau T, Gauderer M W, Ferron J L, Gordon N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, OH 44106.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1988 Jun;123(6):714-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300060009.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300060009
PMID:3285809
Abstract

One hundred five patients with peritonitis were randomized to receive either tobramycin sulfate plus clindamycin phosphate or moxalactam alone before surgical intervention. Fifty-nine patients were evaluable. A mean of 3.1 (moxalactam) and 3.5 (tobramycin-clindamycin) pathogens per patient were identified. Overall success rate was 85% (tobramycin-clindamycin, 24/30; moxalactam, 26/29). When patients with appendicitis were excluded, there was an observed but not statistically significant advantage of moxalactam over tobramycin-clindamycin (85% vs 67%). There were five deaths (tobramycin-clindamycin, four; moxalactam, one). Other complications included hypoprothrombinemia (tobramycin-clindamycin, five; moxalactam, five), renal dysfunction (tobramycin-clindamycin, three; moxalactam, one), and superinfection (tobramycin-clindamycin, nine; moxalactam, six). More wound infections were noted in the group given tobramycin-clindamycin. These data suggest that moxalactam is as safe and efficacious as tobramycin plus clindamycin. The observed benefits of this agent warrant study in a larger sample to verify advantages of moxalactam over combination therapy.

摘要

105例腹膜炎患者在手术干预前被随机分为两组,分别接受硫酸妥布霉素加磷酸克林霉素治疗或单独接受拉氧头孢治疗。59例患者可进行评估。每位患者平均检出3.1种(拉氧头孢组)和3.5种(妥布霉素 - 克林霉素组)病原体。总体成功率为85%(妥布霉素 - 克林霉素组,24/30;拉氧头孢组,26/29)。排除阑尾炎患者后,观察到拉氧头孢相对于妥布霉素 - 克林霉素有优势,但无统计学意义(85%对67%)。有5例死亡(妥布霉素 - 克林霉素组4例;拉氧头孢组1例)。其他并发症包括低凝血酶原血症(妥布霉素 - 克林霉素组5例;拉氧头孢组5例)、肾功能不全(妥布霉素 - 克林霉素组3例;拉氧头孢组1例)和二重感染(妥布霉素 - 克林霉素组9例;拉氧头孢组6例)。接受妥布霉素 - 克林霉素治疗的组中伤口感染更多。这些数据表明拉氧头孢与妥布霉素加克林霉素一样安全有效。该药物观察到的益处值得在更大样本中进行研究,以验证拉氧头孢相对于联合治疗的优势。

相似文献

1
Moxalactam vs tobramycin-clindamycin. A randomized trial in secondary peritonitis.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与妥布霉素-克林霉素对比:继发性腹膜炎的一项随机试验
Arch Surg. 1988 Jun;123(6):714-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300060009.
2
Moxalactam versus clindamycin plus tobramycin in the treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infections.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素加妥布霉素治疗妇产科感染的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Aug 1;152(7 Pt 1):808-17. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80068-5.
3
Moxalactam versus clindamycin plus tobramycin for the treatment of puerperal infections.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素加妥布霉素治疗产褥感染的比较
South Med J. 1987 Sep;80(9):1116-9. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198708090-00011.
4
A randomized controlled trial of moxalactam versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections.一项比较羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素/妥布霉素治疗需氧菌与厌氧菌混合感染的随机对照试验。
Am Surg. 1986 Sep;52(9):467-71.
5
Single-antibiotic use for penetrating abdominal trauma.用于穿透性腹部创伤的单一抗生素使用。
Arch Surg. 1986 Feb;121(2):153-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400020039003.
6
Randomized prospective study comparing moxalactam and cefoxitin with or without tobramycin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.比较羟羧氧酰胺菌素和头孢西丁联合或不联合妥布霉素治疗严重外科感染的随机前瞻性研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):244-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.2.244.
7
A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.一项关于头孢氧哌唑与庆大霉素及克林霉素治疗腹部穿透伤的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jul;163(1):1-4.
8
Clinical risk factors for prolonged PT/PTT in abdominal sepsis patients treated with moxalactam or tobramycin plus clindamycin.使用羟羧氧酰胺菌素或妥布霉素加克林霉素治疗的腹部脓毒症患者凝血酶原时间/部分凝血活酶时间延长的临床风险因素。
Ann Surg. 1985 Jan;201(1):96-102.
9
A randomized clinical trial of moxalactam alone versus tobramycin plus clindamycin in abdominal sepsis.莫西拉坦单药与妥布霉素加克林霉素治疗腹部脓毒症的随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 1983 Jul;198(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198307000-00007.
10
Results of a randomized, multicenter trial of meropenem versus clindamycin/tobramycin for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南与克林霉素/妥布霉素治疗腹腔内感染的随机多中心试验结果
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Feb;24 Suppl 2:S197-206. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_2.s197.

引用本文的文献

1
Current indications for the use of clindamycin: A critical review.克林霉素使用的当前适应症:一项批判性综述。
Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;9(1):22-8. doi: 10.1155/1998/538090.
2
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.