• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿科与产科之间的联合围产生存可能性咨询非常罕见。

Joint periviability counseling between neonatology and obstetrics is a rare occurrence.

机构信息

Division of Newborn Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Division of Newborn Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1789-1796. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00796-8. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1038/s41372-020-00796-8
PMID:32859941
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the frequency with which neonatal and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) providers perform joint periviability counseling (JPC), compare content of counseling, and identify perceived barriers to JPC.

STUDY DESIGN

An anonymous REDCap survey was e-mailed to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine and to members of the Society for MFM.

RESULTS

There were 424 neonatal and 115 MFM participants. Fifty-two percent of neonatal and 35% of MFM respondents reported rarely/never performing JPC (p < 0.001), while 80% and 82%, respectively felt it would improve counseling. Content of counseling was similar, except for length of stay with 93% of neonatal vs. 85% of MFM respondents addressing this (p = 0.03). The majority (>60%) of respondents in both groups reported that clinical duties posed a significant/great barrier to JPC.

CONCLUSION

JPC is recommended but infrequently performed, with both specialties interested in further collaboration to strengthen the counseling provided.

摘要

目的

调查新生儿和母胎医学(MFM)提供者进行联合围产儿生存能力咨询(JPC)的频率,比较咨询内容,并确定 JPC 的障碍感知。

研究设计

对儿科学会新生儿围产期医学分会和母胎医学协会的成员进行了匿名的 REDCap 调查。

结果

共有 424 名新生儿和 115 名 MFM 参与者。52%的新生儿和 35%的 MFM 受访者报告很少/从未进行过 JPC(p<0.001),而 80%和 82%的受访者分别认为这将改善咨询。咨询内容相似,除了住院时间,93%的新生儿受访者和 85%的 MFM 受访者都提到了这一点(p=0.03)。大多数(>60%)的受访者表示,临床职责对 JPC 构成了重大/巨大障碍。

结论

JPC 是被推荐的,但很少执行,两个专业都有兴趣进一步合作,以加强提供的咨询。

相似文献

1
Joint periviability counseling between neonatology and obstetrics is a rare occurrence.新生儿科与产科之间的联合围产生存可能性咨询非常罕见。
J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1789-1796. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00796-8. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Collaboration between Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Neonatology When Counseling at Extreme Prematurity.孕产医学与新生儿学在极早产儿咨询时的协作。
Neoreviews. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):e137-e143. doi: 10.1542/neo.24-3-e137.
3
What Information Do Clinicians Deem Important for Counseling Parents Facing Extremely Early Deliveries?: Results from an Online Survey.临床医生认为对于为面临极早产的父母提供咨询而言,哪些信息至关重要?一项在线调查的结果
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Apr;40(6):657-665. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730430. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
4
Differing attitudes toward fetal care by pediatric and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.儿科和母胎医学专家对胎儿护理的不同态度。
Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1534-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1352. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
5
Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010-2013.围产期区域化:2010 - 2013年美国围产期重症监护的地理空间视角
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):185.e1-185.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
6
Practices and education surrounding anticipated periviable deliveries among neonatal-perinatal medicine and maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs.新生儿围产医学和母胎医学专科培训项目中关于预期的近可存活儿分娩的实践与教育。
J Perinatol. 2016 Sep;36(9):699-703. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.68. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Preferences and comfort of maternal fetal medicine fellows in the United States with operative vaginal deliveries.美国母胎医学研究员对阴道分娩手术的偏好和舒适度。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Sep;35(17):3238-3243. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1817894. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.近可存活儿分娩:尤妮斯·肯尼迪·施莱佛国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所、母胎医学协会、美国儿科学会及美国妇产科医师学会联合研讨会执行摘要
J Perinatol. 2014 May;34(5):333-42. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.70. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
9
Role of the Hospitalist and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician in Obstetrical Inpatient Care.住院医师和母胎医学医师在产科住院患者护理中的作用。
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jan;33(2):123-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559808. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
10
Evaluation and development of potentially better practices for perinatal and neonatal communication and collaboration.围产期及新生儿沟通与协作潜在更佳实践的评估与发展
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118 Suppl 2:S147-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0913L.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal fetal medicine, obstetric, and neonatology perspectives on joint prenatal counseling at periviable gestational ages.母胎医学、产科学及新生儿学对孕极早期联合产前咨询的观点。
J Perinatol. 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02260-x.
2
Decision making at extreme prematurity: Innovation in clinician education.极早产儿决策制定:临床医生教育的创新。
Semin Perinatol. 2022 Apr;46(3):151529. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151529. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Birth Planning in Uncertain or Life-Limiting Fetal Diagnoses: Perspectives of Physicians and Parents.在不确定或生命有限的胎儿诊断中进行生育计划:医生和父母的观点。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;22(11):1337-1345. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0596. Epub 2019 May 7.
2
Neonatologists' preferences regarding guidelines for periviable deliveries: do we really know what we want?围产儿医学专家对极早产儿分娩指南的偏好:我们真的知道自己想要什么吗?
J Perinatol. 2019 Mar;39(3):445-452. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0313-1. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
3
Various experiences and preferences of Dutch parents in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity.
荷兰父母在极早产儿产前咨询中的各种经验和偏好。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2179-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals.在可存活极限的情况下首选产前咨询:荷兰围产期专业人员的一项调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 3;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1644-6.
5
Extremely premature birth, informed written consent, and the Greek ideal of sophrosyne.极早产、知情书面同意以及希腊的节制理想。
J Perinatol. 2018 Apr;38(4):306-310. doi: 10.1038/s41372-017-0024-4. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
6
Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study.生存极限下产前咨询中专业人员的偏好:一项荷兰全国性定性研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;176(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2952-6. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Health-care provider communication with expectant parents during a prenatal diagnosis: an integrative review.产前诊断期间医疗保健提供者与准父母的沟通:一项综合综述。
J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;37(1):2-12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.123. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
8
Antenatal Counseling Regarding Resuscitation and Intensive Care Before 25 Weeks of Gestation.妊娠25周前关于复苏和重症监护的产前咨询。
Pediatrics. 2015 Sep;136(3):588-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2336.
9
Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies delivered at 23 weeks' gestation.孕23周分娩的孕产妇及围产儿结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Mar;37(3):214-224. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30307-8.
10
Proactive care at the edge of viability: making the gray zone less gray?在可存活边缘的积极护理:能否让灰色地带不再那么灰暗?
Pediatrics. 2015 May;135(5):e1288-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0536.