• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚马查科斯县既往治疗和新发病例一线结核病治疗结局比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of first-line tuberculosis treatment outcomes between previously treated and new patients: a retrospective study in Machakos subcounty, Kenya.

机构信息

Department of Health and Emergency Services, Machakos County, Kenya.

Directorate of Research and Innovation, Mount Kenya University, Box 342-01000, Thika, Kenya.

出版信息

Int Health. 2021 Apr 27;13(3):272-280. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa051.

DOI:10.1093/inthealth/ihaa051
PMID:32860045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8079320/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2016, patients with rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) have been treated with the 6-month first-line regimen, regardless of treatment history. We assessed treatment outcomes of previously treated and new patients in Machakos subcounty, Kenya.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients started on first-line treatment between 2016 and 2017. Firth's logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of previous treatment on having a programmatic adverse outcome (either lost to follow-up, death, failure) and treatment failure vs treatment success (either cure or completion).

RESULTS

Of 1024 new and 79 previously treated patients, 88.1% and 74.7% were treated successfully, 6.5% and 7.6% died, 4.2% and 10.1% were lost to follow-up and 1.2% and 7.6% had treatment failure, respectively. Previous treatment predicted having a programmatic adverse outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.4 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.4 to 4.2]) and treatment failure (aOR 7.3 [95% CI 2.6 to 20.4]) but not mortality. Similar correlations were found in 334 new and previously treated patients with confirmed baseline rifampicin susceptibility.

CONCLUSION

Previously treated patients were more at risk of experiencing a poor treatment outcome, mainly lost to follow-up and treatment failure. Adherence support may reduce lost to follow-up. Rifampicin drug susceptibility testing coverage should increase. More robust retreatment regimens may reduce treatment failure.

摘要

背景

自 2016 年以来,无论治疗史如何,利福平敏感结核病(TB)患者均采用 6 个月的一线方案进行治疗。我们评估了肯尼亚 Machakos 次县既往治疗和新患者的治疗结局。

方法

我们对 2016 年至 2017 年期间开始接受一线治疗的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。采用菲尔兹逻辑回归估计既往治疗对发生方案性不良结局(失访、死亡、失败)和治疗失败与治疗成功(治愈或完成)的影响。

结果

在 1024 例新患者和 79 例既往治疗患者中,分别有 88.1%和 74.7%的患者治疗成功,6.5%和 7.6%的患者死亡,4.2%和 10.1%的患者失访,1.2%和 7.6%的患者治疗失败。既往治疗预测会发生方案性不良结局(校正比值比[aOR]2.4[95%置信区间{CI}1.4 至 4.2])和治疗失败(aOR 7.3[95%CI 2.6 至 20.4]),但与死亡率无关。在 334 例基线利福平敏感性得到证实的新患者和既往治疗患者中也发现了类似的相关性。

结论

既往治疗的患者更有可能出现不良治疗结局,主要是失访和治疗失败。加强治疗依从性支持可能会减少失访。利福平药敏检测覆盖率应提高。更有效的复治方案可能会降低治疗失败的风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison of first-line tuberculosis treatment outcomes between previously treated and new patients: a retrospective study in Machakos subcounty, Kenya.肯尼亚马查科斯县既往治疗和新发病例一线结核病治疗结局比较:一项回顾性研究。
Int Health. 2021 Apr 27;13(3):272-280. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa051.
2
Baseline Predictors of Treatment Outcomes in Children With Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.儿童耐多药结核病治疗结局的基线预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 15;63(8):1063-71. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw489. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Treatment outcomes 24 months after initiating short, all-oral bedaquiline-containing or injectable-containing rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study.南非采用短程、全口服含贝达喹啉或注射用利福平耐药结核病治疗方案 24 个月后的治疗结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;22(7):1042-1051. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00811-2. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Social and health factors associated with adverse treatment outcomes among people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Sierra Leone: a national, retrospective cohort study.与塞拉利昂耐多药结核病患者不良治疗结局相关的社会和健康因素:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Apr;10(4):e543-e554. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00004-3.
5
Standard short-course chemotherapy for drug-resistant tuberculosis: treatment outcomes in 6 countries.耐多药结核病的标准短程化疗:6个国家的治疗结果
JAMA. 2000 May 17;283(19):2537-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.19.2537.
6
Comparison of different treatments for isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.不同抗结核药物治疗方案治疗耐多药结核病的比较:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):265-275. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30078-X.
7
Better programmatic outcome with the shorter regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Guinea: A retrospective cohort study.在几内亚,采用较短方案治疗耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)可获得更好的临床结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237355. eCollection 2020.
8
Isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis: Time to take it seriously.异烟肼单耐药结核病:是时候认真对待了。
Indian J Tuberc. 2019 Apr;66(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
9
[Characteristics and treatment outcomes of INH-resistant or RFP-resistant tuberculosis].[耐异烟肼或耐利福平结核病的特征及治疗结果]
Kekkaku. 2003 Oct;78(10):611-7.
10
Bedaquiline safety, efficacy, utilization and emergence of resistance following treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in South Africa: a retrospective cohort analysis.贝达喹啉治疗南非耐多药结核病患者的安全性、疗效、利用情况和耐药性的出现:一项回顾性队列分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07861-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to a tuberculosis treatment cure and its predictors among tuberculosis patients at public health facilities in Arba minch town, South Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study.埃塞俄比亚南部阿尔巴明奇镇公共卫生机构中结核病患者的结核病治疗治愈时间及其预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11224-7.
2
Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes and Associated Factors in Benadir Somalia. A Multicenter Cohort Study.索马里贝纳迪尔地区的结核病治疗结果及相关因素。一项多中心队列研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jun 11;17:2711-2718. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S463237. eCollection 2024.
3
Benzothiadiazinone-1,1-Dioxide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors Suppress the Growth of Drug-Resistant Strains.苯并噻二嗪酮-1,1-二氧化物碳酸酐酶抑制剂可抑制耐药菌株的生长。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 23;25(5):2584. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052584.
4
FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO PULMONARY TB TREATMENT LOST TO FOLLOW-UP IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: AN OVERVIEW.发展中国家肺结核治疗失访的相关因素概述
Afr J Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 22;17(1):60-73. doi: 10.21010/Ajidv17i1.6. eCollection 2023.
5
Risk factors associated with tuberculosis recurrence in South Korea determined using a nationwide cohort study.利用全国性队列研究确定韩国结核病复发的相关风险因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0268290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268290. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on the pathway of care and treatment outcome among patients with tuberculosis in a rural part of northern India: a community-based study.印度北部农村地区2019冠状病毒病封锁对结核病患者护理途径和治疗结果的影响:一项基于社区的研究
J Rural Med. 2022 Apr;17(2):59-66. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2021-039. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The perceived impact of isoniazid resistance on outcome of first-line rifampicin-throughout regimens is largely due to missed rifampicin resistance.异烟肼耐药对一线利福平全疗程方案结局的影响主要归因于漏检的利福平耐药。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233500. eCollection 2020.
2
Tuberculosis treatment outcomes among prisoners and general population in Zomba, Malawi.马拉维宗巴的囚犯和一般人群中的结核病治疗结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 15;20(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08841-z.
3
High-Dose First-Line Treatment Regimen for Recurrent Rifampicin-Susceptible Tuberculosis.复发性利福平敏感结核病的大剂量一线治疗方案
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 15;201(12):1578-1579. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202001-0201LE.
4
Early Bactericidal Activity of Different Isoniazid Doses for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (INHindsight): A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.不同异烟肼剂量对耐多药结核病的早期杀菌活性(事后回顾):一项随机、开放标签的临床试验
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1416-1424. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201910-1960OC.
5
How Well Do Routine Molecular Diagnostics Detect Rifampin Heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis?常规分子诊断检测结核分枝杆菌利福平异质性耐药的效果如何?
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00717-19. Print 2019 Nov.
6
Smartphone-enabled video-observed versus directly observed treatment for tuberculosis: a multicentre, analyst-blinded, randomised, controlled superiority trial.智能手机辅助视频观察与直接观察治疗结核病的效果比较:一项多中心、分析者设盲、随机、对照优效试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 23;393(10177):1216-1224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32993-3. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Poor treatment outcomes and its determinants among tuberculosis patients in selected health facilities in East Wollega, Western Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚西部东沃洛格地区选定的卫生机构中,结核病患者的治疗效果不佳及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206227. eCollection 2018.
8
Drug-susceptible tuberculosis treatment success and associated factors in Ethiopia from 2005 to 2017: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2005年至2017年埃塞俄比亚药物敏感性结核病治疗成功率及相关因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 25;8(9):e022111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022111.
9
Analysis of tuberculosis treatment outcomes among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Bahawalpur, Pakistan.巴基斯坦巴哈瓦尔布尔肺结核患者的结核病治疗结果分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jun 8;11(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3473-8.
10
The relationship between social support, treatment interruption and treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: a mixed-methods study.中国耐多药结核病患者的社会支持、治疗中断与治疗结局之间的关系:一项混合方法研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Jun;23(6):668-677. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13066. Epub 2018 May 16.