Division of Vascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Aug;44(4):1797-1804. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01379-z. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
The objective of this study is to provide an update on endovascular treatments for iatrogenic internal carotid artery (ICA) injuries following endonasal surgery. A systematic review of the literature was performed by using Medline, Cochrane library, and Scopus from 1999 to 2019. We used a combination of the MeSH terms "internal carotid artery," "iatrogenic disease," and "endovascular procedure." Twenty-six articles including 46 patients were identified for in this systematic review. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (CI: ± 4.2). The most common site of ICA injury was in cavernous segment (18 patients; 39%). The most common type of iatrogenic ICA injury was a traumatic pseudoaneurysm documented in 28 patients (60%). Endoluminal reconstruction was performed using covered stents in 28 patients, the Pipeline embolization device (PED) in 13 patients, the Surpass flow diverter device in three, the SILK flow diverter in one, and one case was treated using a combined approach of a covered stent and a PED. Flow diversion and covered stents resulted in a good clinical outcome in 94% and 89% of patients, respectively. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 1.0). Even though this systematic review was limited due to articles of small sample sizes and considerable heterogeneity, the results indicate that flow diverting devices and covered stents are good therapeutic options for endoluminal reconstruction of iatrogenic ICA injuries following endonasal surgery.
本研究旨在提供经鼻内镜手术后医源性颈内动脉(ICA)损伤的血管内治疗最新进展。通过使用 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆和 Scopus 从 1999 年到 2019 年进行了文献系统性回顾。我们使用了“颈内动脉”、“医源性疾病”和“血管内操作”的 MeSH 术语组合。本系统性回顾共确定了 26 篇文章,包括 46 例患者。患者的平均年龄为 49 岁(CI:±4.2)。ICA 损伤最常见的部位是海绵窦段(18 例;39%)。最常见的医源性 ICA 损伤类型是 28 例创伤性假性动脉瘤(60%)。28 例患者采用覆膜支架进行腔内重建,13 例患者采用 Pipeline 栓塞装置(PED),3 例患者采用 Surpass 血流分流器,1 例患者采用 SILK 血流分流器,1 例患者采用覆膜支架和 PED 联合治疗。血流分流和覆膜支架分别使 94%和 89%的患者获得了良好的临床效果。这一差异没有统计学意义(p=1.0)。尽管由于样本量小和存在很大异质性,本系统性回顾受到限制,但结果表明,血流转向装置和覆膜支架是经鼻内镜手术后医源性 ICA 损伤腔内重建的良好治疗选择。