The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics (National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2822-2830. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16769. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To obtain national and regional estimates of prevalence of frailty with or without cognitive impairment, and cognitive impairment with or without frailty among older adults in the United States, and to identify profiles of characteristics that distinguish their joint versus separate occurrence.
Cross-sectional.
Community or non-nursing home residential care settings.
A U.S. nationally representative sample of 7,497 older adults aged 65 and older from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.
Frailty was measured by the physical frailty phenotype. Cognitive impairment was assessed by cognitive performance testing of executive function and memory or by proxy reports. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify profiles of demographic, socioeconomic, health, behavioral, and psychosocial characteristics that distinguish four subgroups: not-frail and cognitively intact ("neither"), not-frail and cognitively impaired ("Cog. only"), frail and cognitively intact ("frailty only"), and frail and cognitively impaired ("both").
The prevalence of "Cog. only," "frailty only," and "both" was 25.5%, 5.6%, and 8.7%, respectively. Individuals with"frailty only" had the highest prevalence of obesity, current smoking, comorbidity, lung disease, and history of surgery. The "both" group had the highest prevalence of dementia, depression, cardiovascular diseases, and disability. No significant differences were found between the "Cog. only" group and the "neither" group with respect to history of surgery and comorbidity burden. The prevalence of dementia in the "Cog. only" was less than half of that in the "both" group.
The finding of sizable subgroups having physical frailty but not cognitive impairment, and vice versa, suggests that the two cannot be considered necessarily as antecedent or sequela of one another. The study provided empirical data supporting the prioritization of comorbidity, obesity, surgery history, and smoking status in clinical screening of frailty and cognitive impairment before formal diagnostic assessments.
背景/目的:本研究旨在获取美国老年人中伴有或不伴有认知障碍的衰弱以及伴有或不伴有衰弱的认知障碍的全国和地区患病率数据,并确定区分两者共同和单独发生的特征分布情况。
横断面研究。
社区或非养老院居住环境。
来自国家健康老龄化趋势研究的美国全国代表性样本,共纳入 7497 名年龄在 65 岁及以上的老年人。
衰弱通过身体衰弱表型进行测量。认知障碍通过执行功能和记忆认知测试或代理报告进行评估。采用多项逻辑回归确定区分四个亚组的人口统计学、社会经济学、健康、行为和心理社会特征分布情况:无衰弱且认知正常(“两者均无”)、无衰弱且认知受损(“仅认知障碍”)、衰弱且认知正常(“仅衰弱”)和衰弱且认知受损(“两者均有”)。
“仅认知障碍”、“仅衰弱”和“两者均有”的患病率分别为 25.5%、5.6%和 8.7%。“仅衰弱”患者的肥胖、当前吸烟、合并症、肺部疾病和手术史的患病率最高。“两者均有”患者的痴呆、抑郁、心血管疾病和残疾的患病率最高。与“两者均无”组相比,“仅认知障碍”组在手术史和合并症负担方面没有显著差异。“仅认知障碍”组的痴呆患病率不到“两者均有”组的一半。
存在身体衰弱但无认知障碍以及相反情况的大量亚组的发现表明,两者不能被视为彼此的必然前因或后果。该研究提供了支持在进行正式诊断评估之前,通过对合并症、肥胖、手术史和吸烟状况进行临床筛查来优先考虑衰弱和认知障碍的实证数据。