Suppr超能文献

60 岁以上人群的身体虚弱和认知状况:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Physical frailty and cognitive status over-60 age populations: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Research Unit of Physical Activity and Sport at Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education (CIDAF, UID/PDT/04213/2016) - University of Coimbra, Portugal; Medical Psychology Unit, School of Medicine, Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.

Research Unit of Physical Activity and Sport at Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education (CIDAF, UID/PDT/04213/2016) - University of Coimbra, Portugal; Medical Psychology Unit, School of Medicine, Clinical Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyse the magnitude of the effect-size of the cognitive status of populations over 60 years of age, when comparing nonfrail versus pre-frail and nonfrail versus frail subgroups. A systematic review of prospective studies published from 2000 to 2017 was completed in Medline, B-on, Ebsco, Ebsco Health, Scielo, ERIC, LILACS and Sport discus databases and observational, cohort and cross-sectional studies were selected. The Mini-Mental State Examination to screening cognitive status and the Fried phenotype for assess physical frailty state was used as clinical outcomes. After applying additional search criteria, 14 manuscripts (26,798 old participants) were selected from an initial universe of 1681 identified. When comparing the scores of cognitive status of the participants who were non-frail (n = 12,729, 47.4%) versus pre-frail (n = 11,559, 43.2%) and non-frail versus frail (n = 2452, 9.4%) subgroups, significant statistical differences were found for both comparisons (M ± SD = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.50-0.62, p < 0.001 and M ± SD = 3.43, 95%CI: 2.26-4.60, p < 0.001, respectively). It is clear that poor cognitive function is strongly closed associated with pre-frailty and frailty subgroups in older populations around the world.

摘要

本荟萃分析旨在分析比较无脆弱与衰弱前期和无脆弱与衰弱亚组时,60 岁以上人群认知状态的效应大小幅度。对 2000 年至 2017 年发表的前瞻性研究进行了系统综述,检索了 Medline、B-on、Ebsco、Ebsco Health、Scielo、ERIC、LILACS 和 Sport discus 数据库,选择了观察性、队列和横断面研究。采用简易精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination)筛查认知状态,采用 Fried 表型(Fried phenotype)评估躯体脆弱状态作为临床结局。在应用其他搜索标准后,从最初的 1681 篇文献中选择了 14 篇文献(26798 名老年参与者)。当比较无脆弱(n=12729,47.4%)与衰弱前期(n=11559,43.2%)以及无脆弱与衰弱(n=2452,9.4%)亚组参与者的认知状态评分时,这两种比较均发现了显著的统计学差异(M±SD=0.60,95%CI:0.50-0.62,p<0.001 和 M±SD=3.43,95%CI:2.26-4.60,p<0.001)。显然,在全球老年人群中,认知功能差与衰弱前期和衰弱亚组密切相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验