• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的社会民主政府与卫生政策:一项定量分析。

Social-democratic government and health policy in Europe: a quantitative analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(3):389-413. doi: 10.2190/HS.43.3.b.

DOI:10.2190/HS.43.3.b
PMID:24066412
Abstract

Although health policy ultimately depends on political decision making, empirical evidence of the impact of politics on implementation of health policies and their population health outcomes is scarce. In this study, we assess the effects of social-democratic government participation on indicators of preventive health policy (tobacco, alcohol, food, mother and child health, infectious diseases, hypertension, cancer screening, road traffic safety, air pollution) in Europe. Cumulative years of social-democratic government differed widely between European countries, as did indicators of current health policy performance, but the latter are not associated with recent social-democratic government. However, there is a positive association with social-democratic government cumulated over five decades. Positive effects of social-democratic government are mainly seen on indicators of tobacco and alcohol control. We conclude that long-term social-democratic government participation may have had a positive impact on some areas of preventive health policy, perhaps through the creation of strong public health institutions or a strong public health workforce.

摘要

尽管卫生政策最终取决于政治决策,但政治对卫生政策实施及其对人口健康结果的影响的经验证据却很少。在这项研究中,我们评估了社会民主主义政府参与对欧洲预防卫生政策指标(烟草、酒精、食品、母婴健康、传染病、高血压、癌症筛查、道路交通安全、空气污染)的影响。欧洲各国之间社会民主主义政府的累计参与年限差异很大,当前卫生政策绩效指标也存在差异,但后者与近期社会民主主义政府无关。然而,与过去五十年累计的社会民主主义政府却呈正相关。社会民主主义政府的积极作用主要体现在烟草和酒精控制指标上。我们的结论是,长期参与社会民主主义政府可能对预防卫生政策的某些领域产生了积极影响,这也许是通过创建强大的公共卫生机构或强大的公共卫生劳动力实现的。

相似文献

1
Social-democratic government and health policy in Europe: a quantitative analysis.欧洲的社会民主政府与卫生政策:一项定量分析。
Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(3):389-413. doi: 10.2190/HS.43.3.b.
2
A comparative analysis of health policy performance in 43 European countries.43 个欧洲国家卫生政策绩效的比较分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Apr;23(2):195-201. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks192. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
Government, politics and health policy: A quantitative analysis of 30 European countries.政府、政治与卫生政策:对30个欧洲国家的定量分析
Health Policy. 2015 Oct;119(10):1298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
4
Democratic constraints on demographic policy.民主对人口政策的限制。
Comp Soc Res. 1984;7:387-96.
5
Policies for disease prevention in Germany in the European context: a comparative analysis.欧洲背景下德国的疾病预防政策:一项比较分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Sep;26(3):230-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh149.
6
The importance of the political and the social in explaining mortality differentials among the countries of the OECD, 1950-1998.1950年至1998年期间,政治和社会因素在解释经合组织国家间死亡率差异方面的重要性。
Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(3):419-94. doi: 10.2190/R7GE-8DWK-YY6C-183U.
7
The political context of social inequalities and health.社会不平等与健康的政治背景。
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(1):1-21. doi: 10.2190/1GY8-V5QN-A1TA-A9KJ.
8
Norwegian public health policy: revitalization of the social democratic welfare state?挪威公共卫生政策:社会民主福利国家的复兴?
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(2):287-300. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.2.d.
9
Comparative social policy and political conflict in advanced welfare states: Denmark and Sweden.发达福利国家中的比较社会政策与政治冲突:丹麦与瑞典
Int J Health Serv. 1979;9(2):269-93. doi: 10.2190/7RRY-DM4L-EPR8-2RGB.
10
Political and welfare state determinants of infant and child health indicators: an analysis of wealthy countries.婴儿和儿童健康指标的政治与福利国家决定因素:对富裕国家的分析
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(3):829-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.030. Epub 2006 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[The association between school tobacco policies and the perceived smoking prevalence of adolescents].[学校烟草政策与青少年感知吸烟率之间的关联]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Jan;64(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03261-1. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America.为什么一些国家在预期寿命方面相对于收入表现得更好或更差?对巴西、埃塞俄比亚和美利坚合众国的分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01315-z.
3
Issue Competition and the Social Construction of Target Populations: Alternative Suggestions for the Study of the Influence of Populist Radical Right Parties on Health Policy and Health Outcomes Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".
问题竞争与目标人群的社会建构:对民粹主义激进右翼政党对卫生政策和健康结果影响的研究的另一种建议 评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对福利政策的影响及其对欧洲人口健康的影响的范围综述”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):591-593. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.157.
4
The effects of public health policies on population health and health inequalities in European welfare states: protocol for an umbrella review.欧洲福利国家公共卫生政策对人群健康及健康不平等的影响:一项伞状综述方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 8;5:57. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0235-3.