Colegiado de Educação Física, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina-PE, Brazil.
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Clinical Epidemiology, PAIFIT Research Group, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina-PR, Brazil.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Oct;49:102195. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102195. Epub 2020 May 27.
Aquatic exercise (AQE) programme is commonly used as an alternative to the chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatment. The addition of aquatic aerobic exercises to AQE may be beneficial to patients with CLBP.
Randomised controlled trial.
To assess the effectiveness of AQE with the addition of aerobic exercise - deep-water running (DWR) - compared to exclusive AQE in improving disability, lumbar pain intensity, and functional capacity in patients with CLBP.
Fifty-four adult patients with CLBP were randomised either to the experimental group (AQE + DWR) or the control group (AQE). An assessor who was blinded to the group allocation performed both pre- and post-interventions assessments. Both treatments lasted 9 weeks, with a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was disability, as evaluated using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were pain and functional capacity; pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional capacity (travelled distance) was measured using the 6-min walk test (6WT).
A significant difference in pain was observed between groups after intervention in favour of DWR (mean difference -1.3 cm [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.17 to -0.45], d‾ = 0.80 [95% CI 0.22 to 1.33]).
Treatment with DWR was effective in the short term for achieving the desired outcome of pain reduction when compared with AQE only but not for disability and functional capacity.
水上运动(AQE)方案通常被用作慢性下腰痛(CLBP)治疗的替代方法。在 AQE 中加入有氧水上运动(深水区跑步,DWR)可能对 CLBP 患者有益。
随机对照试验。
评估与单独 AQE 相比,AQE 加有氧运动 - 深水区跑步(DWR)对改善 CLBP 患者的残疾、腰痛强度和功能能力的有效性。
54 名成年 CLBP 患者被随机分为实验组(AQE+DWR)或对照组(AQE)。一位对分组分配不知情的评估员在干预前后进行了评估。两种治疗均持续 9 周,随访 3 个月。主要结局是使用 Roland Morris 残疾问卷评估的残疾。次要结局是疼痛和功能能力;疼痛使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估,功能能力(行走距离)使用 6 分钟步行测试(6WT)测量。
干预后,两组之间疼痛存在显著差异,DWR 组疼痛减轻(平均差异 -1.3cm [95%置信区间(CI)-2.17 至 -0.45],d‾=0.80 [95%CI 0.22 至 1.33])。
与单独 AQE 相比,DWR 治疗在短期内对减轻疼痛有效果,但对残疾和功能能力没有效果。