Suppr超能文献

烧伤患者的插管:曼彻斯特地区烧伤中心 5 年经验回顾。

Intubation in burns patients: a 5-year review of the Manchester regional burns centre experience.

机构信息

Manchester Burns Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, England, UK.

Manchester Burns Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, England, UK.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 May;47(3):576-586. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Abstract

Despite criteria to guide intubation from the American Burn Association (ABA), concerns remain regarding over-intubation of burns patients. The purpose of this study was to review appropriateness of intubation at a UK regional burns centre over a 5-year period. A 5-year retrospective review of adult patients admitted to the Manchester Burns Centre who underwent intubation at or prior to admission was performed. Intubations for non-burn indications or burns >40%TBSA were excluded. Patient demographic and burn characteristics data were extracted from medical records. Indications for intubation were compared to ABA and Denver criteria. 47 patients were identified, of which 40 met inclusion criteria for analysis. 72.5% and 95% of these patients met ABA or Denver criteria respectively. 30.8% of patients were extubated within 48 h. 50% patients extubated within 48 h had ≤1 indication for intubation or negative laryngoscopy. Complications related to intubation and ventilation were noted in 37.5% of patients, with ventilation associated pneumonia (VAP) being the most common occurring in 27.5%. 95% of patients fulfilled recognised criteria for intubation. However, 30% were extubated within 48 h, suggesting potentially avoidable intubation. This study suggests current intubation criteria may over-estimate risk of airway compromise and supports results from non-UK studies that a proportion of patients may be suitable for close observation rather than early intubation.

摘要

尽管美国烧伤协会 (ABA) 有指导插管的标准,但仍存在对烧伤患者过度插管的担忧。本研究的目的是回顾英国一家地区烧伤中心在 5 年内插管的适宜性。对在曼彻斯特烧伤中心住院并在入院前或入院时进行插管的成年患者进行了为期 5 年的回顾性研究。排除了因非烧伤原因或烧伤面积 >40%TBSA 而进行的插管。从病历中提取患者的人口统计学和烧伤特征数据。将插管指征与 ABA 和丹佛标准进行比较。共确定了 47 名患者,其中 40 名符合分析纳入标准。分别有 72.5%和 95%的患者符合 ABA 或丹佛标准。30.8%的患者在 48 小时内拔管。在 48 小时内拔管的 50%患者中,只有 ≤1 个插管指征或喉镜检查阴性。37.5%的患者出现与插管和通气相关的并发症,其中通气相关性肺炎 (VAP) 最常见,占 27.5%。95%的患者符合公认的插管标准。然而,30%的患者在 48 小时内拔管,表明可能可以避免插管。本研究表明,目前的插管标准可能高估了气道损伤的风险,并支持了来自非英国的研究结果,即一部分患者可能适合密切观察而不是早期插管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验