• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定热烧伤患者的插管标准。

Defining the criteria for intubation of the patient with thermal burns.

作者信息

Badulak Jenelle H, Schurr Michael, Sauaia Angela, Ivashchenko Anna, Peltz Erik

机构信息

University of Washington, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.

Mountain Area Health Education Center, Division of General Surgery, 121 Hendersonville Road, Asheville, NC 28803, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2018 May;44(3):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.016
PMID:29548862
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies demonstrate that burn patients are undergoing unnecessary intubations. We sought to determine the clinical criteria that predict intubations with benefit.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of intubated adults admitted to our center with thermal burns 2008-2013. Criteria for intubation were defined as traditional criteria (suspected smoke inhalation, oropharynx soot, hoarseness, dysphagia, singed facial hair, oral edema, oral burn, non-full thickness facial burns), or ABA criteria as defined by the 2011 ABA guidelines (full thickness facial burns, stridor, respiratory distress, swelling on laryngoscopy, upper airway trauma, altered mentation, hypoxia/hypercarbia, hemodynamic instability). Patients with <26days free from mechanical ventilation (ventilator-free days (VFD)) out of 28, were deemed indicated long-term intubations. Those with ≥26 VFD were deemed unnecessary short-term intubations.

RESULTS

Of 218 patients, 151 had long-term and 67 had short-term intubations. Long-term intubation was strongly associated with ABA criteria (77.5%) compared to traditional criteria (22.5%) (p<0.001). Sensitivity of ABA criteria for long-term intubation was 77% and specificity 46%. Traditional criteria associated with long-term intubation included suspected smoke inhalation (OR 2.45 [95% CI, 1.18-5.11]), and singed facial hair (OR 2.53 [95% CI, 1.25-5.09]). The addition of these to ABA criteria created the Denver criteria, which exhibited an increased sensitivity for long-term intubations (95%), but decreased specificity (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intubation should be considered for patients displaying the Denver criteria, which includes full thickness facial burns, stridor, respiratory distress, swelling on laryngoscopy, upper airway trauma, altered mentation, hypoxia/hypercarbia, hemodynamic instability, suspected smoke inhalation, and singed facial hair. Patients lacking these criteria should not be intubated.

摘要

目的

近期研究表明,烧伤患者正在接受不必要的插管。我们试图确定能预测插管有益的临床标准。

方法

这是一项对2008 - 2013年因热烧伤入住本中心的成年插管患者的回顾性研究。插管标准定义为传统标准(疑似烟雾吸入、口咽烟灰、声音嘶哑、吞咽困难、面部毛发烧焦、口腔水肿、口腔烧伤、非全层面部烧伤),或2011年美国烧伤协会(ABA)指南定义的ABA标准(全层面部烧伤、喘鸣、呼吸窘迫、喉镜检查时肿胀、上呼吸道创伤、意识改变、低氧血症/高碳酸血症、血流动力学不稳定)。在28天内机械通气时间少于26天(无呼吸机天数(VFD))的患者被视为需要长期插管。VFD≥26天的患者被视为不必要的短期插管。

结果

218例患者中,151例接受长期插管,67例接受短期插管。与传统标准(22.5%)相比,长期插管与ABA标准密切相关(77.5%)(p<0.001)。ABA标准对长期插管的敏感性为77%,特异性为46%。与长期插管相关的传统标准包括疑似烟雾吸入(比值比(OR)2.45 [95%可信区间(CI),1.18 - 5.11])和面部毛发烧焦(OR 2.53 [95% CI,1.25 - 5.09])。将这些标准加入ABA标准后形成了丹佛标准,该标准对长期插管的敏感性增加(95%),但特异性降低(24%)。

结论

对于符合丹佛标准的患者应考虑插管,丹佛标准包括全层面部烧伤、喘鸣、呼吸窘迫、喉镜检查时肿胀、上呼吸道创伤、意识改变、低氧血症/高碳酸血症、血流动力学不稳定、疑似烟雾吸入和面部毛发烧焦。缺乏这些标准的患者不应插管。

相似文献

1
Defining the criteria for intubation of the patient with thermal burns.确定热烧伤患者的插管标准。
Burns. 2018 May;44(3):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Determining the role of nasolaryngoscopy in the initial evaluation for upper airway injury in patients with facial burns.确定鼻咽喉镜检查在面部烧伤患者上呼吸道损伤初始评估中的作用。
Burns. 2018 May;44(3):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
More Than One Third of Intubations in Patients Transferred to Burn Centers are Unnecessary: Proposed Guidelines for Appropriate Intubation of the Burn Patient.转入烧伤中心的患者中超过三分之一的插管是不必要的:烧伤患者适当插管的拟议指南。
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):e409-14. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000288.
4
Preventing Unnecessary Intubations: A 5-Year Regional Burn Center Experience Using Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy for Airway Evaluation in Patients With Suspected Inhalation or Airway Injury.预防不必要的气管插管:一家地区烧伤中心5年使用可弯曲纤维喉镜对疑似吸入性损伤或气道损伤患者进行气道评估的经验。
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Apr 26;40(3):341-346. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz016.
5
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated burn patients: An analysis of risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes using the Berlin ARDS definition.机械通气烧伤患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS):使用柏林ARDS定义对危险因素、临床特征及预后的分析
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1423-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.01.031. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
A novel scale for predicting delayed intubation in patients with inhalation injury.一种预测吸入性损伤患者延迟插管的新量表。
Burns. 2020 Aug;46(5):1201-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Intubation in burns patients: a 5-year review of the Manchester regional burns centre experience.烧伤患者的插管:曼彻斯特地区烧伤中心 5 年经验回顾。
Burns. 2021 May;47(3):576-586. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Factors that predict the need for intubation in patients with smoke inhalation injury.预测烟雾吸入性损伤患者插管需求的因素。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2006 Apr;85(4):278-80.
9
Acute management of the upper airway in facial burns and smoke inhalation.面部烧伤和烟雾吸入时上呼吸道的急性处理
Arch Surg. 1976 Jul;111(7):744-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360250020003.
10
Evaluating Pre Burn Center Intubation Practices: An Update.评估烧伤中心插管前的操作规范:最新进展
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e23-e29. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000457.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Face and Neck Burns on Respiratory Complications and Mortality.面部和颈部烧伤对呼吸并发症及死亡率的影响。
Eur Burn J. 2025 May 22;6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/ebj6020027.
2
Emergency Treatment of Burns in Adults-Characteristics of Adult Patients and Acute/Pre-Hospital Burn Management.成人烧伤的急诊治疗——成年患者的特征及急性/院前烧伤处理
Eur Burn J. 2025 Apr 10;6(2):19. doi: 10.3390/ebj6020019.
3
Update burn surgery: overview of current multidisciplinary treatment concepts.烧伤外科进展:当前多学科治疗理念概述
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Aug 23;9(4):181-190. doi: 10.1515/iss-2024-0020. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Prehospital treatment of severely burned patients: a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the Berlin burn centre.严重烧伤患者的院前治疗:柏林烧伤中心收治患者的回顾性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 14;32(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01239-5.
5
[EXTUBATION FAILURE IN BURNS: INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS AND PROGNOSIS].[烧伤患者拔管失败:发生率、危险因素及预后]
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2024 Jun 30;37(2):112-117. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Inhalation Injury.吸入性损伤
Semin Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 4;38(2):93-96. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782646. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Airway Management for Acute and Reconstructive Burns: Our 30-year Experience.急性和重建性烧伤的气道管理:我们30年的经验
Semin Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 26;38(2):97-104. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786008. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Ventilation practices in burn patients-an international prospective observational cohort study.烧伤患者的通气实践——一项国际前瞻性观察队列研究。
Burns Trauma. 2021 Dec 16;9:tkab034. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab034. eCollection 2021.
9
Recommendations for burns care in mass casualty incidents: WHO Emergency Medical Teams Technical Working Group on Burns (WHO TWGB) 2017-2020.批量伤患事件中的烧伤处理建议:世界卫生组织烧伤紧急医疗队技术工作组(2017-2020 年)。
Burns. 2021 Mar;47(2):349-370. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Inhalation Injury: Unmet Clinical Needs and Future Research.吸入性损伤:未满足的临床需求与未来研究
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Aug 14;40(5):570-584. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz055.