van Roekel Caren, Harlianto Netanja I, Braat Arthur J A T, Prince Jip F, van den Hoven Andor F, Bruijnen Rutger C G, Lam Marnix G E H, Smits Maarten L J
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1593-1599. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day treatment, including the simulation procedure for assessment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic distribution of the microspheres, with holmium-166 (Ho)-radioembolization.
This was a secondary analysis of patients included in the 4 prospective studies (HEPAR I, HEPAR II, HEPAR PLuS, and SIM) on Ho-radioembolization. The technical success rate of the same-day treatment protocol, defined as the number of patients who completed the same-day treatment, was measured. Total in-room time, duration of the scout procedure, time to imaging, and duration of the treatment procedure were recorded. Reasons for discontinuation or adjustment of treatment were identified. Adverse events that occurred during the treatment day were recorded.
One hundred five of 120 scheduled patients completed the same-day treatment with Ho-radioembolization (success rate, 88%). After the simulation procedure, treatment was cancelled in 15 patients because of extrahepatic deposition (n = 8), suboptimal tumor targeting (n = 1), unanticipated vascular anatomy (n = 5), and dissection (n = 1). In another 14 patients, the treatment plan was adjusted. The median total procedure time (ie, simulation, imaging, and treatment) was 6:39 hours:minutes (range, 3:58-9:17 hours:minutes). Back pain was a major same-day treatment-related complaint (n = 28).
Ho-radioembolization as a same-day treatment procedure is feasible in most selected patients, although treatment was adjusted in 12% of patients and cancelled in 12% of patients. This approach might be beneficial for a select patient population, such as patients needing a radiation segmentectomy.
评估钬 - 166(Ho)放射性栓塞进行当日治疗的安全性和可行性,包括评估微球肝内和肝外分布的模拟程序。
这是对纳入4项关于Ho放射性栓塞的前瞻性研究(HEPAR I、HEPAR II、HEPAR PLuS和SIM)的患者进行的二次分析。测量当日治疗方案的技术成功率,定义为完成当日治疗的患者数量。记录总室内时间、定位扫描程序持续时间、成像时间和治疗程序持续时间。确定治疗中断或调整的原因。记录治疗当天发生的不良事件。
120例计划患者中有105例完成了Ho放射性栓塞当日治疗(成功率88%)。模拟程序后,15例患者因肝外沉积(n = 8)、肿瘤靶向欠佳(n = 1)、意外血管解剖(n = 5)和解剖(n = 1)而取消治疗。另外14例患者的治疗计划进行了调整。总手术时间中位数(即模拟、成像和治疗)为6小时39分钟(范围3小时58分钟至9小时17分钟)。背痛是与当日治疗相关的主要主诉(n = 28)。
Ho放射性栓塞作为当日治疗程序在大多数选定患者中是可行的,尽管12%的患者治疗计划进行了调整,12%的患者治疗被取消。这种方法可能对特定患者群体有益,例如需要进行放射段切除术的患者。