• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死中的性别差异:生物学因素还是偏见?

Sex Disparities in Myocardial Infarction: Biology or Bias?

机构信息

Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2020.06.025
PMID:32861583
Abstract

Women have generally worse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) compared to men. The reasons for these disparities are multifactorial. At the beginning is the notion-widespread in the community and health care providers-that women are at low risk for MI. This can impact on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women, with lower use of preventative therapies and lifestyle counselling. It can also lead to delays in presentation in the event of an acute MI, both at the patient and health care provider level. This is of particular concern in the case of ST elevation MI (STEMI), where "time is muscle". Even after first medical contact, women with acute MI experience delays to diagnosis with less timely reperfusion and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared to men, women are less likely to undergo invasive diagnostic testing or PCI. After being diagnosed with a STEMI, women receive less guideline-directed medical therapy and potent antiplatelets than men. The consequences of these discrepancies are significant-with higher mortality, major cardiovascular events and bleeding after MI in women compared to men. We review the sex disparities in pathophysiology, risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for acute MI, to answer the question: are they due to biology or bias, or both?

摘要

女性在心肌梗死 (MI) 后的结局通常比男性差。造成这些差异的原因是多方面的。首先,有一种观念在社区和医疗保健提供者中广泛存在,即女性患 MI 的风险较低。这可能会影响女性心血管疾病的一级预防,预防性治疗和生活方式咨询的使用率较低。这也可能导致急性 MI 发作时的就诊延迟,无论是在患者还是医疗保健提供者层面。在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (STEMI) 的情况下,情况尤其如此,因为“时间就是心肌”。即使在首次医疗接触后,女性急性 MI 患者的诊断也会延迟,再灌注和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的时间也更不及时。与男性相比,女性不太可能接受有创性诊断性检查或 PCI。女性在诊断为 STEMI 后,接受的指南指导的药物治疗和强效抗血小板药物治疗也比男性少。这些差异的后果是显著的——与男性相比,女性的死亡率、主要心血管事件和 MI 后的出血率更高。我们回顾了急性 MI 的病理生理学、危险因素、表现、诊断、治疗和结局方面的性别差异,以回答以下问题:这些差异是由生物学因素还是偏见造成的,或者两者皆有?

相似文献

1
Sex Disparities in Myocardial Infarction: Biology or Bias?心肌梗死中的性别差异:生物学因素还是偏见?
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Healthcare disparities for women hospitalized with myocardial infarction and angina.女性心肌梗死和心绞痛住院的医疗保健差异。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Apr 1;6(2):156-165. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz040.
3
Sex Differences Persist in Time to Presentation, Revascularization, and Mortality in Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.性别差异在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心肌梗死患者的就诊时间、血运重建和死亡率方面仍然存在。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e012161. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012161.
4
Trends in Gender Differences in Cardiac Care and Outcome After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Western Sweden: A Report From the Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART).瑞典西部急性心肌梗死后心脏护理与预后的性别差异趋势:来自瑞典心脏病循证护理强化网络系统(SWEDEHEART)的报告,该系统根据推荐疗法进行评估
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 14;4(7):e001995. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001995.
5
Contemporary Determinants of Delayed Benchmark Timelines in Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men and Women.男性和女性急性心肌梗死中延迟基准时间线的当代决定因素
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 15;120(10):1715-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.085. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Gender differences in the outcome of cardiac interventions.心脏介入治疗结果中的性别差异。
Herz. 2005 Aug;30(5):375-89. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2716-3.
7
Impact of gender on treatment and clinical outcomes in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction patients in Thailand.性别对泰国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者治疗及临床结局的影响
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90 Suppl 1:65-73.
8
Age-Related Sex Differences in Clinical Presentation, Management, and Outcomes in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Pooled Analysis of 15 532 Patients From 7 Arabian Gulf Registries.年龄相关的性别差异在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的临床表现、治疗和结局中的作用:7 个阿拉伯海湾注册中心的 15532 例患者的汇总分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e013880. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013880. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
9
Clinical Presentation, Quality of Care, Risk Factors and Outcomes in Women with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): An Observational Report from Six Middle Eastern Countries.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)女性患者的临床表现、护理质量、危险因素和结局:来自六个中东国家的观察性报告。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2019;17(4):388-395. doi: 10.2174/1570161116666180315104820.
10
Treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study.COVID-19大流行期间急性心肌梗死的治疗延误及院内结局:一项全国性研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2020 Nov;24(5):334-342. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.98607.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term clinical impact of sex disparities in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者性别差异的长期临床影响:对调整后的观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e096334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096334.
2
Sex-related differences in acute coronary syndrome: insights from an observational study in a Yemeni cohort.急性冠状动脉综合征中的性别差异:来自也门队列观察性研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 3;12:1481917. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1481917. eCollection 2025.
3
Direct economic burden of acute coronary syndromes in the Portuguese National Health Service-facts and trends between 2002 and 2022.
葡萄牙国家医疗服务体系中急性冠脉综合征的直接经济负担——2002年至2022年的事实与趋势
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1433307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1433307. eCollection 2025.
4
Gender inequalities in prescribing and initiation patterns of guideline-recommended drugs after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后指南推荐药物的处方和起始用药模式中的性别不平等现象。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21396-1.
5
Sex Differences in Management, Time to Intervention, and In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死及非心肌梗死相关心源性休克在治疗、干预时机及院内死亡率方面的性别差异
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 31;14(1):180. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010180.
6
Sex and Racial Disparities in Proportionate Mortality of Premature Myocardial Infarction in the United States: 1999 to 2020.美国 1999 年至 2020 年早产心肌梗死患者比例死亡率的性别和种族差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):e033515. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033515. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Beyond the GRACE ACS Score: Do We Need a Different Model for Men and Women after STEMI?超越 GRACE ACS 评分:STEMI 后男性和女性需要不同的模型吗?
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Apr;121(4):e20230060. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230060.
8
Management of cardiac emergencies in women: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the Heart Failure Association (HFA), and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.女性心脏急症的管理:欧洲心脏病学会急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)、心力衰竭协会(HFA)、欧洲心律协会(EHRA)以及欧洲心脏病学会心血管药物治疗工作组的临床共识声明
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Feb 26;4(2):oeae011. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae011. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果方面差距的缩小;从风险评估到转诊途径及结果。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Nov 5;24:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
A survey of undergraduate medical students' gender awareness and bias: the Newfoundland and Labrador perspective.一项针对本科医学生性别意识和偏见的调查:纽芬兰和拉布拉多的观点。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):48-55. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75919. eCollection 2024 Feb.