Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;13(12):2576-2587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
This study is to determine the management and clinical outcomes of patients investigated with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) according to sex.
Women are underdiagnosed with conventional ischemia testing, have lower rates of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at invasive coronary angiography (ICA), yet higher mortality compared to men. Whether FFR improves sex-based patient management decisions compared to CCTA alone is unknown.
Subjects with symptoms and CAD on CCTA were enrolled (2015 to 2017). Demographics, symptom status, CCTA anatomy, coronary volume to myocardial mass ratio (V/M), lowest FFR values, and management plans were captured. Endpoints included reclassification rate between CCTA and FFR management plans, incidence of ICA demonstrating obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) and revascularization rates.
A total of 4,737 patients (n = 1,603 females, 33.8%) underwent CCTA and FFR. Women were older (age 68 ± 10 years vs. 65 ± 10 years; p < 0.0001) with more atypical symptoms (41.5% vs. 33.9%; p < 0.0001). Women had less obstructive CAD (65.4% vs. 74.7%; p < 0.0001) at CCTA, higher FFR (0.76 ± 0.10 vs. 0.73 ± 0.10; p < 0.0001), and lower likelihood of positive FFR ≤ 0.80 for the same degree stenosis (p < 0.0001). A positive FFR ≤0.80 resulted in equal referral to ICA (n = 510 [54.5%] vs. n = 1,249 [56.5%]; p = 0.31), but more nonobstructive CAD (n = 208 [32.1%] vs. n = 354 [24.5%]; p = 0.0003) and less revascularization (n = 294 [31.4%] vs. n = 800 [36.2%]; p < 0.0001) in women, unless the FFR was ≤0.75 where revascularization rates were similar (n = 253 [41.9%] vs. n = 715 [46.4%]; p = 0.06). Women have a higher V/M ratio (26.17 ± 7.58 mm/g vs. 24.76 ± 7.22 mm/g; p < 0.0001) that is associated with higher FFR independent of degree stenosis (p < 0.001). Predictors of revascularization included stenosis severity, FFR symptoms, and V/M ratio (p < 0.001) but not female sex (p = 0.284).
FFR differs between the sexes, as women have a higher FFR for the same degree of stenosis. In FFR-positive CAD, women have less obstructive CAD at ICA and less revascularization, which is associated with higher V/M ratio. The findings suggest that CAD and FFR variations by sex need specific interpretation as these differences may affect therapeutic decision making and clinical outcomes. (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care [ADVANCE]; NCT02499679).
本研究旨在确定根据性别对接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)衍生的血流储备分数(FFR)检查的患者进行管理和临床结局。
女性在传统缺血检测中被漏诊,在有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)检查中,其阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的发生率较低,但与男性相比,死亡率更高。FFR 是否比单独的 CCTA 更能改善基于性别的患者管理决策尚不清楚。
纳入了有症状和 CAD 的 CCTA 患者(2015 年至 2017 年)。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、症状状态、CCTA 解剖结构、冠脉容积与心肌质量比(V/M)、最低 FFR 值和管理计划。主要终点包括 CCTA 和 FFR 管理计划之间的再分类率、ICA 显示的阻塞性 CAD(≥50%狭窄)的发生率和血运重建率。
共有 4737 名患者(n=1603 名女性,33.8%)接受了 CCTA 和 FFR 检查。女性年龄较大(68±10 岁 vs. 65±10 岁;p<0.0001),症状更不典型(41.5% vs. 33.9%;p<0.0001)。女性在 CCTA 检查中,CAD 病变程度较轻(65.4% vs. 74.7%;p<0.0001),FFR 较高(0.76±0.10 vs. 0.73±0.10;p<0.0001),且相同狭窄程度下 FFR≤0.80 的阳性率较低(p<0.0001)。FFR≤0.80 阳性结果导致同样比例的患者被转诊至 ICA(n=510 [54.5%] vs. n=1249 [56.5%];p=0.31),但非阻塞性 CAD 病变程度更严重(n=208 [32.1%] vs. n=354 [24.5%];p=0.0003),血运重建率较低(n=294 [31.4%] vs. n=800 [36.2%];p<0.0001),除非 FFR≤0.75,此时血运重建率相似(n=253 [41.9%] vs. n=715 [46.4%];p=0.06)。女性的 V/M 比值较高(26.17±7.58mm/g vs. 24.76±7.22mm/g;p<0.0001),与狭窄程度无关,与 FFR 独立相关(p<0.001)。血运重建的预测因素包括狭窄严重程度、FFR 症状和 V/M 比值(p<0.001),而不是性别(p=0.284)。
FFR 在性别之间存在差异,女性在相同的狭窄程度下具有较高的 FFR。在 FFR 阳性 CAD 中,女性在 ICA 检查中,阻塞性 CAD 程度较轻,血运重建率较低,这与较高的 V/M 比值有关。这些发现表明,性别差异对 CAD 和 FFR 可能需要进行具体的解释,因为这些差异可能会影响治疗决策和临床结局。(评估冠状动脉护理中无创 FFRCT 的诊断价值 [ADVANCE];NCT02499679)。