Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa). Carretera de Valldemossa, 79 Hospital Universitario Son Espases. Edificio S. 07120 Palma, Illes Balears, Spain; Balearic Islands Health Services, Primary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Palma, Illes Balears, Spain; University of Balearic Islands (UIB), Department of Psychology, Carretera de Valldemossa, km 7.5. 07122, Palma, Illes Balears, Spain.
Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Oslo, Norway; Facultad de Cultura Física, Deporte y Recreación. Universidad Santo Tomás. Bogotá, Colombia.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.034. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
This study aimed at examining the impact of providing healthcare during health emergencies caused by viral epidemic outbreaks on healthcare workers' (HCWs) mental health; to identify factors associated with worse impact, and; to assess the available evidence base regarding interventions to reduce such impact.
Rapid systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO (inception to August 2020). We pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of specific mental health problems, and used GRADE to ascertain the certainty of evidence.
We included 117 studies. The pooled prevalence was higher for acute stress disorder (40% (95%CI 39 to 41%)), followed by anxiety (30%, (30 to 31%)), burnout (28% (26 to 31%)), depression (24% (24 to 25%)), and post-traumatic stress disorder (13% (13 to 14%)). We identified factors associated with the likelihood of developing those problems, including sociodemographic (younger age and female gender), social (lack of social support, stigmatization), and occupational (working in a high-risk environment, specific occupational roles, and lower levels of specialised training and job experience) factors. Four studies reported interventions for frontline HCW: two educational interventions increased confidence in pandemic self-efficacy and in interpersonal problems solving (very low certainty), whereas one multifaceted intervention improved anxiety, depression, and sleep quality (very low certainty).
We only searched three databases, and the initial screening was undertaken by a single reviewer.
Given the very limited evidence regarding the impact of interventions to tackle mental health problems in HCWs, the risk factors identified represent important targets for future interventions.
本研究旨在考察在病毒性疫情爆发引起的卫生紧急情况下为医护人员(HCWs)提供医疗保健对其心理健康的影响;确定与更严重影响相关的因素;并评估减少此类影响的干预措施的现有证据基础。
快速系统评价。我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO(从建库到 2020 年 8 月)。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总数据,以估计特定心理健康问题的患病率,并使用 GRADE 确定证据的确定性。
我们纳入了 117 项研究。急性应激障碍(40%(95%CI 39 至 41%))的总体患病率较高,其次是焦虑症(30%(30 至 31%))、倦怠(28%(26 至 31%))、抑郁症(24%(24 至 25%))和创伤后应激障碍(13%(13 至 14%))。我们确定了与发生这些问题的可能性相关的因素,包括社会人口统计学因素(年龄较小和女性)、社会因素(缺乏社会支持、污名化)和职业因素(在高风险环境中工作、特定职业角色、以及较低水平的专业培训和工作经验)。四项研究报告了针对一线 HCW 的干预措施:两项教育干预措施提高了对大流行自我效能和人际问题解决的信心(非常低的确定性),而一项多方面的干预措施改善了焦虑、抑郁和睡眠质量(非常低的确定性)。
我们仅搜索了三个数据库,并且初步筛选由一名审查员完成。
鉴于针对 HCWs 心理健康问题的干预措施的影响的证据非常有限,确定的风险因素代表了未来干预措施的重要目标。