Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.076. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
With an aging population, the number of patients on antiplatelet medications and traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasing. Our study aimed to evaluate the role of platelet transfusion on outcomes after traumatic intracranial bleeding (IB) in these patients.
We analyzed our prospectively maintained TBI database from 2014 to 2016. We included all isolated TBI patients with an IB, who were on preinjury antiplatelet agents and excluded patients taking anticoagulants. Outcome measures included the progression of IB, neurosurgical intervention, and mortality. Regression analysis was performed.
A total of 343 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 58 ± 11 y, 58% were men, and median injury severity score was 15 (10-24). Distribution of antiplatelet agents was as follows: aspirin (60%) and clopidogrel (35%). Overall, 74% patients received platelet transfusion after admission with a median number of two platelet units. After controlling for confounders, patients who received one unit of pooled platelets had no difference in progression of IB (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98, [0.6-1.9], P = 0.41), need for neurosurgical intervention (OR: 1.09, [0.7-2.5], P = 0.53), and mortality (OR: 0.84, [0.6-1.8], P = 0.51). However, patients who received two units of pooled platelets had lower rate of progression of IB (OR: 0.69, [0.4-0.8], P = 0.02), the need for neurosurgical intervention (OR: 0.81, [0.3-0.9], P = 0.03), and mortality (OR: 0.84, [0.5-0.9], P = 0.04). Both groups were compared with those who did not receive platelet transfusion.
The use of two units of platelet may decrease the risk of IB progression, neurosurgical intervention, and mortality in patients on preinjury antiplatelet agents and TBI. Further studies should focus on developing protocols for platelet transfusion to improve outcomes in these patients.
Level III prognostic.
随着人口老龄化,使用抗血小板药物和创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的患者数量正在增加。我们的研究旨在评估这些患者创伤性颅内出血(IB)后血小板输注对结局的影响。
我们分析了 2014 年至 2016 年我们前瞻性维护的 TBI 数据库。我们纳入了所有有孤立性 TBI 伴 IB 的患者,这些患者均在受伤前使用抗血小板药物,且排除了使用抗凝药物的患者。结局评估包括 IB 进展、神经外科干预和死亡率。我们进行了回归分析。
共纳入 343 例患者,平均年龄为 58 ± 11 岁,58%为男性,损伤严重程度评分中位数为 15(10-24)。抗血小板药物分布如下:阿司匹林(60%)和氯吡格雷(35%)。总体而言,74%的患者在入院后接受了血小板输注,中位数输注 2 个单位血小板。在控制混杂因素后,输注 1 单位混合血小板的患者 IB 进展(比值比[OR]:0.98,[0.6-1.9],P=0.41)、需要神经外科干预(OR:1.09,[0.7-2.5],P=0.53)和死亡率(OR:0.84,[0.6-1.8],P=0.51)无差异。然而,输注 2 单位混合血小板的患者 IB 进展率较低(OR:0.69,[0.4-0.8],P=0.02)、需要神经外科干预(OR:0.81,[0.3-0.9],P=0.03)和死亡率(OR:0.84,[0.5-0.9],P=0.04)。这两组与未接受血小板输注的患者相比。
对于受伤前使用抗血小板药物和 TBI 的患者,输注 2 单位血小板可能会降低 IB 进展、神经外科干预和死亡率的风险。应进一步研究制定血小板输注方案,以改善这些患者的结局。
III 级预后。