• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私人医疗保险市场中高和低剩余支出者:德国、荷兰和美国市场。

Very high and low residual spenders in private health insurance markets: Germany, The Netherlands and the U.S. Marketplaces.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Institute for Health Care Management and Research, CINCH, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Feb;22(1):35-50. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01227-3. Epub 2020 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01227-3
PMID:32862358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7822791/
Abstract

We study the extremely high and low residual spenders in individual health insurance markets in three countries. A high (low) residual spender is someone for whom the residual-spending less payment (from premiums and risk adjustment)-is high (low), indicating that the person is highly underpaid (overpaid). We begin with descriptive analysis of the top and bottom 1% and 0.1% of residuals building to address the question of the degree of persistence in membership at the extremes. Common findings emerge among the countries. First, the diseases found among those with the highest residual spending are also disproportionately found among those with the lowest residual spending. Second, those at the top of the residual spending distribution (where spending exceeds payments the most) account for a massively high share of the unexplained variance in the predictions from the risk adjustment model. Third, in terms of persistence, we find that membership in the extremes of the residual spending distribution is highly persistent, raising concerns about selection-related incentives targeting these individuals. As our results show, the one-in-a-thousand people (on both sides of the residual distribution) play an outsized role in creating adverse incentives associated with health plan payment systems. In response to the observed importance of the extremes of the residual spending distribution, we propose an innovative combination of risk-pooling and reinsurance targeting the predictively undercompensated group. In all three countries, this form of risk sharing substantially improves the overall fit of payments to spending. Perhaps surprisingly, by reducing the burden on diagnostic indicators to predict high payments, our proposed risk sharing policy reduces the gap between payments and spending not only for the most undercompensated individuals but also for the most overcompensated people.

摘要

我们研究了三个国家的个人医疗保险市场中极高和极低的剩余支出者。高(低)剩余支出者是指剩余支出(保费和风险调整后)较高(低)的人,这表明该人被严重低估(高估)了。我们首先对前 1%和 0.1%的剩余部分进行描述性分析,以解决在极端情况下会员资格持续存在的程度问题。这三个国家有一些共同的发现。首先,在剩余支出最高的人群中发现的疾病,在剩余支出最低的人群中也不成比例地存在。其次,在剩余支出分布的顶端(支出超过支付最多的地方),占风险调整模型预测中无法解释的方差的比例非常高。第三,就持续性而言,我们发现,在剩余支出分布的极端情况下,会员资格高度持久,这引发了对针对这些个体的与选择相关的激励措施的关注。正如我们的研究结果所表明的那样,千分之一的人(在剩余分布的两侧)在创造与健康计划支付系统相关的不利激励方面发挥了巨大作用。针对剩余支出分布极端重要性的问题,我们提出了一种创新的风险池化和再保险组合,针对预测性补偿不足的群体。在所有三个国家,这种形式的风险分担都大大提高了支付与支出的整体匹配度。也许令人惊讶的是,通过减少预测高支付所需的诊断指标的负担,我们提出的风险分担政策不仅减少了最补偿不足的个体的支付与支出之间的差距,也减少了最补偿过度的个体的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/2139146183da/10198_2020_1227_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/39e5bb118f78/10198_2020_1227_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/0a9543390942/10198_2020_1227_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/2139146183da/10198_2020_1227_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/39e5bb118f78/10198_2020_1227_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/0a9543390942/10198_2020_1227_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc8/7822791/2139146183da/10198_2020_1227_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Very high and low residual spenders in private health insurance markets: Germany, The Netherlands and the U.S. Marketplaces.私人医疗保险市场中高和低剩余支出者:德国、荷兰和美国市场。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Feb;22(1):35-50. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01227-3. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
2
Extreme under and overcompensation in morbidity-based health plan payments: The case of Switzerland.基于发病率的医疗保险支付中的过度补偿和不足补偿:瑞士的案例。
Health Policy. 2020 Jan;124(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
3
How to deal with persistently low/high spenders in health plan payment systems?如何应对医保支付系统中持续的高/低费用支出者?
Health Econ. 2022 May;31(5):784-805. doi: 10.1002/hec.4477. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Examining unpriced risk heterogeneity in the Dutch health insurance market.考察荷兰健康保险市场中未定价风险的异质性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1351-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0979-x. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Persistence in health expenditures in the short run: prevalence and consequences.短期内医疗支出的持续性:患病率及后果
Med Care. 2003 Jul;41(7 Suppl):III53-III64. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000076046.46152.EF.
6
Risk equalization in competitive health insurance markets: Identifying healthy individuals on the basis of multiple-year low spending.竞争性健康保险市场中的风险均衡:基于多年低支出识别健康个体。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):455-465. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13065. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
High-risk pooling for mitigating risk selection incentives in health insurance markets with sophisticated risk equalization: an application based on health survey information.高风险池在医疗保险市场中缓解复杂风险均衡的风险选择激励:基于健康调查信息的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10774-x.
8
The power of reinsurance in health insurance exchanges to improve the fit of the payment system and reduce incentives for adverse selection.再保险在医疗保险交易所中改善支付系统适配性并减少逆向选择诱因的作用。
Inquiry. 2013 Nov;50(4):255-74. doi: 10.1177/0046958014538913.
9
The effect of reinsuring a deductible on pharmaceutical spending: A Dutch case study on low-income people.对免赔额进行再保险对药品支出的影响:一项针对低收入人群的荷兰案例研究。
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):976-981. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Fair regression for health care spending.公平回归医疗支出。
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):973-982. doi: 10.1111/biom.13206. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to International Universal Health Coverage Reforms: A Realist Review.国际全民健康覆盖改革的障碍与促进因素:一项现实主义综述
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8709. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8709. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
Characterizing a heterogeneous chronic patient population for redesigning person-centred bundled payment models using risk-mitigating measures.利用风险缓解措施对异质性慢性患者群体进行特征分析,以重新设计以患者为中心的捆绑支付模式。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01762-x.
3
A critical review of the use of R in risk equalization research.

本文引用的文献

1
Mandatory high-risk pooling: an approach to reducing incentives for cream skimming.强制性高风险集合:一种减少撇脂动机的方法。
Inquiry. 1996 Summer;33(2):133-43.
对R在风险均等化研究中的应用的批判性综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr;26(3):363-375. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01709-8. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
4
A framework for ex-ante evaluation of the potential effects of risk equalization and risk sharing in health insurance markets with regulated competition.一个用于对具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中风险均等化和风险分担的潜在影响进行事前评估的框架。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4.
5
Scope and Incentives for Risk Selection in Health Insurance Markets With Regulated Competition: A Conceptual Framework and International Comparison.具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中的风险选择范围和激励措施:概念框架与国际比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):175-194. doi: 10.1177/10775587231222584. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
6
Heteroscedasticity of residual spending after risk equalization: a potential source of selection incentives in health insurance markets with premium regulation.风险均衡后剩余支出的异方差性:保费监管下医疗保险市场中选择激励的潜在来源。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Apr;25(3):379-396. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01592-9. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising.《与平价医疗法案(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)顾问计划资金削减相关联的私人赞助电视广告》
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2224651. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24651.
8
Sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures as a basis for improving hospital payments systems.基于改善医院支付系统的考虑,对心脏相关手术的护理复杂性和成本的性别差异进行分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jun;24(4):539-556. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01496-0. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
Adopting localised health financing models for universal health coverage in Low and middle-income countries: lessons from the National Health lnsurance Scheme in Ghana.在低收入和中等收入国家采用本地化卫生筹资模式以实现全民健康覆盖:来自加纳国家健康保险计划的经验教训
Heliyon. 2021 Jun 5;7(6):e07220. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07220. eCollection 2021 Jun.