• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉综合征未行血运重建治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的长期出血风险预测

Long-Term Bleeding Risk Prediction with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated Without Revascularization.

作者信息

Marquis-Gravel Guillaume, Neely Megan L, Valgimigli Marco, Costa Francesco, Van Klaveren David, Altner Rituparna, Bhatt Deepak L, Armstrong Paul W, Fox Keith A A, White Harvey D, Ohman E Magnus, Roe Matthew T

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (G.M.G., M.L.N., R.A., E.M.O., M.T.R.).

Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland (M.V., F.C.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006582. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006582
PMID:32862694
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal bleeding risk scores have been validated in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention. How these scores apply to the population of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated without revascularization remains unknown. The objective was to evaluate and compare the performances of the PRECISE-DAPT, PARIS, and DAPT (bleeding component) bleeding risk scores in the medically managed patients with ACS treated with DAPT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TRILOGY ACS (Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted from 2008 to 2012 over a median follow-up of 17.0 months in 966 sites (52 countries). High-risk patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who did not undergo revascularization were randomized to prasugrel or clopidogrel. The PRECISE-DAPT, PARIS, and DAPT (bleeding component) risk scores were applied in the TRILOGY ACS population to evaluate their performance to predict adjudicated non-coronary artery bypass grafting-related GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) severe/life-threatening/moderate and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) major/minor bleeding with time-dependent c-indices. Among the 9326 participants, median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 59-74 years), and 3650 were females (39.1%). A total of 158 (1.69%) GUSTO severe/life-threatening/moderate and 174 (1.87%) TIMI major/minor non-coronary artery bypass grafting bleeding events occurred. The c-indices (95% CI) of the PRECISE-DAPT, PARIS, and DAPT (bleeding component) scores through 12 months were 0.716 (0.677-0.758), 0.693 (0.658-0.733), and 0.674 (0.637-0.713), respectively, for GUSTO bleeding and 0.624 (0.582-0.666), 0.612 (0.578-0.651), and 0.608 (0.571-0.649), respectively, for TIMI bleeding. There was no significant difference in the c-indices of each score based upon pairwise comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Among medically managed patients with ACS treated with DAPT, the performances of the PRECISE-DAPT, PARIS, and DAPT (bleeding component) scores were reasonable and similar to their performances in the derivation percutaneous coronary intervention populations. Bleeding risk scores may be used to predict longitudinal bleeding risk in patients with ACS treated with DAPT without revascularization and help support shared decision making. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00699998.

摘要

背景

纵向出血风险评分已在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的患者中得到验证。这些评分如何应用于未进行血运重建治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者群体仍不清楚。目的是评估和比较PRECISE-DAPT、PARIS和DAPT(出血部分)出血风险评分在接受DAPT治疗的药物治疗ACS患者中的表现。

方法和结果

TRILOGY ACS(靶向血小板抑制以明确药物治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的最佳策略)是一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机试验,于2008年至2012年进行,在966个地点(52个国家)进行了为期17.0个月的中位随访。未进行血运重建的高危不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者被随机分配接受普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗。将PRECISE-DAPT、PARIS和DAPT(出血部分)风险评分应用于TRILOGY ACS人群,以评估其预测经判定的非冠状动脉旁路移植术相关的全球急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(GUSTO,全球应用策略开通闭塞冠状动脉)严重/危及生命/中度出血以及心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)主要/次要出血的表现,并计算时间依赖性c指数。在9326名参与者中,中位年龄为66岁(四分位间距,59 - 74岁),女性有3650名(39.1%)。共发生158例(1.69%)GUSTO严重/危及生命/中度出血事件和174例(1.87%)TIMI主要/次要非冠状动脉旁路移植术出血事件。PRECISE-DAPT、PARIS和DAPT(出血部分)评分在12个月时对于GUSTO出血的c指数(95%CI)分别为0.716(0.677 - 0.758)、0.693(0.658 - 0.733)和0.674(0.637 - 0.713),对于TIMI出血的c指数分别为0.624(0.582 - 0.666)、0.612(0.578 - 0.651)和0.608(0.571 - 0.649)。基于两两比较,各评分的c指数无显著差异。

结论

在接受DAPT治疗的药物治疗ACS患者中,PRECISE-DAPT、PARIS和DAPT(出血部分)评分的表现合理,且与它们在推导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗人群中的表现相似。出血风险评分可用于预测未进行血运重建的接受DAPT治疗的ACS患者的纵向出血风险,并有助于支持共同决策。注册信息:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT00699998。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Bleeding Risk Prediction with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated Without Revascularization.急性冠脉综合征未行血运重建治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的长期出血风险预测
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006582. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Relationship of Platelet Reactivity With Bleeding Outcomes During Long-Term Treatment With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Medically Managed Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.对于接受药物治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者,双联抗血小板治疗长期治疗期间血小板反应性与出血结局的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 4;5(11):e003977. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003977.
3
Predicting the risk of bleeding during dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndromes.预测急性冠脉综合征后双联抗血小板治疗期间的出血风险。
Heart. 2017 Aug;103(15):1168-1176. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310090. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Clinical Usefulness of PRECISE-DAPT Score for Predicting Bleeding Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis From the SMART-DATE Randomized Trial.PRECISE-DAPT 评分预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者出血事件的临床价值:来自 SMART-DATE 随机试验的分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May;13(5):e008530. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008530. Epub 2020 May 1.
5
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes managed without revascularization: insights into the safety of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with reduced-dose prasugrel versus standard-dose clopidogrel.未进行血运重建治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征老年患者:探讨长期应用小剂量普拉格雷双联抗血小板治疗与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比的安全性。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 20;128(8):823-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002303. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
7
Performance of PRECISE-DAPT Score for Predicting Bleeding Complication During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.PRECISE-DAPT 评分预测双联抗血小板治疗期间出血并发症的表现。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec;11(12):e006837. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006837.
8
Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients.既往使用氯吡格雷对接受药物治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的影响。
Heart. 2016 Aug 1;102(15):1221-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308840. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
Long-term outcomes for women versus men with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction managed medically without revascularization: insights from the TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medicallY manage Acute Coronary Syndromes trial.不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者未经血运重建而接受药物治疗时,女性与男性的长期预后:来自“旨在明确药物治疗急性冠脉综合征的最佳策略的靶向血小板抑制”(TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medicallY manage Acute Coronary Syndromes)试验的见解
Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):695-705.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
10
Study design and rationale of a comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel in medically managed patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medicallY manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial.研究设计和原理:比较普拉格雷和氯吡格雷在接受药物治疗的不稳定型心绞痛/非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的疗效:以血小板靶向抑制明确最佳策略优化急性冠状动脉综合征药物治疗(TRILOGY ACS)试验。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):16-22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for long-term all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.PRECISE-DAPT评分对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心房颤动患者长期全因死亡率的预测价值。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023 Sep;19(3):217-224. doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.131474. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Optimal anti-platelet therapy for older patients with acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising 59,284 older patients.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者的最佳抗血小板治疗:包含 59284 例老年患者的随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Jan;57(1):143-154. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02875-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Assessment of Risk Factors for Drug Resistance of Dual Anti Platelet Therapy After PCI.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后双联抗血小板治疗耐药的危险因素评估。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221083674. doi: 10.1177/10760296221083674.
4
Antiplatelet Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease in 2022-From Population to Patient-Centered Approaches.2022年动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性疾病的抗血小板治疗——从群体到以患者为中心的方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 28;9:805525. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.805525. eCollection 2022.