Suppr超能文献

通过双功超声、静脉内和动脉内数字减影血管造影对颈动脉分叉进行评估。

Evaluation of the carotid bifurcation by duplex ultrasound, intravenous and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

作者信息

Boné G, Ladurner G, Karas I, Grobovschek M, Punzengruber J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Nerve Clinic of the County of Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Neurol. 1988;28(2):73-6. doi: 10.1159/000116233.

Abstract

In 167 patients with cerebrovascular disorders 323 carotid bifurcations were investigated by Duplex ultrasound. In 100 of these patients, additionally intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed and in 35 patients, also intra-arterial DSA was carried out. In 32 patients all three procedures were performed. Comparing the results of Duplex scan and intravenous DSA with intra-arterial DSA it can be concluded that Duplex scan and intravenous DSA are comparable as screening methods for the evaluation of haemodynamically relevant stenoses and occlusions in extracranial artery disease. However, for the evaluation of stenotic vessels of less than 50% lumen reduction the Duplex scan showed a higher agreement rate with a contingency coefficient of 0.957 in comparison to intravenous DSA with a contingency coefficient of 0.903.

摘要

对167例脑血管疾病患者的323个颈动脉分叉进行了双功超声检查。其中100例患者还进行了静脉数字减影血管造影(DSA),35例患者进行了动脉内DSA。32例患者接受了所有三种检查。将双功扫描和静脉DSA的结果与动脉内DSA进行比较,可以得出结论,双功扫描和静脉DSA作为评估颅外动脉疾病中血流动力学相关狭窄和闭塞的筛查方法具有可比性。然而,对于评估管腔缩小小于50%的狭窄血管,双功扫描的一致性率更高,列联系数为0.957,而静脉DSA的列联系数为0.903。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验