Wood G W, Lukin R R, Tomsick T A, Chambers A A
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 May;140(5):855-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.140.5.855.
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with intravenous contrast injection was performed on 500 consecutive adult patients and evaluated for image quality of the carotid artery bifurcations. Diagnostic quality examinations were obtained in 974 common, 925 internal, and 904 external carotid artery segments. Sixty-two patients had standard carotid arteriography around the same time as DSA. Agreement of standard arteriograms with diagnostic quality DSA examinations was noted in 97 of 98 common, 94 of 95 internal, and 79 of 91 external carotid artery segments. All cases of complete carotid occlusion (14 of 14) were correctly interpreted by DSA. To identify a population with clinically significant stenosis, a 60% or greater reduction in diameter of the internal carotid was defined as a positive examination. Applying this criterion, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DSA as compared with standard arteriography was about 94%.
对500例连续成年患者进行了静脉注射造影剂的数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查,并对颈动脉分叉处的图像质量进行了评估。共获得了974个颈总动脉、925个颈内动脉和904个颈外动脉节段的诊断质量检查图像。62例患者在DSA检查的同时进行了标准颈动脉造影。在98个颈总动脉节段中的97个、95个颈内动脉节段中的94个以及91个颈外动脉节段中的79个中,标准动脉造影与诊断质量DSA检查结果一致。所有完全性颈动脉闭塞病例(14例中的14例)均被DSA正确诊断。为了确定具有临床意义的狭窄人群,将颈内动脉直径减少60%或更多定义为阳性检查。应用该标准,与标准动脉造影相比,DSA的敏感性、特异性和准确性约为94%。