• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于理解时间偏好的发展:来自实地实验的证据。

Toward an understanding of the development of time preferences: Evidence from field experiments.

作者信息

Andreoni James, Kuhn Michael A, List John A, Samek Anya, Sokal Kevin, Sprenger Charles

机构信息

University of California, San Diego.

NBER.

出版信息

J Public Econ. 2019 Sep;177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.06.007
PMID:32863460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7455026/
Abstract

Time preferences have been correlated with a range of life outcomes, yet little is known about their early development. We conduct a field experiment to elicit time preferences of over 1,200 children ages 3-12, who make several intertemporal decisions. To shed light on how such primitives form, we explore various channels that might affect time preferences, from background characteristics to the causal impact of an early schooling program that we developed and operated. Our results suggest that time preferences evolve substantially during this period, with younger children displaying more impatience than older children. We also find a strong association with race: black children, relative to white or Hispanic children, are more impatient. Finally, assignment to different schooling opportunities is not significantly associated with child time preferences.

摘要

时间偏好已与一系列生活结果相关联,但对其早期发展却知之甚少。我们进行了一项实地实验,以引出1200多名3至12岁儿童的时间偏好,这些儿童做出了几个跨期决策。为了阐明这些原始偏好是如何形成的,我们探索了各种可能影响时间偏好的渠道,从背景特征到我们开发并实施的一个早期教育项目的因果影响。我们的结果表明,在此期间时间偏好会大幅演变,年幼儿童比年长儿童表现出更多的不耐烦。我们还发现与种族有很强的关联:相对于白人或西班牙裔儿童,黑人儿童更不耐烦。最后,被分配到不同的教育机会与儿童的时间偏好没有显著关联。

相似文献

1
Toward an understanding of the development of time preferences: Evidence from field experiments.关于理解时间偏好的发展:来自实地实验的证据。
J Public Econ. 2019 Sep;177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
2
Adolescent Time and Risk Preferences: Measurement, Determinants and Field Consequences.青少年的时间与风险偏好:测量、决定因素及实际影响
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Apr;184:460-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
4
Risk Preferences of Children and Adolescents in Relation to Gender, Cognitive Skills, Soft Skills, and Executive Functions.儿童和青少年的风险偏好与性别、认知技能、软技能和执行功能的关系
J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Nov;179:729-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
5
The intergenerational transmission of obesity: The role of time preferences and self-control.肥胖的代际传递:时间偏好和自我控制的作用。
Econ Hum Biol. 2018 Feb;28:92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The Effect of Early Childhood Education on Social Preferences.幼儿教育对社会偏好的影响。
J Polit Econ. 2020 Jul;128(7):2739-2758. doi: 10.1086/706858. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Doctor-patient differences in risk and time preferences: A field experiment.医患在风险和时间偏好上的差异:一项实地实验。
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making.医生的种族、年龄和性别对医生关于预立医疗指示的态度以及临终决策偏好的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 May;47(5):579-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02573.x.
10
Child and Adolescent Health and Development: Realizing Neglected Potential儿童与青少年健康及发展:释放被忽视的潜力

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity in place effects on health: The case of time preferences and adolescent obesity.地点效应对健康的影响存在异质性:时间偏好与青少年肥胖的案例。
Econ Hum Biol. 2023 Apr;49:101218. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101218. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Risk Preferences of Children and Adolescents in Relation to Gender, Cognitive Skills, Soft Skills, and Executive Functions.儿童和青少年的风险偏好与性别、认知技能、软技能和执行功能的关系
J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Nov;179:729-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
Targeted self-regulation interventions in low-income children: Clinical trial results and implications for health behavior change.针对低收入儿童的目标自我调节干预:临床试验结果及其对健康行为改变的意义。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Aug;208:105157. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105157. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
4
Ambient Assisted Living: Identifying New Challenges and Needs for Digital Technologies and Service Innovation.环境辅助生活:识别数字技术和服务创新的新挑战和需求。
Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):141-149. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726492. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Adolescent Time and Risk Preferences: Measurement, Determinants and Field Consequences.青少年的时间与风险偏好:测量、决定因素及实际影响
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Apr;184:460-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
6
Developmentally informed behaviour change techniques to enhance self-regulation in a health promotion context: a conceptual review.发展导向的行为改变技术,以增强健康促进背景下的自我调节:概念综述。
Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;14(1):116-131. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1718530. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Early Childhood Education on Social Preferences.幼儿教育对社会偏好的影响。
J Polit Econ. 2020 Jul;128(7):2739-2758. doi: 10.1086/706858. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
Risk Preferences of Children and Adolescents in Relation to Gender, Cognitive Skills, Soft Skills, and Executive Functions.儿童和青少年的风险偏好与性别、认知技能、软技能和执行功能的关系
J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Nov;179:729-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
The test-retest reliability of the latent construct of executive function depends on whether tasks are represented as formative or reflective indicators.执行功能潜在结构的重测信度取决于任务是被表征为构成性指标还是反映性指标。
Child Neuropsychol. 2017 Oct;23(7):822-837. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2016.1205009. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
4
Intergenerational transfer of time and risk preferences.时间偏好和风险偏好的代际传递。
J Econ Psychol. 2015 Aug;49:187-204. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.06.003.
5
The curious relation between theory of mind and sharing in preschool age children.学前儿童心理理论与分享行为之间的奇特关系。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117947. eCollection 2015.
6
Why superman can wait: cognitive self-transformation in the delay of gratification paradigm.为什么超人可以等待:在延迟满足范式中的认知自我转变。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(2):307-17. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.546040.
7
Individual discount rates and smoking: evidence from a field experiment in Denmark.个人贴现率与吸烟:来自丹麦实地实验的证据。
J Health Econ. 2010 Sep;29(5):708-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
8
Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior.个体实验室测量的贴现率可预测实际行为。
J Risk Uncertain. 2008 Dec 1;37(2-3):237-269. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9053-x.
9
Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women.肥胖女性比体重正常的女性表现出更大的延迟折扣。
Appetite. 2008 Nov;51(3):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
10
The development of prudence in the face of varying future rewards.面对不同未来回报时审慎态度的发展。
Dev Sci. 2007 Jul;10(4):502-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00603.x.