Ugalde-Araya Daniela, Coto-Vílchez Carolina, Ávila-Aguirre Alejandro, Chavarría-Soley Gabriela, Raventós Henriette, Contreras Javier
Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular, University of Costa Rica.
Escuela de Biología, University of Costa Rica.
Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020 Feb;35:38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.npbr.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
Imprecision of the psychiatric phenotype might partially explain the failure of genetic research to identify genes that contribute to susceptibility of anxiety disorders. Previous research concluded two underlying constructs, worry and rumination, might explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican patients with history of mania. The goal of the current study is to explore the presence of latent constructs for quantitative anxiety in a group of subjects with a wide diagnostic phenotype and non-affected individuals.
We conducted an exploratory factor analysis of anxiety trait in 709 subjects. Our sample was comprised by 419 subjects with psychiatric disorders and 290 non-affected individuals. We used principal factors extraction method with squared multiple correlations of the STAI (trait subscale).
We found the following preliminary results: a three-factor solution with a good simple structure and statistical adequacy was obtained with a KMO of 0.92 (>0.6) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity of 5644,44 (p<0.05). The STAI items were grouped into three factors: anxiety-absent, worry and rumination based on the characteristics of the symptoms.
Two underlying constructs, worry and rumination may explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican subjects. Our proposed underlying structure of subsyndromal anxiety in individuals should be considered as an important factor in defining better phenotypic characterizations on a broader diagnostic concept. Worry and rumination as a phenotypic characterization may assist in genotyping; however, its predictive value on actual illness outcome still requires more research. The Genome-Wide QTL analysis for anxiety trait in the same sample is ongoing.
精神疾病表型的不精确性可能部分解释了基因研究未能识别出导致焦虑症易感性的基因的原因。先前的研究得出结论,两种潜在结构,即担忧和沉思,可能解释了有躁狂病史的哥斯达黎加患者的焦虑亚综合征症状。本研究的目的是在一组具有广泛诊断表型的受试者和未受影响的个体中探索定量焦虑的潜在结构的存在。
我们对709名受试者的焦虑特质进行了探索性因素分析。我们的样本包括419名患有精神疾病的受试者和290名未受影响的个体。我们使用主因素提取方法和状态特质焦虑问卷(特质子量表)的复相关平方。
我们得到了以下初步结果:通过主因素提取方法得到了一个具有良好简单结构和统计适当性的三因素解决方案,KMO值为0.92(>0.6),巴特利特球形度检验值为5644.44(p<0.05)。根据症状特征,状态特质焦虑问卷项目被分为三个因素:无焦虑、担忧和沉思。
担忧和沉思这两种潜在结构可能解释哥斯达黎加受试者的焦虑亚综合征症状。我们提出的个体亚综合征焦虑的潜在结构应被视为在更广泛的诊断概念中定义更好的表型特征的一个重要因素。担忧和沉思作为一种表型特征可能有助于基因分型;然而,其对实际疾病结果的预测价值仍需要更多研究。对同一样本中焦虑特质的全基因组数量性状位点分析正在进行中。