Eckhardt Jappe, Poletti Arlo
(University of York).
(University of Trento).
Glob Policy. 2018 Oct;9(Suppl 2):5-11. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12613. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
The article introduces and summarizes the key questions and findings of this special issue of on the role of domestic and international institutions in the study of Global Value Chains (GVCs). The article starts by briefly introducing the concept of GVCs and the state-of-the-art of the existing literature focusing on the political implications of these landmark changes in the global economy. Then we make a case for grounding this emerging literature more strongly into an "institutionalist" perspective. More specifically, we argue that while a great deal of attention has been paid to intra-chain governance modes - i.e. the different ways in which firms organize their cross-border production arrangements - the role external institutional forces play in structuring chain dynamics remains surprisingly under-researched. These observations invite an analytical perspective that brings institutions back into the study of GVCs. The contributions to the special issue focus on multiple causal pathways linking GVCs and various types of domestic- and international institutions. Altogether, these contributions underscore that the politics engendered by GVCs, as well as how they evolve, can only be fully understood by paying attention to the external institutional context in which they are embedded.
本文介绍并总结了本期关于国内和国际机构在全球价值链(GVCs)研究中的作用的特刊的关键问题和研究结果。文章开篇简要介绍了全球价值链的概念以及现有文献的最新情况,这些文献聚焦于全球经济中这些具有里程碑意义的变化的政治影响。然后,我们主张将这一新兴文献更有力地置于“制度主义”视角之下。更具体地说,我们认为,虽然人们已经对链内治理模式给予了大量关注,即企业组织其跨境生产安排的不同方式,但外部制度力量在构建链动态中所起的作用仍然惊人地未得到充分研究。这些观察结果引出了一种分析视角,即将制度重新纳入全球价值链的研究。特刊的投稿聚焦于连接全球价值链与各类国内和国际机构的多种因果路径。总体而言,这些投稿强调,只有关注全球价值链所嵌入的外部制度背景,才能充分理解全球价值链所引发的政治以及它们如何演变。