Suppr超能文献

欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会临床胚胎学家认证:头十年

ESHRE Clinical Embryologist certification: the first 10 years.

作者信息

Kovačič Borut, Prados Fernando J, Plas Catherine, Woodward Bryan J, Verheyen Greta, Ramos Liliana, Mäkinen Sirpa, Apter Susanna Jamina, Vidal Francesca, Ziebe Søren, Magli M Cristina, Lundin Kersti, Sunde Arne, Plancha Carlos E

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Independent researcher, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Jul 2;2020(3):hoaa026. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa026. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

What has the ESHRE programme 'ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists' achieved after 10 years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The post-exam analysis showed a pass rate of 60% for Clinical and 50% for Senior Clinical Embryologists and a high level of internal consistency of all exams, leading to a total of 773 certified Clinical and 493 Senior Clinical Embryologists over the decade.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In an ESHRE survey on the educational and professional status of Clinical Embryology in Europe, it was found that education of laboratory personnel working in the field of assisted reproduction is highly variable between countries. In 2008, ESHRE introduced a programme, curriculum and certification in the field of Clinical Embryology. Knowledge gained by postgraduate study of recommended literature, following a clear curriculum, is verified by a written two-level exam for obtaining a certificate for Clinical (basic) or Senior Clinical (advanced) Embryologists. With a total of 1266 certificates awarded over a period of 10 years and recognition by the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes and their Council for European Specialists Medical Assessment, the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams have become an internationally recognized educational standard in the field of Clinical Embryology.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A retrospective analysis of all applications for ESHRE Clinical (2009-2018) and Senior Clinical Embryologist Certification (2008-2018) and exam results of the first decade was carried out by the Steering Committee for Clinical Embryologist Certification.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: A total of 2894 applications for ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists and the results of 10 exams for the Clinical (1478 candidates) and 11 exams for Senior Clinical (987 candidates) levels were analysed. A detailed post-exam retrospective analysis was performed regarding difficulty, discrimination and reliability levels of 1600 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) with a single best answer among four options, from eight different curriculum topics (Basic cell biology, Genetics, Developmental biology, Female reproduction, Male reproduction, IVF laboratory, Cryopreservation and Laboratory management), representing the core theoretical knowledge of Clinical Embryology. Difficulty levels of the MCQs were subsequently compared regarding each topic and each yearly exam. The participation and success rates in the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams were also assessed in terms of the educational and geographic backgrounds of candidates.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Over the 10 years studied, the mean pass rate for the Clinical Embryologist exam was 60% (range 41-86%), and for the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam was 50% (range 34-81%). On average, 63% European candidates and 35% non-European candidates passed the Clinical Embryologist exam, while 52% European candidates and 31% non-European candidates passed the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The candidates' educational level impacted on the success of the Clinical Embryologist exam but not of the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The mean difficulty indices by study topic showed that in the period of 10 years, there were no statistically significant differences between topics, for either the Clinical or Senior Clinical Embryologist exams. However, the overall exam difficulty varied between years. Reassuringly, the exam MCQ discrimination and reliability indices always showed a high level of internal consistency in all exams.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Some data from the initial ESHRE certification programme were not obtained electronically, in particular data for education, implying tables and figures reflect the specified valid data periods. Several countries exhibit different study profiles for those working in ART laboratories, such that laboratory technicians/technologists predominate in some countries, while in others only biologists and medical doctors are allowed to work with human embryos. Such differences could consequently affect the exam performance of candidates from specific countries.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The ESHRE exams on Clinical Embryology are the most widely, internationally accepted tests of knowledge in the rapidly growing area of human reproduction. Clinical Embryology is increasingly recognized as a specific discipline for scientific staff who are collaborating closely with clinicians in managing human infertility through medically assisted reproduction. The analysis of the first 10 years of application of a two-level exam for Clinical Embryology shows a consistent high quality and reliability of the exam and MCQs used. These results represent an important follow-up of the quality of the ESHRE Certification programme for Clinical Embryologists, and convincingly position Clinical Embryology in the wider group of health disciplines that are harmonized through professional bodies such as ESHRE and European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The exams provide a clear step towards the increasing professional recognition and establishment of Clinical Embryology within health systems at both European and international level.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No competing interest. All costs of the Steering Committee meetings were covered by ESHRE.

摘要

研究问题

欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)的“临床胚胎学家ESHRE认证”项目在10年后取得了哪些成果?

总结答案

考试后分析显示,临床胚胎学家的通过率为60%,高级临床胚胎学家的通过率为50%,且所有考试的内部一致性水平较高,这使得在这十年间共有773名临床胚胎学家和493名高级临床胚胎学家获得认证。

已知信息

在ESHRE关于欧洲临床胚胎学教育和专业地位的一项调查中,发现各国从事辅助生殖领域工作的实验室人员的教育情况差异很大。2008年,ESHRE在临床胚胎学领域推出了一项项目、课程和认证。通过按照明确的课程学习推荐文献所获得的知识,会通过一场两级笔试来进行验证,以获得临床(基础)或高级临床(进阶)胚胎学家证书。在10年的时间里共颁发了1266份证书,并得到了欧洲医学专家联盟及其欧洲专家医学评估委员会的认可,ESHRE临床胚胎学考试已成为临床胚胎学领域国际认可的教育标准。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:临床胚胎学家认证指导委员会对ESHRE临床胚胎学家(2009 - 2018年)和高级临床胚胎学家认证(2008 - 2018年)的所有申请以及第一个十年的考试结果进行了回顾性分析。

参与者/材料、环境、方法:对ESHRE临床胚胎学家认证的2894份申请以及临床(1478名考生)10次考试和高级临床(987名考生)11次考试的结果进行了分析。对来自八个不同课程主题(基础细胞生物学、遗传学、发育生物学、女性生殖、男性生殖、体外受精实验室、冷冻保存和实验室管理)的1600道单项选择题(MCQ)进行了详细的考试后回顾性分析,这些题目代表了临床胚胎学的核心理论知识,每个题目有四个选项,要求选出最佳答案。随后比较了每个主题和每年考试中MCQ的难度水平。还根据考生的教育背景和地理背景评估了ESHRE临床胚胎学考试的参与率和成功率。

主要结果及机遇的作用

在研究的10年中,临床胚胎学家考试的平均通过率为60%(范围41 - 86%),高级临床胚胎学家考试的平均通过率为50%(范围34 - 81%)。平均而言,63%的欧洲考生和35%的非欧洲考生通过了临床胚胎学家考试,而52%的欧洲考生和31%的非欧洲考生通过了高级临床胚胎学家考试。考生的教育水平对临床胚胎学家考试的成功率有影响,但对高级临床胚胎学家考试没有影响。按研究主题划分的平均难度指数显示,在10年期间,临床或高级临床胚胎学家考试的不同主题之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,整体考试难度在不同年份有所变化。令人欣慰的是,考试MCQ的区分度和可靠性指数在所有考试中始终显示出较高的内部一致性。

局限性、谨慎的原因:ESHRE最初认证项目的一些数据并非以电子方式获取,特别是教育数据,这意味着表格和图表反映的是指定的有效数据期。几个国家在辅助生殖技术(ART)实验室工作人员的研究概况方面存在差异,例如在一些国家实验室技术员/技师占主导,而在其他一些国家只有生物学家和医生被允许处理人类胚胎。因此,这些差异可能会影响来自特定国家考生的考试成绩。

研究结果的更广泛影响

ESHRE临床胚胎学考试是人类生殖这一快速发展领域中最广泛、国际认可的知识测试。临床胚胎学越来越被视为一门特定学科,其科研人员通过医学辅助生殖与临床医生密切合作来处理人类不孕症。对临床胚胎学两级考试前10年应用情况的分析表明,所使用的考试和MCQ具有持续的高质量和可靠性。这些结果是对ESHRE临床胚胎学家认证项目质量的重要跟进,并令人信服地将临床胚胎学置于通过ESHRE以及欧洲妇产科委员会等专业机构实现协调统一的更广泛健康学科群体中。这些考试为临床胚胎学在欧洲和国际卫生系统中获得越来越多的专业认可并得以确立迈出了明确的一步。

研究资金/利益冲突:无利益冲突。指导委员会会议的所有费用均由ESHRE承担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3512/7448581/6d9d918dd48d/hoaa026f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验