Suppr超能文献

美国栗、中国栗和杂交栗( spp.)抗枯萎病的替代小茎测定评估。

Evaluation of an Alternative Small Stem Assay for Blight Resistance in American, Chinese, and Hybrid Chestnuts ( spp.).

机构信息

Berry College, Department of Biology, Mount Berry, GA 30149.

Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Forsyth, GA 31029.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2021 Mar;105(3):576-584. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1272-RE. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

We tested an alternative small stem assay (SSA) for blight resistance in chestnuts ( spp.). Whereas standard SSAs are done by inoculating small incisions in stems, we cut off stems (4 to 5 mm diameter), inoculated the cut ends with discs of inoculum, and covered them with plastic sleeves. This method was designed to be simple to implement, to consistently induce cankering, and to better enable seedlings to recover by developing shoots from the lower stem (standard SSAs delay removal of blighted stems until late in the growing season, if at all). We conducted six experiments with seedlings and orchard trees of (susceptible), (resistant), and hybrids expected to vary in resistance. Experiments with seedlings and two of the three orchard experiments showed clear differentiation between susceptible and resistant types, especially >90 days postinoculation and when the orange-colored zone of the canker was measured. One orchard experiment failed to give clear results but was ended earlier (60 days) than the other experiments. We observed only two failed inoculations out of >200 performed. Comparisons with other studies suggest that this SSA method performs at least as well as the standard SSA method in distinguishing resistant and susceptible types, at least in seedlings. Survivorship after 1 year for seedlings inoculated in 2018 ranged from 70% for to 100% for , and in 2019 they ranged from 40% in hybrids to 100% for Deaths of seedlings after SSAs were mostly unrelated to the inoculations (e.g., root rot).

摘要

我们测试了一种替代的板栗疫病抗性小茎检测法(SSA)。标准的 SSA 是通过在茎上接种小切口来进行的,而我们则切断茎(直径 4-5 毫米),用接种物的圆盘接种切断的末端,并将其用塑料套管覆盖。这种方法旨在易于实施,能够一致地诱导溃疡,并通过从下部茎干上发育出新芽更好地使幼苗恢复(标准 SSA 如果有的话,也会延迟到生长季节后期才去除受疫病影响的茎干)。我们进行了六个实验,涉及(易感)、(抗性)和预计在抗性上有所不同的杂种的幼苗和果园树木。幼苗和其中三个果园实验中的两个实验的结果表明,易感和抗性类型之间存在明显差异,尤其是在接种后 90 天以上和测量溃疡的橙色区域时。一个果园实验没有给出明确的结果,但比其他实验更早结束(60 天)。我们观察到在进行的 200 多次接种中,只有两次接种失败。与其他研究的比较表明,这种 SSA 方法在区分抗性和易感类型方面至少与标准 SSA 方法一样有效,至少在幼苗中是如此。2018 年接种的幼苗在接种后 1 年的存活率从易感的 70%到抗性的 100%不等,而在 2019 年,从杂种的 40%到抗性的 100%不等。SSA 后幼苗的死亡大多与接种无关(例如,根腐病)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验