• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双极假体治疗急性桡骨头置换:中期结果。

Acute radial head replacement with bipolar prostheses: midterm results.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Clinic, Parma University Hospital, via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Feb;31(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02774-4. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-020-02774-4
PMID:32865665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7875843/
Abstract

In irreparable radial head fractures, especially if primary stabilizers of the elbow are damaged, the prosthetic replacement prevents instability and stiffness. Concerns have arisen over the use of bipolar press-fit prostheses due to the frequent finding of osteolysis and the risk of instability if compared to monopolar implants. Our aim was to assess midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of bipolar implants and the influence of osteolysis on proximal pain. Seventeen patients with irreparable fractures of the radial head, treated in acute with the same prosthetic model (rHEAD recon SBI/Stryker) between January 2015 and December 2018, were enrolled. Clinical assessment was performed using MEPS and DASH scores; a radiographic study was done to identify heterotopic ossifications and periprosthetic osteolysis. Outcomes at the last follow-up, according to MEPS, were excellent in 10 cases, good in 5 and fair in 2; none of the patients had severe pain or instability. In 3 cases, it was necessary to remove the implant, mainly because of early loosening. Radiological findings of osteolysis were detected in 9 cases, but no statistical correlation was found with MEPS and proximal pain. The use of bipolar implants is reliable if an accurate repair of ligament tears is performed and provides a good stability. Nevertheless, the risk of early aseptic loosening in uncemented implants is not negligible, and the follow-up of the patient must be strict. Late osteolysis does not seem to have clinical relevance, but further prospective studies are necessary to clarify this topic.

摘要

在不可修复的桡骨头骨折中,特别是如果肘部的主要稳定器受损,假体置换可防止不稳定和僵硬。由于经常发现骨溶解以及与单极植入物相比存在不稳定的风险,因此人们对双极压配合假体的使用产生了担忧。我们的目的是评估双极植入物的中期临床和影像学结果,以及骨溶解对近侧疼痛的影响。17 名桡骨头不可修复骨折患者,于 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月急性采用相同的假体模型(rHEAD recon SBI/Stryker)治疗,纳入本研究。使用 MEPS 和 DASH 评分进行临床评估;进行影像学研究以识别异位骨化和假体周围骨溶解。末次随访时,根据 MEPS 评估结果,10 例为优,5 例为良,2 例为可;无患者有严重疼痛或不稳定。3 例需要取出植入物,主要是因为早期松动。9 例发现有骨溶解的影像学表现,但与 MEPS 和近侧疼痛无统计学相关性。如果准确修复韧带撕裂,使用双极植入物是可靠的,可提供良好的稳定性。然而,非骨水泥植入物的早期无菌性松动风险不容忽视,必须对患者进行严格随访。晚期骨溶解似乎没有临床意义,但需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明这一问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/5b614300fe1e/590_2020_2774_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/4a9ed3cc7890/590_2020_2774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/aeda1e30f451/590_2020_2774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/5b614300fe1e/590_2020_2774_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/4a9ed3cc7890/590_2020_2774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/aeda1e30f451/590_2020_2774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d708/7875843/5b614300fe1e/590_2020_2774_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Acute radial head replacement with bipolar prostheses: midterm results.双极假体治疗急性桡骨头置换:中期结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Feb;31(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02774-4. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Unipolar and Bipolar Radial Head Prosthesis in Patients with Radial Head Fracture: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.单极与双极桡骨头假体治疗桡骨头骨折患者的临床及影像学结果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):178-184. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1299262. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
3
Clinical and radiographic comparisons of two different radial head implant designs.两种不同桡骨小头植入物设计的临床和影像学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 May 7.
4
Short to midterm outcomes of one hundred and seventy one MoPyC radial head prostheses: meta-analysis.171例MoPyC桡骨头假体的短期至中期结果:荟萃分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2403-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4070-0. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Radial head replacement with unipolar and bipolar SBi system: a clinical and radiographic analysis after a 2-year mean follow-up.采用单极和双极SBi系统进行桡骨头置换:平均2年随访后的临床和影像学分析
Musculoskelet Surg. 2012 May;96 Suppl 1:S69-79. doi: 10.1007/s12306-012-0198-z. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
6
Mid-term outcomes of 77 modular radial head prostheses.77个模块化桡骨头假体的中期结果
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1197-1203. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1043.R2.
7
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: resection or prosthesis?桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术还是假体植入?
Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S29-S34. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30603-9.
8
Metallic Press-fit Radial Head Replacement for Radial Head Fractures.用于桡骨头骨折的金属压配式桡骨头置换术
Orthopedics. 2019 Nov 1;42(6):e545-e551. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190604-07. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
9
Tight-fitting radial head prosthesis: does stem size help prevent painful loosening?紧配合型桡骨头假体:柄部尺寸有助于预防疼痛性松动吗?
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3644-6. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Radial head replacement for acute complex elbow instability: a long-term comparative cohort study of 2 implant designs.急性复杂肘关节不稳的桡骨头置换:两种植入物设计的长期比较队列研究
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Dec;32(12):2581-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.023. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Good outcomes of bipolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures : a cohort study of 64 patients with an average 5.2-year follow-up.双极桡骨头置换术治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的良好疗效:一项对64例患者平均随访5.2年的队列研究
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jun 18;6(6):724-733. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0202.R2.
2
A proposal for computed tomography-based algorithm for the management of radial head and neck fractures: the Proximal and Articular Radial fractures Management (PARMa) classification.基于计算机断层扫描的桡骨头和颈部骨折管理算法提案:近端和关节桡骨骨折管理(PARMa)分类
JSES Int. 2024 Nov 8;9(2):549-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.031. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of bipolar and monopolar radial head prostheses in elbow fracture-dislocation.桡骨头双极和单极假体治疗肘关节骨折脱位的比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Apr;106(2):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.027. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Why does radial head arthroplasty fail today? A systematic review of recent literature.为何如今桡骨头置换术会失败?近期文献的系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Jan 28;4(12):659-667. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180099. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Primary cemented bipolar radial head prostheses for acute elbow injuries with comminuted radial head fractures: mid-term results of 37 patients.
Comminuted Mason III/IV Radial Head Fractures: What Is the Best Treatment Between Prosthesis and Radial Head Resection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
粉碎性梅森III/IV型桡骨头骨折:假体植入与桡骨头切除术哪种治疗方法最佳?一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 6;14(5):1773. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051773.
4
[Radial head arthropolasty in unreconstructable comminuted fractures of the radial head: Long-term results and factors influencing the outcome].[桡骨头不可重建粉碎性骨折的桡骨头置换术:长期结果及影响预后的因素]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;126(3):218-226. doi: 10.1007/s00113-021-01139-8. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Radial head fractures.桡骨头骨折。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jul 8;20:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101497. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
RADIAL head arthroplasty: does ligaments repair influence outcomes? A minimum two years follow-up radiographic multi-center study.桡骨头置换术:韧带修复对疗效有影响吗?一项至少两年随访的影像学多中心研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Apr;32(3):405-411. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02979-1. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
用于急性肘关节损伤伴桡骨头粉碎性骨折的初次骨水泥固定双极桡骨头假体:37例患者的中期结果
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Apr;103(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0576-2. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
4
Radial head arthroplasty for radial head fractures: a clinical and radiological comparison of monopolar and bipolar radial head arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 6 years.桡骨头置换治疗桡骨头骨折:平均随访 6 年后单极和双极桡骨头置换的临床和放射学比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun;46(3):565-572. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1042-4. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
Radial head replacement with a bipolar system: an average 10-year follow-up.双极系统行桡骨头置换术:平均 10 年随访结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):e38-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
6
The Rate of Radial Head Prosthesis Removal or Revision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.桡骨头假体取出或翻修率:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):39-53.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.031. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
Press-fit bipolar radial head arthroplasty, midterm results.压配式双极桡骨头置换术:中期结果
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Aug;25(8):1235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Modified Mason type III and IV radial head fractures: results of different surgical treatments.改良 Mason III 型和 IV 型桡骨头骨折:不同手术治疗的结果
Acta Biomed. 2015 Dec 14;86(3):242-50.
9
Outcomes of bipolar radial head prosthesis to treat complex radial head fractures in 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 50 months.采用双极桡骨头假体治疗22例复杂桡骨头骨折患者的疗效,平均随访50个月。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Nov;100(7):703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
10
Radial head reconstruction in elbow fracture-dislocation: monopolar or bipolar prosthesis?桡骨头重建在肘骨折脱位中的应用:单极假体还是双极假体?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2144-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3672-0.