Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Clinic, Parma University Hospital, via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Feb;31(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02774-4. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
In irreparable radial head fractures, especially if primary stabilizers of the elbow are damaged, the prosthetic replacement prevents instability and stiffness. Concerns have arisen over the use of bipolar press-fit prostheses due to the frequent finding of osteolysis and the risk of instability if compared to monopolar implants. Our aim was to assess midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of bipolar implants and the influence of osteolysis on proximal pain. Seventeen patients with irreparable fractures of the radial head, treated in acute with the same prosthetic model (rHEAD recon SBI/Stryker) between January 2015 and December 2018, were enrolled. Clinical assessment was performed using MEPS and DASH scores; a radiographic study was done to identify heterotopic ossifications and periprosthetic osteolysis. Outcomes at the last follow-up, according to MEPS, were excellent in 10 cases, good in 5 and fair in 2; none of the patients had severe pain or instability. In 3 cases, it was necessary to remove the implant, mainly because of early loosening. Radiological findings of osteolysis were detected in 9 cases, but no statistical correlation was found with MEPS and proximal pain. The use of bipolar implants is reliable if an accurate repair of ligament tears is performed and provides a good stability. Nevertheless, the risk of early aseptic loosening in uncemented implants is not negligible, and the follow-up of the patient must be strict. Late osteolysis does not seem to have clinical relevance, but further prospective studies are necessary to clarify this topic.
在不可修复的桡骨头骨折中,特别是如果肘部的主要稳定器受损,假体置换可防止不稳定和僵硬。由于经常发现骨溶解以及与单极植入物相比存在不稳定的风险,因此人们对双极压配合假体的使用产生了担忧。我们的目的是评估双极植入物的中期临床和影像学结果,以及骨溶解对近侧疼痛的影响。17 名桡骨头不可修复骨折患者,于 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月急性采用相同的假体模型(rHEAD recon SBI/Stryker)治疗,纳入本研究。使用 MEPS 和 DASH 评分进行临床评估;进行影像学研究以识别异位骨化和假体周围骨溶解。末次随访时,根据 MEPS 评估结果,10 例为优,5 例为良,2 例为可;无患者有严重疼痛或不稳定。3 例需要取出植入物,主要是因为早期松动。9 例发现有骨溶解的影像学表现,但与 MEPS 和近侧疼痛无统计学相关性。如果准确修复韧带撕裂,使用双极植入物是可靠的,可提供良好的稳定性。然而,非骨水泥植入物的早期无菌性松动风险不容忽视,必须对患者进行严格随访。晚期骨溶解似乎没有临床意义,但需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明这一问题。