Drake R E, Laine G A
Center for Microvascular and Lymphatic Studies, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Feb;64(2):487-501. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.2.487.
Research in pulmonary microvascular permeability has been a hot bed of activity for the last 20 years, primarily because increases in permeability contribute to the development of some forms of pulmonary edema in humans. New techniques and animal preparations have lead to significant advances, and most of these advances have been well described in several recent reviews. Unfortunately, there is still confusion over what the techniques measure and when they can be used to make reliable permeability estimates. Furthermore, we have a different point of view than previous authors. For instance: 1) we question the assumption that lymph flow rate is proportional to filtration rate, whereas other authors have implicitly assumed this relationship to be true; 2) we believe that the wide range of filtration coefficients measured with various techniques may be narrowed by consideration of the types of errors likely to result with each technique; 3) we place more emphasis than previous authors on the potential problems caused by the collection of impure lung lymph and the possibility that lymph composition may be altered within lymph nodes. For these reasons we believe that readers may benefit from a review of the techniques used in pulmonary permeability studies written from our perspective.
在过去20年里,肺微血管通透性研究一直是一个活跃的领域,主要是因为通透性增加会导致人类某些形式肺水肿的发生。新技术和动物实验方法取得了显著进展,最近的几篇综述中对其中大部分进展都有详尽描述。遗憾的是,对于这些技术所测量的内容以及何时能够用于进行可靠的通透性评估,仍然存在困惑。此外,我们与之前的作者观点不同。例如:1)我们质疑淋巴流速与滤过率成正比这一假设,而其他作者隐含地认为这种关系是成立的;2)我们认为,通过考虑每种技术可能导致的误差类型,可以缩小用各种技术测得的滤过系数的宽泛范围;3)与之前的作者相比,我们更强调收集不纯肺淋巴所引起的潜在问题以及淋巴成分可能在淋巴结内发生改变的可能性。出于这些原因,我们认为读者可能会从从我们的角度对肺通透性研究中所使用技术的综述中受益。