Zenderland L
California State University, Fullerton 92634.
J Hist Behav Sci. 1988 Apr;24(2):152-65. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(198804)24:2<152::aid-jhbs2300240203>3.0.co;2-6.
Both contemporary psychologists and historians of the discipline have disparaged the poor quality of research generated by the Child-Study movement. The real significance of this movement, however, lay not in its scientific findings but in its institutional innovations. Its most important legacy was the structuring of a new working relationship between psychologists and schoolteachers. This mutually beneficial collaboration subtly altered the shape of professional psychology by reorienting research toward practical classroom concerns. In the midst of controversies surrounding the social role and scientific potential of Child-Study, a new clinical psychology began to emerge.
当代心理学家和该学科的历史学家都贬低了儿童研究运动所产生的研究质量之差。然而,这场运动的真正意义并不在于其科学发现,而在于其制度创新。它最重要的遗产是构建了心理学家和教师之间一种新的工作关系。这种互利的合作通过将研究重新导向实际课堂问题,微妙地改变了专业心理学的形态。在围绕儿童研究的社会角色和科学潜力的争议之中,一种新的临床心理学开始出现。