Department of Internal Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, GA, Atlanta, USA.
Ann Hematol. 2021 Jan;100(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04238-5. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing consolidation chemotherapy with intermediate or high-dose cytarabine (IDAC/HiDAC) are often placed on prophylactic antibacterials. This practice is largely based on the benefits of prophylaxis (PPX) during induction chemotherapy. However, recent concerns regarding antibacterial prophylaxis have emerged including risk of Clostridioides difficile colitis, medication toxicities, and the potential for fostering multidrug-resistant pathogens. We therefore retrospectively explored whether antibacterial PPX is beneficial during cytarabine consolidation. Adult AML patients who received IDAC/HiDAC at our institution from January 2007 to March 2018 were evaluated for receipt of antibacterial PPX. The primary endpoint was rate of febrile neutropenia (FN); secondary endpoints were rates of unplanned hospitalization, bacteremia, infection from resistant organisms, C. difficile colitis, and death from infection. One hundred twenty patients with data from 229 IDAC/HiDAC cycles were included. Patients who received antibacterial PPX were more often hospitalized during cytarabine cycle 1 (C1) than those who received no PPX. Patients who received PPX had significantly more episodes of bacteremia, in addition to infections from resistant, predominantly Gram-positive organisms during cycle 1 of consolidation than those without PPX. Antibacterial PPX during IDAC/HiDAC consolidation treatment at our institution did not decrease the rates of FN, hospitalization, or bacteremia and was associated with higher risk of infection from drug-resistant bacteria in C1. Prospective studies examining antibacterial prophylaxis during cytarabine consolidation for AML patients are necessary, with strong consideration made for institution-specific protocols.
接受中剂量或高剂量阿糖胞苷(IDAC/HiDAC)巩固化疗的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者通常会预防性使用抗菌药物。这种做法主要基于诱导化疗时预防的益处(PPX)。然而,最近对抗菌预防的关注已经出现,包括艰难梭菌结肠炎、药物毒性和促进多药耐药病原体的风险。因此,我们回顾性探讨了阿糖胞苷巩固期间抗菌预防是否有益。
评估了 2007 年 1 月至 2018 年 3 月在我院接受 IDAC/HiDAC 的成人 AML 患者是否接受抗菌预防。主要终点是发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发生率;次要终点是计划外住院、菌血症、耐药菌感染、艰难梭菌结肠炎和感染性死亡的发生率。
纳入了 120 名患者,共 229 个 IDAC/HiDAC 周期的数据。接受抗菌预防的患者在阿糖胞苷周期 1(C1)期间住院的频率高于未接受预防的患者。接受预防的患者在巩固治疗的 C1 中,除了感染耐药菌外,还发生了更多的菌血症,而未接受预防的患者则没有。
在我们的机构中,IDAC/HiDAC 巩固治疗期间使用抗菌预防并没有降低 FN、住院或菌血症的发生率,并且与 C1 中耐药菌感染的风险增加相关。对于 AML 患者的阿糖胞苷巩固期间抗菌预防,需要进行前瞻性研究,并充分考虑机构特定的方案。