Suppr超能文献

忧郁性抑郁症与喹硫平的反应:四项随机安慰剂对照试验的汇总分析。

Melancholic depression and response to quetiapine: A pooled analysis of four randomized placebo-controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Room 119 Ellis Hall, Royal University Hospital, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon S7N0W8, SK, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Room 119 Ellis Hall, Royal University Hospital, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon S7N0W8, SK, Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:696-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.071. Epub 2020 Jul 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Melancholic depression may preferentially respond to certain treatments. This study examined the efficacy of extended-release quetiapine monotherapy in patients with melancholic and nonmelancholic major depressive disorder.

METHODS

Data from four randomized placebo-controlled trials was pooled. Melancholic features were assessed with baseline depression scale items according to DSM criteria. The outcome measure was response on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Cox regression models predicting response over time with interactions between treatment condition and melancholic status were used to test for treatment effect heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The 6-week response rate difference between quetiapine and placebo was roughly 10% greater in the melancholic subgroup, primarily due to a lower placebo response, although the subgroup-treatment interactions did not reach statistical significance. The main effect of quetiapine was significant in every model.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations were the retrospective analysis and the post-hoc designation of melancholic depression based on scale items not designed for that purpose. Results should be considered preliminary and exploratory until replicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower placebo response rate in the melancholic subgroup is consistent with past research and reinforces the benefit of pharmacotherapy for these patients.

摘要

背景

忧郁性抑郁可能对某些治疗方法更敏感。本研究考察了 1 种新型抗抑郁药喹硫平(quetiapine)在伴有和不伴忧郁特征的重性抑郁障碍患者中的疗效。

方法

对 4 项随机安慰剂对照试验的数据进行了汇总分析。根据 DSM 标准,使用抑郁量表条目评估忧郁特征。疗效评估指标为蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale)的应答。采用 Cox 回归模型,根据治疗条件和忧郁状态之间的交互作用,预测随时间应答的情况,以检验治疗效果的异质性。

结果

喹硫平与安慰剂相比,忧郁亚组的 6 周应答率差异约高 10%,这主要是由于安慰剂的应答率较低,但亚组与治疗的交互作用未达到统计学显著性。喹硫平的主要疗效在每个模型中均显著。

局限性

主要局限性是回顾性分析以及根据并非为此目的而设计的量表条目事后诊断忧郁性抑郁。结果应被视为初步和探索性的,尚需进一步验证。

结论

忧郁亚组中安慰剂的低应答率与既往研究结果一致,这进一步强化了为这些患者提供药物治疗的获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验