Suppr超能文献

步行疗法与身心疗法治疗慢性下腰痛的有效性:近期随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Effectiveness of walking versus mind-body therapies in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Nduwimana Ildephonse, Nindorera Félix, Thonnard Jean Louis, Kossi Oyene

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

National Center for Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation (CNRKR), Bujumbura, Burundi.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 28;99(35):e21969. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021969.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Walking and mind-body therapies (MBTs) are commonly recommended to relieve pain and improve function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of walking and MBTs in CLBP.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing walking or MBTs to any other intervention or control in adults with CLBP. Studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. The research was limited to studies published in English and French between January 2008 and December 2018. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed studies quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Statistical analyses were performed under a random-effects model. We analyzed pain and activity limitation, with the calculation of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for the different treatment effects.

RESULTS

Thirty one randomized controlled trials involving 3193 participants were analyzed. Walking was as effective as control interventions in the short-term and slightly superior in the intermediate term with respect to pain (Standardized mean differences (SMD)  = -0.34; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.03; P = .03) and activity limitation (SMD = -0.30; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.10; P = .003). In contrast, yoga was more effective than control interventions in the short term in terms of pain (SMD = -1.47; 95% CI, -2.26 to -0.68; P = .0003) and activity limitation (SMD = -1.17; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.55; P = .0002). Yoga was no longer superior to the control interventions for pain at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

MBTs, especially yoga, seem to be more effective in the short term, and walking seems to be more effective in the intermediate term, for the relief of pain and activity limitation in patients with CLBP. A combination of walking and MBTs fits the biopsychosocial model and might be valuable therapy for CLBP throughout follow-up due to combined effects.

摘要

目的

通常推荐步行和身心疗法(MBTs)来缓解慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的疼痛并改善其功能。本研究的目的是比较步行和MBTs对CLBP的疗效。

方法

我们纳入了将步行或MBTs与CLBP成年患者的任何其他干预措施或对照进行比较的随机对照试验(RCTs)。通过PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO、Scopus和ScienceDirect数据库检索研究。研究仅限于2008年1月至2018年12月期间以英文和法文发表的研究。两名评价者独立选择研究、提取数据,并使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估研究质量。在随机效应模型下进行统计分析。我们分析了疼痛和活动受限情况,计算了不同治疗效果的标准化平均差和95%置信区间。

结果

分析了涉及3193名参与者的31项随机对照试验。在短期,步行与对照干预措施效果相同,在中期,就疼痛而言(标准化平均差(SMD)=-0.34;95%置信区间,-0.65至-0.03;P=0.03)和活动受限而言(SMD=-0.30;95%置信区间,-0.50至-0.10;P=0.003),步行略优于对照干预措施。相比之下,在短期,瑜伽在疼痛(SMD=-1.47;95%置信区间,-2.26至-0.68;P=0.0003)和活动受限方面(SMD=-1.17;95%置信区间,-1.80至-0.55;P=0.0002)比对照干预措施更有效。在6个月随访时,瑜伽在疼痛方面不再优于对照干预措施。

结论

对于CLBP患者的疼痛缓解和活动受限,MBTs,尤其是瑜伽,在短期内似乎更有效,而步行在中期似乎更有效。步行和MBTs的联合符合生物心理社会模型,由于联合效应,在整个随访过程中可能是CLBP的有价值疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验